Brooklyn's Bedford Avenue bike lanes remain a contentious issue as Mayor Zohran Mamdani pushes to complete the project. The 3-block stretch of unprotected bike lane has pitted the neighborhood's powerful Orthodox Jewish community against street safety advocates who see Mamdani as an ally.
The bike lane controversy began last summer when former Mayor Eric Adams abruptly removed a section of protected bike lane between Willoughby and Flushing Avenues in an apparent bid to win support from the Orthodox Jewish community. The move came after an e-bike rider slammed into a small child in the bike lane, sparking widespread outrage.
Mamdani has since criticized Adams for prioritizing special interests over street safety projects. However, he also accepted key endorsements from influential figures within the community, including Rabbi Moishe Indig, who lobbied Adams to kill the protected bike lane.
Street safety advocates and activists are now waiting to see what Mamdani will do next. Some, like Ben Furnas of Transportation Alternatives, are willing to negotiate and find solutions that balance street use with community concerns. Others, however, are more critical, urging Mamdani to move aggressively on the project to avoid further delays.
The fate of the Bedford Avenue bike lane is a microcosm of the complex relationships between local politics, community interests, and transportation policy in New York City. As Mamdani navigates this issue, he faces pressure from both sides, with some viewing him as an ally committed to street safety and others seeing him as beholden to special interests.
In a city where bike lanes are increasingly seen as essential infrastructure, the outcome of this controversy could have broader implications for urban planning and transportation policy in Brooklyn.
The bike lane controversy began last summer when former Mayor Eric Adams abruptly removed a section of protected bike lane between Willoughby and Flushing Avenues in an apparent bid to win support from the Orthodox Jewish community. The move came after an e-bike rider slammed into a small child in the bike lane, sparking widespread outrage.
Mamdani has since criticized Adams for prioritizing special interests over street safety projects. However, he also accepted key endorsements from influential figures within the community, including Rabbi Moishe Indig, who lobbied Adams to kill the protected bike lane.
Street safety advocates and activists are now waiting to see what Mamdani will do next. Some, like Ben Furnas of Transportation Alternatives, are willing to negotiate and find solutions that balance street use with community concerns. Others, however, are more critical, urging Mamdani to move aggressively on the project to avoid further delays.
The fate of the Bedford Avenue bike lane is a microcosm of the complex relationships between local politics, community interests, and transportation policy in New York City. As Mamdani navigates this issue, he faces pressure from both sides, with some viewing him as an ally committed to street safety and others seeing him as beholden to special interests.
In a city where bike lanes are increasingly seen as essential infrastructure, the outcome of this controversy could have broader implications for urban planning and transportation policy in Brooklyn.
it's crazy how some people can say they want what's best for the community, but really they're just trying to protect their own interests 
... i mean, think about it - if you're gonna make a decision that affects everyone, shouldn't it be based on what's right for most people? not just what's good for your specific group 
. and honestly, it feels like we're always gotta navigate these super delicate balances between different groups 
... but ultimately, the bike lane is about making our city a safer, more livable place for everyone 
the whole thing feels like drama 
. Orthodox Jewish community thinks they're above the law or something? come on 
. street safety advocates are right tho, bike lanes r getting more important by the day 
. we need to find a balance between community concerns and infrastructure needs. Mamdani should just get on with it 
& not let ppl like Rabbi Indig sway him 
.
. We need more of that collaborative approach in our city planning process... 
. But sometimes you gotta take a step back and think about the bigger picture before rushing into things.
. But with some thoughtful discussions and compromises, we can create cities that are safe, sustainable, and work for everyone 
!
. The fact that Adams removed a protected section last summer was a huge red flag. Mamdani's attempt to curry favor with influential figures in the community by accepting endorsements from Rabbi Indig and others might be seen as pandering 
.
.
. Maybe we can finally have a real discussion about bike lanes and safety without all the politics involved 
. Mayor Mamdani seems like he's trying to do the right thing, but it feels like every step forward is met with resistance from certain groups 
. I just hope he finds a way to balance everyone's concerns and gets the project done without dragging it out any further 
. It's not rocket science - if you're going to share the road, we need some basic safety features in place 
. It's like the politicians are more worried about winning over the community than actually making streets safer for everyone. I mean, come on, a section of bike lane got removed because of one accident? That's just it, accidents happen! But the fact that they're still debating whether to finish the project shows how caught up they are in playing politics 
.
. The thing is, it's not just about the bike lane – it's about the city's overall transportation policy.
the bike lane situation is so frustrating! 
The community should be all about safety, right? 
Not getting bogged down by special interests, though... 
but it's hard when people are being super polarized 
. The city needs more bike lanes, like, stat! 
It's the future of urban planning, dude! 
. On the other hand, I can see why the Orthodox Jewish community is being extra cautious – it's NYC, after all! We've got a lot of competing interests here.
Either way, I'm here for it because it's gonna be interesting! 
I'm all for finding solutions that work for everyone, but sometimes you gotta take a stand and say "enough is enough" 
... what's the point of having bike lanes if it's just gonna be a revolving door for special interests? 
.
, and Bike Lanes 
.
. It's like he's trying to prove a point, you know? The whole thing with former Mayor Adams removing the protected bike lane was wild 
. If Mamdani can navigate this issue successfully, it could have big implications for urban planning and transportation policy in Brooklyn 
. Fingers crossed he gets it done! 
AS LONG AS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT KIDS AND BICYCLES BEING HURT, MAYOR MAMDANI SHOULD BE ALL FOR IT!!!