I don’t usually comment but… I feel bad for Clemens and Bonds. They've been playing the game for so long and it's a shame that their careers are being judged by something that happened outside of the diamond 
. I mean, we all know some players took steroids back in the day, but does that really disqualify them from being great players? I think it's great that Kent is getting recognized for his achievements on the field, though! He's definitely a deserving candidate 
. The new rules at the Hall of Fame are kinda harsh, though. It feels like they're trying to make it too easy for voters to dismiss candidates who might have been worthy players 
.
. I mean, we all know some players took steroids back in the day, but does that really disqualify them from being great players? I think it's great that Kent is getting recognized for his achievements on the field, though! He's definitely a deserving candidate . The new rules at the Hall of Fame are kinda harsh, though. It feels like they're trying to make it too easy for voters to dismiss candidates who might have been worthy players .
. kent being inducted is cool tho, he played some great ball and owning up to his mistakes shows some character 
. but clemens and bonds are still super talented guys who deserve some love, even if they're not 100% clean 
And what's with the new rules? I don't think they needed to make it so hard for players to get in. 
Jeff Kent's case is a good example of how some players can redeem themselves after making mistakes, but then again Clemens and Bonds have always been a bit of a controversy... 
. I mean, they've been dodging allegations about steroids for years, and it's just a matter of time before their names are tainted forever 
. The new rules might be an attempt to clean up the game, but it's also kinda like a death sentence – all or nothing. I'm not sure if Kent deserves his induction spot just yet 
. Can't we give players a second chance? Or are we just gonna keep judging them based on their past mistakes?