The Socialist Party of America's mayoral nominee in 1917, Morris Hillquit, ran a groundbreaking campaign for mayor of New York City, focusing on the real conditions of working people's lives and promising to control rising rents, improve public transit, and make groceries more affordable. A century later, Zohran Mamdani is running a similarly populist campaign, fueled by growing discontent with the status quo.
Mamdani, an immigrant from Uganda, has been praised for his articulateness and commitment to social justice. While some have questioned whether he can overcome the deep-seated divisions in American politics that destroyed Hillquit's chances of election in 1917, Mamdani's campaign offers a glimmer of hope.
One reason for optimism is that the political machinery that crushed socialism in the early 20th century has broken down, and ordinary people are looking for more. In contrast to Hillquit, who was fighting against the entrenched power of Tammany Hall and William Randolph Hearst, Mamdani's campaign is taking place in a very different context.
Hillquit, an outsider from Latvia, had built strong ties with Jewish, Black, and Irish communities through his labor law practice and involvement in the Socialist Party. While he faced fierce opposition from his opponents, Hillquit also won some unexpected support – including A. Philip Randolph's backing in Harlem.
Fast-forward to today, where African Americans are still grappling with systemic inequality, and Irish Americans have largely assimilated into mainstream culture. In this context, Zohran Mamdani's commitment to anti-imperialism and social justice resonates deeply with marginalized communities.
Mamdani's campaign also offers a rare opportunity for ordinary people to make moral choices about what it means to be "American." In an era where toxic patriotism has become the norm, Hillquit's legacy – and that of his fellow socialists – serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of principle and courage in the face of overwhelming opposition.
Ultimately, whether or not Zohran Mamdani wins the mayoral election, his campaign is a testament to the enduring power of democratic ideals. As Morris Hillquit so eloquently put it over a century ago, "The sacrifice of principle for expediency – this I will never do."
Mamdani, an immigrant from Uganda, has been praised for his articulateness and commitment to social justice. While some have questioned whether he can overcome the deep-seated divisions in American politics that destroyed Hillquit's chances of election in 1917, Mamdani's campaign offers a glimmer of hope.
One reason for optimism is that the political machinery that crushed socialism in the early 20th century has broken down, and ordinary people are looking for more. In contrast to Hillquit, who was fighting against the entrenched power of Tammany Hall and William Randolph Hearst, Mamdani's campaign is taking place in a very different context.
Hillquit, an outsider from Latvia, had built strong ties with Jewish, Black, and Irish communities through his labor law practice and involvement in the Socialist Party. While he faced fierce opposition from his opponents, Hillquit also won some unexpected support – including A. Philip Randolph's backing in Harlem.
Fast-forward to today, where African Americans are still grappling with systemic inequality, and Irish Americans have largely assimilated into mainstream culture. In this context, Zohran Mamdani's commitment to anti-imperialism and social justice resonates deeply with marginalized communities.
Mamdani's campaign also offers a rare opportunity for ordinary people to make moral choices about what it means to be "American." In an era where toxic patriotism has become the norm, Hillquit's legacy – and that of his fellow socialists – serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of principle and courage in the face of overwhelming opposition.
Ultimately, whether or not Zohran Mamdani wins the mayoral election, his campaign is a testament to the enduring power of democratic ideals. As Morris Hillquit so eloquently put it over a century ago, "The sacrifice of principle for expediency – this I will never do."