12/2: The Takeout with Major Garrett

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has vowed to continue targeting alleged drug boats, saying that strikes are only "the beginning". The secretary of defense made the statement in a recent interview on CBS News' 'The Takeout', where he discussed his plans for tackling maritime threats and highlighted a new book that exposes China's state-run espionage campaign against the US. Hegseth emphasized that increased military action is needed to combat the growing threat posed by Chinese naval vessels in international waters.

The secretary of defense also made headlines last week when he announced a $400 billion defense spending package, which aims to bolster America's military capabilities in key regions such as Asia and Europe. The package includes funding for advanced missile systems, cyber warfare programs, and special operations forces.

Hegseth's comments on 'The Takeout' came amidst growing tensions between the US and China over issues such as trade, security, and territorial claims. His remarks are likely to be seen as a significant shift in the administration's approach to China, which has been marked by skepticism and criticism.

In addition to his focus on maritime security, Hegseth also emphasized the need for greater investment in cyber warfare capabilities, citing the increasing threat posed by Chinese hackers. The secretary of defense promised that the US would not be caught off guard by future attacks, but did not provide details on specific plans or timelines.

Overall, Hegseth's comments on 'The Takeout' reflect a more assertive and proactive approach to national security, one that prioritizes military strength and advanced technologies over diplomatic engagement.
 
ummm i dont get why america is making such a big deal about china ๐Ÿค” theyre just trying to gain some influence in the world like everyone else...and by the way 400 billion dollars for defense? thats just crazy ๐Ÿ’ธ its like they think china's gonna launch an attack on them or something lol what if they just wanna have a trade war and call it a day? ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
I'm kinda worried about this defense spending package... $400 billion sounds crazy expensive ๐Ÿ’ธ, like we should be focusing on social issues too ๐Ÿค. On the other hand, I think we gotta beef up our military capabilities, China's been getting a bit too big for its boots ๐Ÿš€. But at the same time, more military action might just escalate things and lead to some major conflict โš”๏ธ... or maybe not? It's hard to say, I'm torn ๐Ÿ˜’. We need to be smart about this, but Hegseth's comments do seem like a clear signal that the US is ready to take on China head-on ๐Ÿ”ฅ. Ugh, what a complicated situation ๐Ÿคฏ!
 
I'm thinking, the US is getting serious about defending its interests in Asia... it's like they're saying "hey China, we know you're up to something, and we're not gonna take it lying down". ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’ช I'm a bit curious, what's the real deal here? Is it just a case of both sides trying to one-up each other, or is there actually some substance behind Hegseth's comments? ๐Ÿ’ญ I mean, $400 billion in defense spending sounds like a lot, but is it enough to keep up with China's growing military presence? ๐Ÿค”
 
man i cant wait for this new defense spending package to kick in ๐Ÿค‘ it's gonna be lit! $400 billion is a lot of cash, just think about all the advanced tech we're gonna get our hands on ๐Ÿ”ฅ cyber warfare programs, special ops forces... the possibilities are endless! and with china being such a threat on our waters, i'm all for Hegseth taking the lead and showing them who's boss ๐Ÿšฃโ€โ™‚๏ธ i just hope they don't mess up and escalate things further lol
 
idk about this new defense sec def pegseth tho ๐Ÿค”... seems like hes tryna flex his mil power lol. like, dont get me wrong, china's def getting all up in americas biz, but do we really need to go full blow warfare ๐Ÿ’ฃ? im not convinced he didnt just say that 2 make us sound cool ๐Ÿ˜‰. also $400 bil is a lotta cash, i hope its being used efectivly ๐Ÿคž... btw, cyber warfare capabilities r super importnt rn, chinese hackers r gettin real sneaky ๐Ÿ˜’. but can we pls have more transparency on whats goin down ๐Ÿ“?
 
๐Ÿค” It's interesting to see Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth taking a harder line against China, especially given the current tensions between the two nations. I think this shift in approach is likely a response to the growing concern about Chinese naval presence in international waters ๐ŸŒŠ. The increased military action and defense spending package ($400 billion) will undoubtedly have implications for global geopolitics.

What caught my attention was Hegseth's emphasis on cyber warfare capabilities โ€“ it highlights the evolving nature of national security threats ๐Ÿค–. While I'm not surprised by this focus, I do wonder if the administration is ready to invest in long-term solutions rather than just reacting to each new threat.
 
omg u think its gonna escalate with china?? ๐Ÿคฏ i mean dont get me wrong america needs to be strong but lets not jump into another cold war without thinking thru the consequences lol. what if we end up alienating more countries? ๐Ÿ’” im all for cyber security but can't we use diplomacy 2 avoid conflict? ๐Ÿšซ also $400 billion seems like a lil excessive tbh, dont get me wrong its needed but whats gonna happen 2 the people who r getting these funds?? ๐Ÿค‘
 
๐Ÿšจ Just read this interview with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ๐Ÿคฏ and I gotta say, it's like the US is finally waking up to the fact that China's been sneaking around in international waters ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ! $400 billion for defense spending? That's a whole lotta cash ๐Ÿ’ธ, but if it means we can stay one step ahead of those hackers and espionage campaigns, I'm all for it ๐Ÿ”’. It's like Hegseth said, strikes are just the beginning ๐Ÿšซ, we need to take a more proactive approach to national security and show China that we won't be caught off guard ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ. Plus, cyber warfare capabilities? That's the future of warfare ๐Ÿ’ป! Time to get tech-savvy and stay ahead of the game ๐ŸŽฎ #USDefense #CyberWarfare #ChinaThreat
 
Ugh, can we talk about the interview platform for a sec? I'm getting so tired of those awkward pauses and poor audio quality on CBS News' 'The Takeout'. It's like they're trying to make us feel like we're stuck in some kinda military briefing room . And don't even get me started on the lack of transcription. Who has time to rewind hours of an interview because there was a 3-second silence? ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ

Anyway, back to Hegseth's comments... I think it's about time someone took China seriously. The whole state-run espionage campaign thing is super concerning. But what really got me is how some people are already piling on the criticism of the admin for being "assertive" and "proactive". Um, isn't that just a fancy way of saying we need to step up our game? ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ”ฅ I'd rather see us focusing on actual solutions than getting bogged down in diplomatic quagmires. And can someone please tell me how much of those $400 billion defense funds are going towards actual soldier salaries? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿ’ฅ The US is getting serious about taking on China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ. I'm loving the $400 billion defense spending package - it's about time we stepped up our game. Advanced missile systems and cyber warfare programs? Yes, please! ๐Ÿค– We can't afford to sleepwalk into a security crisis. Pete Hegseth seems like he knows what he's doing, but you have to wonder if this is just a case of "stronger is better" without considering the long-term implications ๐Ÿ’ก.

I'm also kinda stoked that we're finally talking about cyber warfare - it's been a hot mess for years. I hope they actually follow through on some concrete plans and not just hype us up like before ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Overall, this sounds like a solid move to me... but let's see how it plays out ๐Ÿ’ช
 
I'm thinking, Pete Hegseth's comments about increasing military action against China are like, understandable ๐Ÿค”. We gotta take these maritime threats seriously, right? I mean, $400 billion is a lot of cash ๐Ÿ’ธ to put into defense spending, but it might be necessary if we wanna stay ahead of the curve. The thing is, though, Hegseth's comments about cyber warfare make me wonder... is this just a case of one side accusing the other of playing dirty? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ We should probably be having more open conversations with China about our differences instead of escalating tensions.
 
omg u guys i just got back from the most insane trip to asia last month ๐Ÿš€๐ŸŒ and i saw like literally EVERY ship on the seas with chinese flags on them ๐Ÿคฏ i was a bit worried for my own safety lol but then i realized that us is getting serious about defending its interests too ๐Ÿ’ช so maybe we can all just coexist peacefully? idk tho i do know that china's espionage campaign is super sketchy ๐Ÿ˜ณ and we need to be more proactive about stopping it. but at the same time, $400 billion is a LOT of money for defense spending ๐Ÿค‘ and i'm not sure if we're really seeing a return on investment yet. what do u guys think? should we just be chillin' with china or are they gonna keep testing our limits? ๐Ÿค”
 
I gotta wonder, what's the real cost of all this build-up? ๐Ÿค” Are we just trying to keep up with the times or are we truly preparing for the worst-case scenario? I mean, think about it, our military is like a big machine that needs constant fuel to run. And who's gonna pay for all those fancy missiles and cyber warfare programs? We're not getting any younger, folks! ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ We need to ask ourselves if this is really worth the investment. What are we trying to achieve here? Is it just about projecting power or is there something more at play? ๐Ÿค”
 
just when you think they're done with the hawkish approach ๐ŸฆŠ... pete hegseth is at it again. like, does anyone else remember what "the beginning" even means? we already know the game plan, and now he's just doubling down on it. 400 billion bucks for defense isn't gonna make china back down. btw, cyber warfare programs should be a thing of beauty... let's get the hacking skills up to par ๐Ÿค–
 
I'm calling BS on this Pete Hegseth guy... ๐Ÿค‘ I mean, $400 billion defense spending package? That sounds like a lot of money, but how much of it is actually going towards real-world problems, not just padding the Pentagon's pockets? ๐Ÿค” And what about those 'advanced missile systems' and cyber warfare programs? Are they really gonna make a difference against Chinese hackers or are they just another way to inflate defense contracts? ๐Ÿ’ธ It seems like we're just gearing up for more of the same old wars on words with China, rather than actually addressing the root causes of the issue. ๐ŸŒŽ
 
I'm telling you, this is exactly what I said would happen if we didn't take a harder stance on China ๐Ÿšจ. We can't just sit back and wait for them to make the first move. That's not how strong nations operate. Hegseth is right, increased military action is needed to protect our interests in international waters. It's about time someone took the reins and started making some real moves.

And let's be real, a $400 billion defense spending package is just the beginning. We need to start investing more in our military capabilities if we want to stay ahead of the curve. I'm not saying it's going to be easy or cheap, but it's worth it in the long run.

I just wish some people in Congress would get on board with Hegseth's plan. It feels like they're still stuck in the status quo mentality, playing it safe and waiting for someone else to make a move. Well, I'm here to tell you that the world doesn't work that way anymore ๐ŸŒŽ. We need to be bold, we need to be proactive, and we need to start taking China seriously.
 
Back
Top