Elon Musk’s Twitter promised a purge of blue check marks. Instead he singled out one account | CNN Business

Elon Musk's Twitter Purge: A Misfire or Masterstroke?

When Elon Musk announced that his Twitter would be purging blue check marks, the move was expected to impact a wide range of verified users. However, instead of enforcing the purge across the board, it appears that the billionaire has singled out one account - that of the New York Times.

The move has raised eyebrows and sparked confusion among users, as most legacy blue check holders were not affected by the purge. Instead, their verification marks were simply appended with a new label reading: "This account is verified because it's subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account." This label makes it unclear whether verified accounts are actually notable individuals or simply users who have paid to join Twitter Blue.

The move appears to be aimed at the New York Times, which had previously told CNN that it would not pay for verification. The newspaper's main account lost its blue check mark over the weekend, while its other accounts, such as those for its arts, travel, and books content, remained verified.

Musk responded to the Times' loss of its blue check with a tweet saying "Oh ok, we'll take it off then." He also lashed out at the newspaper in a series of tweets, claiming that its coverage is boring and "propaganda."

The move highlights how Musk often appears to guide decisions about Twitter by whim rather than policy. The new label could risk making it easier for people to scam or impersonate high-profile users, while experts have also questioned whether reserving verification for paid users will reduce the number of bots on the site.

Musk has previously presented changes to Twitter's verification system as a way of "treating everyone equally." However, the move appears to be driven by revenue considerations, with Musk seeking to monetize the blue check mark feature.

The price of dogecoin, which is represented by the meme that has replaced Twitter's logo, shot up 20% on Monday. It remains to be seen how this move will impact the platform and its users in the long run.
 
I think Musk's decision to target the NY Times was a total misfire 🤦‍♂️. I mean, what's next? Purgin' all the journalists who don't get paid in crypto? It's just gonna open up a whole can of worms about fake accounts and bots 😬. And now it's all about payin' for blue checks? That's just a money grab 🤑. I get that Musk wants to shake things up, but this is just gonna confuse everyone and potentially ruin the whole Twitter experience 😕.
 
I gotta ask, what's next? Elon Musk going to start charging us for breathing? I mean, if paying for verification is the new norm, then why not start a subscription service for liking tweets too? "Hey, you wanna like this tweet? That'll be $10, please!" 🤣👀 Anyway, it's kinda funny that he's trying to monetize blue check marks. Guess that's one way to make Twitter more... doge-friendly 🐶💸
 
I'm so confused about this whole thing 🤔👀... Elon Musk is all over the place with these changes. One minute he's saying everyone gets treated equally, the next he's trying to sell blue check marks like a premium product 💸. And now he's leaving legacy verified accounts alone? It doesn't add up. I'm not sure what his end game is here, but it feels like more marketing hype than actual policy change 📢.

And let's be real, the fact that only the NY Times lost its blue check mark while other verified accounts got a fancy label is just shady 💯. What's next? Paying for engagement or something? 🤷‍♂️ This whole thing feels like a PR stunt to me, and I'm not buying it 😒.

I do hope this doesn't lead to more bots and scams on the platform... that would be a real misfire 🚫. And what about all those users who paid for verification just because they wanted to look legit? 🤑 That's just crazy talk.

Anyway, I'll be keeping an eye on this situation... but for now, I'm just rolling my eyes 😒.
 
I think Elon Musk's decision to purge blue check marks is a total mess 🤦‍♂️! First of all, he didn't even follow through with his own plan and left most legacy verified accounts intact, just adding this weird label that makes it super confusing. I mean, who wants to deal with all these variables when verifying someone's account? It just opens up more room for scammers and bots to wreak havoc.

And let's be real, Musk's motive is totally clear - he wants to cash in on the verified check mark feature and make some extra cash 💸. Newsflash, Elon: forcing people to pay for verification just won't cut it. It's like putting a price tag on credibility or something 🤑. And what about all the users who actually deserve that blue check mark? The ones who have been working hard to earn their reputation?

I'm not sure how this is going to end, but I'm pretty sure it'll be a disaster 💥. Twitter's losing its credibility by the minute, and Musk needs to get his act together before it's too late 🕰️.
 
omg what a mess 🤯 i think elon musk needs to rethink his strategy here like totally clearify the new label system ASAP so ppl know whats up with verification...and maybe reconsider not using it for paid subscribers lol...i mean idc about the blue check mark but if its gonna be used as a revenue stream then let's do it right 🤑...but on the other hand i get why he'd wanna shake things up and make Twitter Blue more appealing to people...still think hes making it harder 4 ppl to find legit info online tho 🤦‍♂️
 
OMG, what is Elon doing?! 🤯 I mean, I get it, he wants to make some cash from verified accounts but like, come on! The NY Times was never gonna pay for verification anyway 😂 And now they're stuck with this weird label that's just confusing everyone? 🙄 It feels like he's more interested in stirring up drama than actually making Twitter a better platform. I mean, isn't the point of having blue check marks to trust the accounts and know they're legit? 🤷‍♀️ And now it's like anyone can get a label for like, 8 bucks a month 🤑...idk man, this whole thing feels super sketchy to me 🤔.
 
I'm not sure about this new label thingy 🤔... it feels like a big mess to me 😅. I mean, who's supposed to trust the label now? Is it just some scammer gonna pay for Twitter Blue and get a fancy label too? 🤑... and what about all the legit users who are gonna be confused by this change? 🤷‍♀️... and btw, why is Elon Musk being so salty towards The New York Times? 😒... can't he just have a chill conversation with them instead of all these tweets? 📱
 
I'm so confused about what's going on with Elon Musk and Twitter 🤯📊 I mean, you gotta wonder why he chose to go after the New York Times like that? They're not even paying for that verification anyway 🤑 It just feels like another example of how Musk is making decisions based on his own ego rather than trying to make sense for the platform as a whole 💡 And what's up with this new label thingy? It's all unclear and kinda shady 🤔 It could actually be a problem if people start using it to scam or impersonate others, you know? 🚨
 
🤔 So I'm thinkin' Musk's move is a total mess 🚮. First off, it's super unclear what's goin' on with all these new labels 📝. I mean, if you're not payin' for Twitter Blue, why are your verification marks still stickin' around? 🤷‍♂️ It just makes me think that Musk is playin' games and tryin' to make a buck 💸.

And what's up with the whole New York Times thing? 😒 I don't get why they had to take it off if you're not gonna pay for verification. And now the Times is all like "we're outta here" 🚫, which is kinda rich comin' from a guy who's just tryin' to make money off Twitter Blue 💸.

I'm worried that this move is goin' to open up the floodgates for scammers and bots 🤖. I mean, if you can just pay for a verification label, what's stoppin' people from makin' fake accounts lookin' like they're verified? 🤔 It's like Musk is basically sayin' "come on in, the water's fine" 🏊‍♂️.

I dunno, maybe I'm just too cynical 🤷‍♂️. But this whole thing just feels like a big ol' mess 🤯.
 
I'm so confused about Elon Musk's latest move on Twitter 🤯. I mean, I get it, he wants to make some cash from the blue check marks, but singling out one account like that? It just doesn't seem right 💸. And what's up with the new label that's just appended to legacy verified accounts? It's all so unclear 🤔. I'm worried it'll just lead to more scammers and bots causing trouble on the platform 🚫. Can we please just have a straightforward verification system that doesn't involve revenue considerations? 💸 Just don't get me started on how this is going to affect the trust users have in the platform... 😬
 
Back
Top