New York City's Police Department has installed a camera directly outside the bedroom window of Pamela Wridt and Robert Sauve, a couple living in Brooklyn. This is not an isolated incident, as tens of thousands of cameras are part of a massive surveillance system that feeds data to the police department. The Domain Awareness System allows the NYPD to collect information on individuals' identities, daily movements, social media activity, and personal associations.
The couple claims their right to privacy has been violated by the presence of this camera. "It can see potentially directly into any part of our house," Sauve said. Wridt also expressed her concern about the impact of the surveillance system on her mental health and well-being. She noted that they had to mirror-tint all windows, unable to open them due to exposure.
This case marks the first lawsuit against the NYPD's expansive surveillance machine, which has raised concerns over its constitutionality. The plaintiffs' attorneys argue that the system enables police departments across the United States to collect personal data on millions of people without their consent.
The Domain Awareness System is comprised of various technologies, including video cameras, tracking systems, biometric tools, and financial analytics. Private companies like Microsoft and Clearview AI provide resources for this surveillance network. The system has been linked to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, sparking concerns about data sharing with other government agencies.
Attorney Albert Cahn stated that "American policing runs on data" and described the NYPD as a model for other police departments across the country, which are increasingly acting like intelligence agencies. This highlights the growing concern over police surveillance networks across the United States.
A federal lawsuit filed by Wridt and Sauve seeks to address these concerns, aiming to protect New Yorkers' constitutional rights to freedom of association, expression, and privacy.
The couple claims their right to privacy has been violated by the presence of this camera. "It can see potentially directly into any part of our house," Sauve said. Wridt also expressed her concern about the impact of the surveillance system on her mental health and well-being. She noted that they had to mirror-tint all windows, unable to open them due to exposure.
This case marks the first lawsuit against the NYPD's expansive surveillance machine, which has raised concerns over its constitutionality. The plaintiffs' attorneys argue that the system enables police departments across the United States to collect personal data on millions of people without their consent.
The Domain Awareness System is comprised of various technologies, including video cameras, tracking systems, biometric tools, and financial analytics. Private companies like Microsoft and Clearview AI provide resources for this surveillance network. The system has been linked to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, sparking concerns about data sharing with other government agencies.
Attorney Albert Cahn stated that "American policing runs on data" and described the NYPD as a model for other police departments across the country, which are increasingly acting like intelligence agencies. This highlights the growing concern over police surveillance networks across the United States.
A federal lawsuit filed by Wridt and Sauve seeks to address these concerns, aiming to protect New Yorkers' constitutional rights to freedom of association, expression, and privacy.