Major bottled water brands are not as pristine as they seem. A recent study published in Science Direct has found dozens of unregulated and harmful chemicals in popular brands, challenging the notion that bottled water is a safer alternative to tap water.
Researchers tested 64 regulated and unregulated disinfection by-products (DBPs) in 10 well-known brands and discovered that all of them contained DBPs. However, it's worth noting that these levels are generally lower than those found in tap water.
The study's findings have sparked concern among experts, who argue that the risks associated with DBPs should not be taken lightly. "Many human epidemiologic studies show a risk of bladder cancer; some show a risk of colorectal cancer, and some show a risk of miscarriage and birth defects," said Susan Richardson, one of the study's authors.
The types of DBPs found in bottled water are particularly concerning, including brominated compounds that have been linked to cancer. However, it's worth noting that levels of these chemicals were relatively low, similar to those found in tap water.
So why do some bottled water brands contain more DBPs than others? Richardson explained that many brands use tap water that has been further purified, but not all the DBPs are removed during this process. Additionally, some bottled waters are treated with ozone, which can also form DBPs.
The study's findings have significant implications for public health. "Unregulated DBPs are of greatest concern because of their toxicological profile," said Natalie Exum, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "However, we may be consuming them without proper understanding of their harm to our health."
Exum argues that regulation is needed to address these concerns. "We need to expand regulation for DBPs of greatest concern to health in public drinking water," she said.
While the study's findings are concerning, they also highlight the importance of proper testing and regulation. Vasilis Vasiliou, a professor at Yale School of Public Health, noted that finding haloacetic acids and chloroform in UV-treated waters suggests cross-contamination or incomplete processing.
Ultimately, neither bottled water nor tap water is universally safer. Both options have their own set of risks and concerns. Richardson emphasized the importance of switching to tap water unless there's a major contamination issue with the local water supply.
The study's findings serve as a reminder that even seemingly healthy choices can come with hidden risks. As one expert noted, "the cost is so much higher to buy bottled water."
Researchers tested 64 regulated and unregulated disinfection by-products (DBPs) in 10 well-known brands and discovered that all of them contained DBPs. However, it's worth noting that these levels are generally lower than those found in tap water.
The study's findings have sparked concern among experts, who argue that the risks associated with DBPs should not be taken lightly. "Many human epidemiologic studies show a risk of bladder cancer; some show a risk of colorectal cancer, and some show a risk of miscarriage and birth defects," said Susan Richardson, one of the study's authors.
The types of DBPs found in bottled water are particularly concerning, including brominated compounds that have been linked to cancer. However, it's worth noting that levels of these chemicals were relatively low, similar to those found in tap water.
So why do some bottled water brands contain more DBPs than others? Richardson explained that many brands use tap water that has been further purified, but not all the DBPs are removed during this process. Additionally, some bottled waters are treated with ozone, which can also form DBPs.
The study's findings have significant implications for public health. "Unregulated DBPs are of greatest concern because of their toxicological profile," said Natalie Exum, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "However, we may be consuming them without proper understanding of their harm to our health."
Exum argues that regulation is needed to address these concerns. "We need to expand regulation for DBPs of greatest concern to health in public drinking water," she said.
While the study's findings are concerning, they also highlight the importance of proper testing and regulation. Vasilis Vasiliou, a professor at Yale School of Public Health, noted that finding haloacetic acids and chloroform in UV-treated waters suggests cross-contamination or incomplete processing.
Ultimately, neither bottled water nor tap water is universally safer. Both options have their own set of risks and concerns. Richardson emphasized the importance of switching to tap water unless there's a major contamination issue with the local water supply.
The study's findings serve as a reminder that even seemingly healthy choices can come with hidden risks. As one expert noted, "the cost is so much higher to buy bottled water."
. I thought bottled water was supposed to be the safer option, but it seems like those big brands are still contaminating our water 
. I mean, a bladder cancer risk from drinking your water? No thank you! 
And it's not just that - some of these chemicals have been linked to birth defects and miscarriage too... it's just not worth the risk. I'm going to stick with tap water unless there's a major contamination issue in my area 
. At least then I know what I'm getting 
. It's crazy that we need more regulation on this stuff, but maybe that's exactly what we need to make sure our drinking water is safe to drink 
.
. I mean, who wants to believe that something as clean and pure as bottled water could be contaminated with all sorts of nasty chemicals? It just doesn't sit right with me 
.
. I mean, what's the harm in stickin' to tap water, ya know? It's like they say - "you can't put a price on your health" 
.
. And you know what? We're still alive and kickin' today! 
. It's high time someone took a closer look at what's goin' on in them bottles and made sure it's safe for us to drink 
. But now that I know the truth, I might just stick to tap water from now on 
. But seriously, the levels might not be as high as tap water, but still, shouldn't we be worried about these DBPs? They're like little ticking time bombs in our bottles 
.
. Like, how many people actually know that their bottled water has been linked to cancer? It's not just tap water anymore, it's bottled water too 
. And yeah, regulation is definitely needed, but we also need more transparency from the brands about what's going on in their waters 
. Maybe it's time for us to rethink our choices and start prioritizing tap water instead... or at least making sure we're getting the best quality from our brands 
The notion that bottled water is a safer alternative to tap water just got a major shake-up 
. I mean, who do you trust? The company that's making a killing off your every purchase 
. Bottled water, on the other hand, is basically just a gamble with your health 
. So yeah, I'm sticking to tap from now on 
. It's crazy that these chemicals are even present in the first place! 
. Bottled water companies have been touting their products as safer alternatives, but this study puts a major dent in that narrative 
. We should be focusing on making sure our tap water is clean and safe to drink, not relying on bottled water as an alternative 
. The fact that it costs so much more to buy bottled water should be a major concern – what's the point of paying extra for something that might still have hidden risks? 
I mean, who knew that these supposed healthy drinks could be contaminated with all sorts of nasty chemicals? It's like they say in the movie 'The Matrix', "You take the blue pill, you wake up in the real world. But if you take the red pill, you'll see things as they really are." In this case, the red pill is that bottled water isn't as safe as we think! 
. I mean, who really thinks about what's in their water bottle? 
.
.