Corporate America's Silence on Gun Reform is Frustrating CEOs
The recent mass shooting in Nashville has left many Americans wondering why corporate executives are not speaking out more forcefully on gun control legislation. In fact, the nation's top CEOs seem to be growing increasingly frustrated with their own silence.
For years, corporate leaders have been vocal on issues such as climate change, diversity and inclusion, and social justice. They've even called for stricter gun laws in the past, stating that they're a "public health crisis." However, since the latest mass school shooting, many of these same executives seem to be holding their tongues.
"It's like we're turning to them to be our saviors on every topic," says Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has a direct line to major CEOs around the globe. "They've joined causes with valor and nobility, but they can't just take cause after cause as if there's nobody else in society."
According to Sonnenfeld, CEOs are waiting for everyone else - including civil society, student activists, and politicians - to join them on gun reform efforts. They don't need to restate something that has already been said; their frustration stems from the lack of collective action.
The misconception that CEOs hold significant influence over campaign contributions is also being challenged by Sonnenfeld. Since the 2020 elections, much less campaign money has come from big business, and many companies have either imposed moratoriums or given mere pennies to politicians in response to the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack.
The numbers don't back up talk of strong demand for Tesla products, either. Despite a modest 4% rise in sales in the first quarter, Tesla produced more vehicles than it delivered to customers for the fourth consecutive quarter. The company attributes this discrepancy to increased production at new factories and a lag between that increased production and sales.
As CEOs continue to weigh their options on gun reform, they're also left wondering if anyone else is ready to join them in advocating for change.
The recent mass shooting in Nashville has left many Americans wondering why corporate executives are not speaking out more forcefully on gun control legislation. In fact, the nation's top CEOs seem to be growing increasingly frustrated with their own silence.
For years, corporate leaders have been vocal on issues such as climate change, diversity and inclusion, and social justice. They've even called for stricter gun laws in the past, stating that they're a "public health crisis." However, since the latest mass school shooting, many of these same executives seem to be holding their tongues.
"It's like we're turning to them to be our saviors on every topic," says Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has a direct line to major CEOs around the globe. "They've joined causes with valor and nobility, but they can't just take cause after cause as if there's nobody else in society."
According to Sonnenfeld, CEOs are waiting for everyone else - including civil society, student activists, and politicians - to join them on gun reform efforts. They don't need to restate something that has already been said; their frustration stems from the lack of collective action.
The misconception that CEOs hold significant influence over campaign contributions is also being challenged by Sonnenfeld. Since the 2020 elections, much less campaign money has come from big business, and many companies have either imposed moratoriums or given mere pennies to politicians in response to the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack.
The numbers don't back up talk of strong demand for Tesla products, either. Despite a modest 4% rise in sales in the first quarter, Tesla produced more vehicles than it delivered to customers for the fourth consecutive quarter. The company attributes this discrepancy to increased production at new factories and a lag between that increased production and sales.
As CEOs continue to weigh their options on gun reform, they're also left wondering if anyone else is ready to join them in advocating for change.