Active travel groups call for clear targets on walking and cycling in England

Transport Secretary Under Fire to Set Clear Targets on Walking and Cycling in England

More than 50 groups connected to transport and public health are urging Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander to set specific targets for levels of walking and cycling in England. The groups argue that plans as they stand are too vague, contrasting with the long-term objectives and predictable funding cycles for other modes of transportation such as road and rail.

The letter, signed by prominent organizations including British Cycling, Cycling UK, and the National Trust, emphasizes the need for a clear, long-term national plan comparable to strategic transport programmes. It highlights that transport planners for established modes have confidence in their plans due to decades-long objectives and funding commitments, while active travel remains piecemeal despite making up nearly a third of all trips.

The government has promised unprecedented levels of funding for walking, wheeling, and cycling, with the consultation on the third cycling and walking investment strategy (CWIS3) set to bring about a "fundamental shift" in how active travel is treated. However, without clear targets, groups are warning that even the existing objective of making active travel safe, easy, and accessible by 2035 may be unachievable.

The letter calls for specific targets to be met by 2030, including that 50% of trips under five miles in towns and cities should be walked, wheeled, or cycled. It also argues for a national strategy for active travel networks, with coherent, connected, consistent, and accessible routes linking key destinations such as rail and bus stations, hospitals, and schools.

Critics argue that the Department for Transport's approach is less engaged with active travel than it was under its predecessor, with momentum being lost. The chief executive of Walk Wheel Cycle Trust, Xavier Brice, believes CWIS3 has failed to live up to its promise of shifting active travel from stop-start funding and priorities to a long-term framework.

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport claims that Β£616m has been committed to Active Travel England up to 2030, with the aim that walking, wheeling, and cycling will be easy, safe, and accessible by then. The department is now consulting on how to achieve this goal and encourages stakeholders and the public to have their say.
 
the way our transport secretary is handling the active travel plans is kinda weird πŸ€”. they're trying to make it sound like there's a clear plan in place, but groups are saying that it's all just piecemeal right now πŸ’ͺ. i get that it's better than nothing, but 50% of trips under five miles should def be walked or cycled by 2030 πŸš΄β€β™€οΈπŸ‘£... that's a pretty solid target if you ask me! what's concerning is that the department for transport seems to be moving slower than their predecessors 🐌. and Β£616m might sound like a lot, but when you're talking about making active travel safe, easy, and accessible, it feels like we need more πŸ’ΈπŸ’ͺ
 
I'm concerned about the lack of concrete targets for pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure in England πŸš—πŸ’¨. It's great that the government has committed Β£616m to Active Travel England, but setting specific goals would help ensure meaningful progress is made. I think it's essential to have a national strategy that prioritizes connected, accessible routes linking key destinations, making active travel an integral part of daily life. Without clear targets, we risk losing momentum and seeing the benefits of increased walking and cycling rates plateau. The existing 2035 objective might be ambitious, but with specific targets by 2030, I believe we can make a more substantial impact on reducing our reliance on cars.
 
OMG, like seriously can't believe what's goin' on in England rn πŸ™„. These groups are literally beggin' for clear targets on walking & cycling, but noooo the gov just gives vague promises. I mean, come on, if you're gonna give us money, at least give us some actual goals to work towards πŸ€‘. 50% of trips under five miles should be walked or cycled by 2030? That's doable! And a national strategy for active travel networks sounds like a total no-brainer πŸ’‘. I'm all for it, but the gov needs to step up their game if they wanna actually make a change πŸ€”.
 
OMG 🀯 I'm like totally shocked that the Transport Secretary isn't setting clear targets for walking and cycling in England yet! Like, what's up with that? πŸ€” It's not like they're gonna magic up a national plan out of thin air 🎩. The groups are totally right, it needs to be concrete and specific, like 50% of trips under five miles should be walked, wheeled, or cycled by 2030 πŸ’ͺ. And can we get some coherence with active travel networks already? Like, rail stations to hospitals, schools, and bus stops need to connect πŸš‚πŸ’¨. This CWIS3 thingy sounds so promising but I need to see the numbers πŸ“Š. Can't wait for the consultation, I'll def be submitting my thoughts πŸ—£οΈ.
 
its like theyre not learnin from previous govts πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. remember when london was supposed to get a cycle superhighway? that was over 10 yrs ago. they promised so much but didnt deliver. now theyre tryin to set targets and stuff, but its just too vague. i think they should be more specific like "make cycling safe for all ages by 2028" or somethin πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ
 
It's kinda sus that they're promising so much funding for active travel but still can't even agree on some basic targets πŸ€”πŸ’Έ I mean, 50% of trips under five miles should be walkable or cyclable by 2030? That's doable, right? But if they can't even get that sorted out, how are we gonna hit the goal of making active travel safe and easy for everyone by 2035? πŸš΄β€β™€οΈπŸ‘Ž
 
πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈπŸ˜¬ transport secretary needs to step up her game if we wanna see more people ditchin' cars for bikes & walks! 🌳 50% of trips under 5 miles should be on two wheels or foot, stat! πŸ•’ 2030 deadline is a good start, but it's not just about funding, it's about creating a network of safe routes that connect everything. πŸ—ΊοΈ #active travel now πŸ‘‰
 
man it's crazy how everything has changed since I was a kid 🀯 i remember my parents used to cycle everywhere we lived in a small village where everyone walked or cycled to school or to do shopping πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ the thought of having specific targets for walking and cycling is kinda refreshing but at the same time it's like they're trying to put all their eggs in one basket πŸ₯š what if CWIS3 doesn't deliver? i think 50% of trips under five miles should be walked, wheeled, or cycled that's a pretty achievable goal imo πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” I think its weird that transport planners are making things harder for people to walk or cycle by not having a clear plan πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈ. We already know there's gonna be more funding for active travel, so why not set some actual targets? 50% of trips under five miles should definitely be on two wheels πŸ˜‚. And what's with the lack of a national strategy for active travel networks? It's like they're expecting us to just magically build these awesome bike lanes and paths πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ. Come on, let's get some momentum going on this! πŸ’¨
 
omg πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ cant believe gov is being so vague about targets 4 walking n cycling! they r all talkin bout makin it safe n accessible by 2035 but wot actual targets? like, how many miles shd we be walkin or cyclin each year? need som clear numbers n a plan πŸ€”. CWIS3 promised alot but its just stop-start funding n priorities. needs a real strategy 4 active travel networks too. 50% of trips under 5 miles shd b on foot or bike, no way arond that πŸš΄β€β™€οΈπŸ’¨
 
I think it's super weird that they're promising so much funding for walking & cycling but don't have a clear plan πŸ€”... like, we get it, active travel matters, but setting some actual targets would be a good starting point πŸ’ͺ. This is kinda like trying to build a house without knowing where the foundation is 🏠. If they want to make active travel safe, easy & accessible by 2035, I'd expect them to at least set some specific goals for now πŸ”΄. Maybe if they had a clear plan, more people would get excited about it? 🀞
 
I'm really worried about this one 😬... I mean, they're promising more funding for walking and cycling but it's all just empty promises if we don't have any real targets to aim for πŸ€”. 50% of trips under five miles should be on foot or bike by 2030? That's a pretty big ask! πŸ’ͺ What really gets me is that they're not being more direct about what they want to achieve, it's all just vague words like "fundamental shift" πŸ“ˆ... give me some concrete numbers and goals, you know? πŸ”₯
 
πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ like it's kinda weird they're already promising more funding for active travel but don't have specific targets... πŸ€” 50% of trips under five miles should be walked, wheeled or cycled by 2030 that sounds doable right? πŸ’ͺ

i'm also getting frustrated with the department not engaging as much as they used to with active travel πŸš— less momentum is being lost and it's really impacting the progress we were making 🌎
 
I gotta say, I'm really surprised they're not pushing for more concrete targets πŸ€”. I mean, we've got Β£616m allocated up to 2030, which sounds like a good chunk of change, but it's still too vague if you ask me πŸ’Έ. What does "easy, safe, and accessible" even mean in practice? You need some real numbers and timelines to make progress on this stuff πŸ“ˆ.

And let's be real, the lack of clear targets is gonna slow down momentum 🚫. Without a national plan that's comparable to other modes of transportation, it's just gonna be piecemeal stuff happening here and there, which isn't exactly what we need πŸŒ†. We need to make walking and cycling the norm, not some nice-to-have.

I think 50% of trips under five miles in towns and cities should be walked, wheeled, or cycled by 2030 is a great target πŸ”₯. It's achievable, it's realistic, and it's something we can actually measure progress on πŸ“Š. We need to get back to the drawing board and make sure our goals are aligned with what we're trying to achieve πŸ’‘.

It's also interesting that the Department for Transport seems to be taking a more laissez-faire approach compared to its predecessor πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. I'm not saying they didn't do anything, but this CWIS3 thing needs some real teeth if it wants to make a difference πŸ”ͺ. We need to hold them accountable and get some concrete plans in place πŸ’―.
 
πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ I think it's wild that they're already making plans for 2030 but don't have specific targets set in stone yet πŸ€”. Like, what's the point of investing all that money if we can't even guarantee people will be walking or cycling by then? πŸ€‘ We need some concrete numbers and goals here, you know? πŸ’ͺ And I'm all for creating those active travel networks - it'd make life so much easier to get around without cars πŸš—. Let's hope they listen to the groups that are trying to push them towards this πŸ™
 
I'm worried about these groups going back & forth like this πŸ€”. On one hand, I get why they wanna see clear targets - it's all about accountability, you know? But at the same time, Β£616m is a decent chunk of change πŸ’Έ, and I think we can make some progress without being too prescriptive. What if we focus on creating a national strategy that's more flexible & adaptable to different areas & needs? That way, everyone can still have a say & contribute 🀝. It's not about being vague or lacking ambition - it's about making sure we're using the right tools for the job πŸ’‘. Let's see if we can find a middle ground that works for everyone πŸ“Š.
 
πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈ I think it's crazy that there's so much fuss about setting clear targets for walking and cycling in England. We're already talking about making active travel safe, easy, and accessible by 2035 - why do we need even more specificity? πŸ€” Moreover, the amount of funding promised (Β£616m) seems like a lot to me, considering that active travel only makes up nearly a third of all trips. Shouldn't we be aiming higher than just 50% of short trips being walked or cycled by 2030? πŸš— I'm not sure what's more concerning - the lack of clear targets or the fact that there seems to be less engagement from the Department for Transport on active travel compared to other modes of transportation. Either way, it feels like we're missing an opportunity to create a cohesive national plan that prioritizes our health and well-being. 🌟
 
πŸ€” idk why they need targets set in stone... like, can't we just make active travel cool and all that? πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ it's not like people are gonna magically start walking or cycling everywhere just because some gov't says so πŸ˜‚ anyway, Β£616m sounds like a decent start but 50% of trips under five miles should be a pretty achievable goal if they put their mind to it... or is that too ambitious? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
Back
Top