I'm really worried about Judge Stallings' credibility here... a trip with Fern Smith back in 1997 is one thing, but the fact that she ruled against Tremane Wood just months before taking that vacation with Smith makes me wonder if her impartiality has been compromised at all. It's like she's got a history of making rulings that benefit prosecutors over defendants . And now, with the AG deciding to retry Glossip despite shaky evidence... it feels like we're witnessing a systemic problem here rather than just one bad judge . What's next? Will they bring in another prosecutor from Stallings' old crew to 'help' with the case?
I'm really worried about Oklahoma's justice system right now... like, how can we trust Judge Stallings to make fair decisions when she's got so many ties to the DA's office? It seems fishy that she just happens to have a vacation trip buddy in Fern Smith, someone who basically sealed Glossip's fate. And with Prater involved too... it's like they're all playing some kind of twisted game behind our backs. The fact that the AG is retrying Glossip despite a lack of solid evidence makes me think there's something more going on here. We need to keep an eye on this and make sure justice isn't just another word for "politics"
I'm totally freaking out over this ! The more I read about Judge Stallings' trip with Fern Smith, the more I'm like "wait a minute" . How can she be fair to Richard Glossip when she has a personal connection with someone who was involved in his original conviction? It's like, hello impartiality crisis! I don't know what to believe anymore about this trial. The whole thing just seems so fishy . And now that Oklahoma AG is retrying Glossip without solid evidence, it's like the system is rigged . Defense lawyers are right, if Stallings can't be impartial in one case, how can she be fair in Glossip's? I just want some answers!
I'm not sure what's more concerning, the fact that Judge Stallings took a trip with Fern Smith back in 1997 or that she's now presiding over Richard Glossip's third trial without being transparent about it earlier . It's one thing to have connections with colleagues, but another to take trips together and then pretend like nothing happened.
We all know how important impartiality is in the courtroom, especially in high-profile cases. I'm starting to think that the state of Oklahoma needs a bit more transparency when it comes to their judges' personal lives and relationships . It's not just about Stallings, it's about the integrity of the justice system as a whole .
I'm also wondering if we'll ever know for sure what really went down in that 1997 trip or whether Stallings was indeed biased against Tremane Wood because of her friendship with Smith . Either way, it's time for some accountability and maybe even an independent investigation into Stallings' impartiality .
I'm really worried about Judge Stallings' credibility here... a trip with Fern Smith back in 1997 is one thing, but the fact that she ruled against Tremane Wood just months before taking that vacation with Smith makes me wonder if her impartiality has been compromised at all. It's like she's got a history of making rulings that benefit prosecutors over defendants 
. And now, with the AG deciding to retry Glossip despite shaky evidence... it feels like we're witnessing a systemic problem here rather than just one bad judge 
. What's next? Will they bring in another prosecutor from Stallings' old crew to 'help' with the case? 
It seems fishy that she just happens to have a vacation trip buddy in Fern Smith, someone who basically sealed Glossip's fate. And with Prater involved too... it's like they're all playing some kind of twisted game behind our backs. 
! The more I read about Judge Stallings' trip with Fern Smith, the more I'm like "wait a minute" 
. How can she be fair to Richard Glossip when she has a personal connection with someone who was involved in his original conviction? It's like, hello impartiality crisis! 
I don't know what to believe anymore about this trial. The whole thing just seems so fishy 
. And now that Oklahoma AG is retrying Glossip without solid evidence, it's like the system is rigged 
. Defense lawyers are right, if Stallings can't be impartial in one case, how can she be fair in Glossip's? I just want some answers! 
. It's one thing to have connections with colleagues, but another to take trips together and then pretend like nothing happened. 
. It's not just about Stallings, it's about the integrity of the justice system as a whole 
.
. Either way, it's time for some accountability and maybe even an independent investigation into Stallings' impartiality