Texas Governor Greg Abbott's office has finally released nearly 1,400 pages of emails exchanged with tech billionaire Elon Musk's companies, but most of the records are completely blacked out. The emails were obtained by The Texas Newsroom after a long battle with lawyers representing Abbott and SpaceX, who claimed that releasing them would reveal trade secrets and confidential information.
The documents reveal little about the relationship between Abbott and Musk or the extent of Musk's influence over state government. About 200 pages are redacted, while the rest are either already public or provide minimal information. The emails include old incorporation records for SpaceX, agendas for a governor's committee on aerospace and aviation, and even an invitation to happy hour.
Abbott's office claimed that releasing the emails would be "intimate and embarrassing" and reveal private exchanges with lawyers, policymaking decisions, and confidential information about how the state entices companies to invest. However, open government experts say this is a classic example of Texas' transparency problem, which has been exacerbated by a 2015 Supreme Court decision that made it harder to obtain records documenting interactions between governments and private companies.
Tom Leatherbury, director of the First Amendment Clinic at Southern Methodist University's Dedman School of Law, said that corporations are willing to assert that information is confidential, while governmental bodies are less likely to second-guess them. This has created a situation where companies can withhold records without fear of being investigated for potential trade secrets.
The release of these emails is also significant because Musk has invested heavily in Texas and relocated many of his businesses' headquarters to the state. He has hired lobbyists who have successfully pushed for laws that benefit his companies, making him one of the richest people in the world.
Releasing the emails was a costly process, with the governor's office initially claiming it would cost $244.64 to review them. Lawyers representing Abbott and SpaceX then sought to keep the records secret, arguing they would harm SpaceX's competitive advantage. However, the Texas Attorney General ultimately sided with Abbott and Musk, releasing only about 200 pages that were not redacted.
Experts say this is a classic example of how weakened public records laws can lead to more secrecy in government. The governor's decision to release thousands of pages but black out most of them has been described as "meaningless" by Leatherbury, who notes that it may have been an attempt to show the volume of records responsive to the request.
The Texas Newsroom has asked the Office of the Attorney General to reconsider its decision and order the release of the Musk emails. If a member of the public believes a government agency is violating the law, they can try to sue, but recent court decisions have made it more difficult to enforce public records laws against high-ranking officials like governors.
The documents reveal little about the relationship between Abbott and Musk or the extent of Musk's influence over state government. About 200 pages are redacted, while the rest are either already public or provide minimal information. The emails include old incorporation records for SpaceX, agendas for a governor's committee on aerospace and aviation, and even an invitation to happy hour.
Abbott's office claimed that releasing the emails would be "intimate and embarrassing" and reveal private exchanges with lawyers, policymaking decisions, and confidential information about how the state entices companies to invest. However, open government experts say this is a classic example of Texas' transparency problem, which has been exacerbated by a 2015 Supreme Court decision that made it harder to obtain records documenting interactions between governments and private companies.
Tom Leatherbury, director of the First Amendment Clinic at Southern Methodist University's Dedman School of Law, said that corporations are willing to assert that information is confidential, while governmental bodies are less likely to second-guess them. This has created a situation where companies can withhold records without fear of being investigated for potential trade secrets.
The release of these emails is also significant because Musk has invested heavily in Texas and relocated many of his businesses' headquarters to the state. He has hired lobbyists who have successfully pushed for laws that benefit his companies, making him one of the richest people in the world.
Releasing the emails was a costly process, with the governor's office initially claiming it would cost $244.64 to review them. Lawyers representing Abbott and SpaceX then sought to keep the records secret, arguing they would harm SpaceX's competitive advantage. However, the Texas Attorney General ultimately sided with Abbott and Musk, releasing only about 200 pages that were not redacted.
Experts say this is a classic example of how weakened public records laws can lead to more secrecy in government. The governor's decision to release thousands of pages but black out most of them has been described as "meaningless" by Leatherbury, who notes that it may have been an attempt to show the volume of records responsive to the request.
The Texas Newsroom has asked the Office of the Attorney General to reconsider its decision and order the release of the Musk emails. If a member of the public believes a government agency is violating the law, they can try to sue, but recent court decisions have made it more difficult to enforce public records laws against high-ranking officials like governors.