Eagles' Financial Flexibility Enables Trade of A.J. Brown, Despite Significant Cap Hit
The Philadelphia Eagles are set to make significant decisions in the coming months, and one of the key questions on their offseason agenda is what to do with A.J. Brown. The star wide receiver signed a three-year extension worth $92 million during the 2024 offseason, but his unhappy tenure has raised concerns about trading him.
From a financial perspective, trading Brown could be feasible for the Eagles. If he's dealt before June 1, the team would incur a dead cap charge of $43,515,106, while keeping him would result in a cap hit of $23,393,497. However, this is not as daunting a prospect as it initially seems.
In fact, the Eagles have consistently demonstrated an ability to structure player contracts in a way that allows them to maintain flexibility on the salary cap. A key example is Mekhi Becton, who signed with the team in 2024 on a one-year deal worth about $5.5 million. Despite counting for only $2 million on the cap in his first year with the Eagles, Becton's remaining salary would be carried over to the following season due to the NFL's salary cap structure.
This approach allows teams like the Eagles to borrow from future years to expand their current spending ability without incurring interest penalties. The Eagles have employed this strategy with nearly every player they sign, including drafted rookies and players making league minimums.
In Brown's case, his contract extension included a significant dead cap hit on the back end. However, trading him would not be as costly for the team as it initially appears. By moving Brown before June 1, the Eagles would avoid $20 million in cash payouts to him, including $9 million in 2026.
The long-term financial benefits of trading Brown are substantial. Without him on the roster, the Eagles could save over $44 million per season from 2027 to 2029, when he is scheduled to count for a total of $133,121,609 on the cap during those three seasons combined. This represents a significant amount of money that can be allocated towards signing young star defensive players like Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean.
Ultimately, trading A.J. Brown would put a dent in the Eagles' 2026 cap, but the financial benefits and flexibility offered by their salary cap structure make it a viable option. The team's willingness to structure contracts in a way that allows them to maintain flexibility on the salary cap has proven successful time and again, making it likely that they can navigate the challenges of trading Brown without significant long-term consequences.
The Philadelphia Eagles are set to make significant decisions in the coming months, and one of the key questions on their offseason agenda is what to do with A.J. Brown. The star wide receiver signed a three-year extension worth $92 million during the 2024 offseason, but his unhappy tenure has raised concerns about trading him.
From a financial perspective, trading Brown could be feasible for the Eagles. If he's dealt before June 1, the team would incur a dead cap charge of $43,515,106, while keeping him would result in a cap hit of $23,393,497. However, this is not as daunting a prospect as it initially seems.
In fact, the Eagles have consistently demonstrated an ability to structure player contracts in a way that allows them to maintain flexibility on the salary cap. A key example is Mekhi Becton, who signed with the team in 2024 on a one-year deal worth about $5.5 million. Despite counting for only $2 million on the cap in his first year with the Eagles, Becton's remaining salary would be carried over to the following season due to the NFL's salary cap structure.
This approach allows teams like the Eagles to borrow from future years to expand their current spending ability without incurring interest penalties. The Eagles have employed this strategy with nearly every player they sign, including drafted rookies and players making league minimums.
In Brown's case, his contract extension included a significant dead cap hit on the back end. However, trading him would not be as costly for the team as it initially appears. By moving Brown before June 1, the Eagles would avoid $20 million in cash payouts to him, including $9 million in 2026.
The long-term financial benefits of trading Brown are substantial. Without him on the roster, the Eagles could save over $44 million per season from 2027 to 2029, when he is scheduled to count for a total of $133,121,609 on the cap during those three seasons combined. This represents a significant amount of money that can be allocated towards signing young star defensive players like Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean.
Ultimately, trading A.J. Brown would put a dent in the Eagles' 2026 cap, but the financial benefits and flexibility offered by their salary cap structure make it a viable option. The team's willingness to structure contracts in a way that allows them to maintain flexibility on the salary cap has proven successful time and again, making it likely that they can navigate the challenges of trading Brown without significant long-term consequences.