Max Rushden's take on the chaotic Champions League group stage concludes that the format has led to an information overload, with 18 games broadcast simultaneously. The writer finds it difficult to process the sheer amount of football being played, making it challenging to appreciate any one game without feeling overwhelmed.
Rushden believes that the current format is a far cry from the original intention of the Champions League, which was not designed to be consumed like a never-ending content machine. He longs for the simplicity of watching one or two games at a time and focusing on the big moments that truly matter in football.
Despite the overwhelming nature of the broadcast schedule, Rushden acknowledges that it can still be entertaining. However, he questions whether this format is good for the players, who are being flogged into exhaustion playing multiple matches in a short span. Teams and fans celebrating because they don't have to play more games feels counterintuitive to him.
Rushden notes two important points from Nicky Bandini's analysis: Firstly, there is less jeopardy in the Premier League compared to lower-league teams like Sporting or Benfica, which face much higher stakes due to their limited resources. Secondly, Rushden wonders if this format will become an annual event, a "bun-fight free-for-all" where viewers can simply lean into the sheer amount of football being played.
In contrast, watching a more traditional match between Cambridge United and Shrewsbury felt like a different game altogether β one that was more attritional, boring, but easier to follow. Ultimately, Rushden's take on the Champions League format is a call for viewers to be mindful of how they consume this type of content and appreciate the value of simplicity in football.
Rushden believes that the current format is a far cry from the original intention of the Champions League, which was not designed to be consumed like a never-ending content machine. He longs for the simplicity of watching one or two games at a time and focusing on the big moments that truly matter in football.
Despite the overwhelming nature of the broadcast schedule, Rushden acknowledges that it can still be entertaining. However, he questions whether this format is good for the players, who are being flogged into exhaustion playing multiple matches in a short span. Teams and fans celebrating because they don't have to play more games feels counterintuitive to him.
Rushden notes two important points from Nicky Bandini's analysis: Firstly, there is less jeopardy in the Premier League compared to lower-league teams like Sporting or Benfica, which face much higher stakes due to their limited resources. Secondly, Rushden wonders if this format will become an annual event, a "bun-fight free-for-all" where viewers can simply lean into the sheer amount of football being played.
In contrast, watching a more traditional match between Cambridge United and Shrewsbury felt like a different game altogether β one that was more attritional, boring, but easier to follow. Ultimately, Rushden's take on the Champions League format is a call for viewers to be mindful of how they consume this type of content and appreciate the value of simplicity in football.