Elon Musk's New Wikipedia Alternative is More Propaganda Than Truth
In a bid to distance himself from what he perceives as the "woke" culture of Wikipedia, Elon Musk has launched his own alternative encyclopedia called Grok. But instead of promoting fact-based knowledge, it seems that Grok is serving up a different kind of propaganda - one that advances far-right narratives and erodes critical thinking.
Grok's entry on Adolf Hitler is just the latest example of this trend. Originally written as "Adolf Hitler was the Austrian-born Führer of Germany from 1933 to 1945," the page has been edited to downplay the significance of his role in perpetrating genocide. Instead, Grok describes him as an "Austrian-born German politician and dictator," but fails to mention the Holocaust until well into the 13,000-word entry.
But what's most concerning is not just this particular example, but the broader implications of a system that relies on AI-generated content to spread misinformation. According to researcher Hal Triedman, Grok cites the white supremacist blog at least 42 times, suggesting a systematic effort to promote extremist ideologies under the guise of objectivity.
The problem with Grok isn't just its lack of transparency or accountability; it's also its capacity to undermine our shared reality. By presenting alternative narratives as fact-based and authoritative, Grok is essentially creating a world where truth is whatever it wants it to be. This is precisely what makes it so unsettling - not because it's an egregious example of propaganda, but because it's a low-effort, lazily designed system that exploits our trust in authority.
As LK Seiling, an AI researcher at the Weizenbaum Institute, notes, "Musk does not have armies of people writing pages. What he <em>does</em> have is a shit-ton of GPUs." This highlights the stark contrast between Wikipedia's transparent and auditable governance structure and Grok's reliance on technology to spread ideology.
In the end, it's not just about the content that Grok produces; it's about what kind of system we're creating when we allow AI-generated propaganda to masquerade as truth. As Seiling warns, "No longer do you need a cadre of bureaucrats or the Heritage Foundation to rewrite history books; a metric ton of processing power to help launder ideology through the aesthetics of objectivity suffices." The question is: what kind of reality are we building when we let this happen?
In a bid to distance himself from what he perceives as the "woke" culture of Wikipedia, Elon Musk has launched his own alternative encyclopedia called Grok. But instead of promoting fact-based knowledge, it seems that Grok is serving up a different kind of propaganda - one that advances far-right narratives and erodes critical thinking.
Grok's entry on Adolf Hitler is just the latest example of this trend. Originally written as "Adolf Hitler was the Austrian-born Führer of Germany from 1933 to 1945," the page has been edited to downplay the significance of his role in perpetrating genocide. Instead, Grok describes him as an "Austrian-born German politician and dictator," but fails to mention the Holocaust until well into the 13,000-word entry.
But what's most concerning is not just this particular example, but the broader implications of a system that relies on AI-generated content to spread misinformation. According to researcher Hal Triedman, Grok cites the white supremacist blog at least 42 times, suggesting a systematic effort to promote extremist ideologies under the guise of objectivity.
The problem with Grok isn't just its lack of transparency or accountability; it's also its capacity to undermine our shared reality. By presenting alternative narratives as fact-based and authoritative, Grok is essentially creating a world where truth is whatever it wants it to be. This is precisely what makes it so unsettling - not because it's an egregious example of propaganda, but because it's a low-effort, lazily designed system that exploits our trust in authority.
As LK Seiling, an AI researcher at the Weizenbaum Institute, notes, "Musk does not have armies of people writing pages. What he <em>does</em> have is a shit-ton of GPUs." This highlights the stark contrast between Wikipedia's transparent and auditable governance structure and Grok's reliance on technology to spread ideology.
In the end, it's not just about the content that Grok produces; it's about what kind of system we're creating when we allow AI-generated propaganda to masquerade as truth. As Seiling warns, "No longer do you need a cadre of bureaucrats or the Heritage Foundation to rewrite history books; a metric ton of processing power to help launder ideology through the aesthetics of objectivity suffices." The question is: what kind of reality are we building when we let this happen?
. It seems like he's just spreading misinformation and propaganda instead of telling the truth. I mean, who edits a page on Hitler to downplay the Holocaust? That's not right at all 
. And what's even scarier is that it's using AI-generated content to spread extremist ideas. That's like giving algorithms free rein to manipulate us 
. We need reliable sources of information, not some made-up truth that's just to suit someone's agenda. Can we trust Grok? I don't think so 
.
. This whole Grok thing is like a bad parody of Wikipedia - except instead of being transparent and well-sourced, it's just regurgitating far-right nonsense and passing it off as fact. And don't even get me started on the AI-generated content thing... what's next, AI-written history books that rewrite the past to fit Musk's agenda? 
It's like he's trying to create a dystopian reality where truth is whatever he says it is, and we're all just too stupid to notice. Sorry, Elon, but your " Grok" isn't fooling anyone 
and I gotta say, it's kinda mind-blowing how easily he can manipulate info to suit his agenda. Like, who needs fact-checking when you've got AI on your side? 
It's not like we're living in a sci-fi movie where the bad guy just pulls off this crazy hack to control people's minds... yet 
situation where anyone can just jump in and start spreading whatever they want.
.
.
. Anyone can input biased info and voilà! You've got yourself a fake Wikipedia 
. Like, no, dude, having powerful computers doesn't make up for bad journalism 
.
. I mean, who needs critical thinking when you can just regurgitate whatever Musk spews out? 
. And you know what the scariest part is? He's using AI-generated content to do it 
. Like, have you seen how easily that stuff can be manipulated? It's like a game of cat and mouse where one side gets to rewrite history 
. The fact that they're citing white supremacist blogs on Grok is just mind-blowing 
. What kind of sick logic does it take to ignore the Holocaust and just gloss over it in 13,000 words? It's like they want us to forget the past or something 
. And what's with the GPUs thing? Like, yeah sure Elon has a lot of processing power but that doesn't make his project any less problematic 
, especially when it comes to AI-generated content 
.
. I mean, the fact that AI-generated content is being used to spread extremist ideologies is just insane 
.
. 100 GPUs? That's not governance, that's just a fancy excuse for "we didn't care enough to fact-check" 
.
. Let's keep our wits about us and don't let the likes of Grok get away with this nonsense 
. I mean, who needs fact-based knowledge when you can just spread propaganda and misinformation 
. And the AI-generated content thing is super sketchy too 
.
. If we start believing that propaganda can be presented as fact, where do we draw the line? When does "alternative perspective" become outright misinformation? 
.
.
. I'm not saying we should be paranoid or anything, but shouldn't we be worried that our information is being manipulated by someone with such a vested interest in shaping public opinion? It's like, what's next? A fake news network run by a billionaire tech mogul 
? This whole thing just makes me think about the responsibility that comes with having so much power and influence 
. I mean, Wikipedia might not be perfect, but at least it has people vetting the info and making sure it's accurate. Grok seems like a bad idea to me 
it's like, come on dude! how hard is it to get a few million people involved in making content accurate? 
. And what's up with Grok's Adolf Hitler entry tho? Like, don't get me wrong, the dude was super problematic, but downplaying his role in genocide is straight-up revisionist history 
. And to make matters worse, it's citing white supremacist blogs like they're legit sources 
. and 13k words on adolf hitler and not even a mention of the holocaust? what's next, rewriting history books with your tesla-powered magic 8 ball 
? meanwhile wikipeidia's got a governance structure that's like, way more transparent than your gpu-powered propaganda mill 
?
.