The article discusses the different approaches to achieving sustainable economic growth, including post-growth economics. Post-growth economics is a school of thought that argues that continued growth is not possible while keeping within the planet's boundaries.
The article highlights three families of ecological economics: green Keynesians, green capitalists, and post-growth economists. Each family has its own approach to achieving sustainable economic growth.
Green Keynesians believe that green growth is possible through state-led transition, with policies such as carbon pricing, deregulation of green industries, and public-private partnerships. They also advocate for a "green new deal" and increased public investment in renewable energy and infrastructure.
Green capitalists, on the other hand, believe that market reforms and technology can deliver sustainable growth. They argue that innovation offers a way out of environmental challenges and that carbon pricing and deregulation of green industries are essential for achieving sustainability.
Post-growth economists, by contrast, disagree on the need for continued growth and argue that it is incompatible with reducing greenhouse gas emissions and avoiding climate change. They propose alternative measures of prosperity, such as wellbeing and happiness, rather than GDP.
The article also notes that the de-growth movement, which advocates for radical scaling down of production and consumption, has been a prominent incarnation of post-growth economics. Some proponents of this approach argue that the scenario in Limits to Growth is already playing out or will soon do so, pointing to long-term productivity slowdowns and low growth in many western economies.
Overall, the article suggests that there are different perspectives on achieving sustainable economic growth, and that policymakers must consider these approaches when developing policies to address climate change.
The article highlights three families of ecological economics: green Keynesians, green capitalists, and post-growth economists. Each family has its own approach to achieving sustainable economic growth.
Green Keynesians believe that green growth is possible through state-led transition, with policies such as carbon pricing, deregulation of green industries, and public-private partnerships. They also advocate for a "green new deal" and increased public investment in renewable energy and infrastructure.
Green capitalists, on the other hand, believe that market reforms and technology can deliver sustainable growth. They argue that innovation offers a way out of environmental challenges and that carbon pricing and deregulation of green industries are essential for achieving sustainability.
Post-growth economists, by contrast, disagree on the need for continued growth and argue that it is incompatible with reducing greenhouse gas emissions and avoiding climate change. They propose alternative measures of prosperity, such as wellbeing and happiness, rather than GDP.
The article also notes that the de-growth movement, which advocates for radical scaling down of production and consumption, has been a prominent incarnation of post-growth economics. Some proponents of this approach argue that the scenario in Limits to Growth is already playing out or will soon do so, pointing to long-term productivity slowdowns and low growth in many western economies.
Overall, the article suggests that there are different perspectives on achieving sustainable economic growth, and that policymakers must consider these approaches when developing policies to address climate change.
... i mean, i get it, we can't keep growing like we're crazy or the planet's gonna be toast, but do we have to stop growing all together? 
couldnt we just find a way to balance our economies with the environment? 
it seems like some of these green capitalists are just trying to save their businesses 
... and what about the wellbeing approach? is that really what prosperity looks like nowdays? 
. I mean, don't get me wrong, sustainability is super important, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater just yet. I'm all for innovation and market reforms, and I think green Keynesians have some solid ideas on how to make sustainable growth work. It's not like we can't keep growing while still taking care of the planet - it's about finding that sweet spot where everyone benefits 
. Implementing carbon pricing and investing in renewable energy seems like a no-brainer for our future planet 
.
. And yeah, it's crazy how some people are already predicting productivity slowdowns and low growth - maybe we need to think outside the box (or in this case, outside the economy) 
.
. Let's keep sharing our thoughts and ideas - who knows what kind of innovative solutions will come out of it? 
? Like, what's the point of having all this stuff if it's just gonna ruin the planet?
I mean, who needs GDP when we've got actual happiness levels and life expectancy rates to measure success? But at the same time, I can see why some people would be like "but what about all these green industries we need to grow for jobs?" 
. But post-growth economists make so much sense too - who needs growth when we can focus on wellbeing and happiness, right? 
I mean, I've been reading about this limits to growth thing and it's like, really scary... but it also makes me think that we need to rethink our priorities 
!
. The green Keynesians and green capitalists have some valid points, and I love how post-growth economists are pushing for a more holistic definition of prosperity. We need to prioritize wellbeing and happiness over GDP growth - that's what the 'Ok Boomer' generation would say 
? But at the same time, I feel like post-growth economists are right to question our priorities - what's the point of all this growth if we're just gonna end up with a messed up planet and a bunch of unhappy people? 
.
It makes me realize that there's no one-size-fits-all solution to this problem.
The de-growth movement is just a fancy way of saying "we're too lazy to do anything about it".