Federal Judge Throws Out Trump Order Blocking Wind Energy Development, Ruling it "Arbitrary and Capricious"
A US federal judge has struck down President Donald Trump's executive order blocking wind energy projects, deeming the effort to halt virtually all leasing of wind farms on federal lands and waters as "arbitrarily and capricious" and in violation of US law. The ruling came after a coalition of 17 states and Washington D.C., led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, challenged Trump's executive order.
The court ruling comes as part of a larger battle over renewable energy, with Trump having been hostile to wind energy, particularly offshore wind, and prioritizing fossil fuels to produce electricity. Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell hailed the decision as a victory for green jobs and renewable energy, stating that it preserves "hundreds of millions of dollars" in investments into offshore wind.
The coalition argued that Trump lacked the authority to halt project permitting, and that doing so would jeopardize state economies, energy mix, public health, and climate goals. The government countered that the states' claims were outside the federal court's jurisdiction and represented a policy disagreement over energy development preferences.
Wind energy is the US's largest source of renewable energy, providing about 10% of electricity generated in the nation. The coalition includes major states such as Arizona, California, Colorado, and New York, which have significant investments in wind energy projects.
The ruling has been welcomed by environmental groups, including the Alliance for Clean Energy New York and the Natural Resources Defense Council, who praised it as a victory for consumers, union workers, US businesses, clean air, and the climate.
A US federal judge has struck down President Donald Trump's executive order blocking wind energy projects, deeming the effort to halt virtually all leasing of wind farms on federal lands and waters as "arbitrarily and capricious" and in violation of US law. The ruling came after a coalition of 17 states and Washington D.C., led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, challenged Trump's executive order.
The court ruling comes as part of a larger battle over renewable energy, with Trump having been hostile to wind energy, particularly offshore wind, and prioritizing fossil fuels to produce electricity. Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell hailed the decision as a victory for green jobs and renewable energy, stating that it preserves "hundreds of millions of dollars" in investments into offshore wind.
The coalition argued that Trump lacked the authority to halt project permitting, and that doing so would jeopardize state economies, energy mix, public health, and climate goals. The government countered that the states' claims were outside the federal court's jurisdiction and represented a policy disagreement over energy development preferences.
Wind energy is the US's largest source of renewable energy, providing about 10% of electricity generated in the nation. The coalition includes major states such as Arizona, California, Colorado, and New York, which have significant investments in wind energy projects.
The ruling has been welcomed by environmental groups, including the Alliance for Clean Energy New York and the Natural Resources Defense Council, who praised it as a victory for consumers, union workers, US businesses, clean air, and the climate.