Launching an AI Startup: The Hardest Part Isn't the Tech, It's Turning Magic into Reality.
When it comes to building a successful AI startup, entrepreneurs often focus on the technical aspects of their product. They pour over lines of code, tweak algorithms, and optimize models to create a cutting-edge application that showcases the power of artificial intelligence. However, as Julie Bornstein, CEO of Daydream, discovered firsthand, the real challenge lies in translating that magic into something people actually find useful.
Bornstein's original idea for Daydream was simple: use AI to match customers with the perfect garments, which they'd be delighted to pay for. But signing up over 265 partners, with access to more than 2 million products, proved to be an easy feat. Fulfilling even a simple request like "I need a dress for a wedding in Paris" was a different story altogether.
"It's incredibly complex," says Bornstein. "Are you the bride, the mother-in-law, or a guest? What season is it? How formal a wedding? What statement do you want to make?" The lack of consistency and reliability of AI models meant that sometimes the model would drop one or two elements of the query, leading to unexpected results.
To overcome this challenge, Daydream had to overhaul its technical team. Bornstein hires Maria Belousova, former CTO of Grubhub, who brought in a team of top engineers to tackle the problem. The secret to their success lies in the fascinating problem they're trying to solve: fashion. "Fashion is such a juicy space because it has taste and personalization and visual data," says Belousova.
But Daydream's journey isn't unique. Other AI startups, like Duckbill, have faced similar challenges. CEO Meghan Joyce notes that her team encountered the same issues with overconfident models trying to fake their abilities. "We started looking around, like, was a phone call made? Who's Nancy?" says Joyce, recalling an experiment where the model claimed to have made a call and set up an appointment.
These experiences serve as cautionary tales for AI startups with overly optimistic timelines. Instead of predicting a revolutionary year in productivity, experts now believe that 2026 or 2027 may be the year when AI finally turns the corner and makes the world dramatically more productive.
In the meantime, entrepreneurs like Bornstein and Joyce are persevering, fueled by their passion for solving complex problems and creating something truly useful. As they navigate the challenges of building an AI startup, one thing is clear: it's not just about the tech – it's about turning magic into reality.
When it comes to building a successful AI startup, entrepreneurs often focus on the technical aspects of their product. They pour over lines of code, tweak algorithms, and optimize models to create a cutting-edge application that showcases the power of artificial intelligence. However, as Julie Bornstein, CEO of Daydream, discovered firsthand, the real challenge lies in translating that magic into something people actually find useful.
Bornstein's original idea for Daydream was simple: use AI to match customers with the perfect garments, which they'd be delighted to pay for. But signing up over 265 partners, with access to more than 2 million products, proved to be an easy feat. Fulfilling even a simple request like "I need a dress for a wedding in Paris" was a different story altogether.
"It's incredibly complex," says Bornstein. "Are you the bride, the mother-in-law, or a guest? What season is it? How formal a wedding? What statement do you want to make?" The lack of consistency and reliability of AI models meant that sometimes the model would drop one or two elements of the query, leading to unexpected results.
To overcome this challenge, Daydream had to overhaul its technical team. Bornstein hires Maria Belousova, former CTO of Grubhub, who brought in a team of top engineers to tackle the problem. The secret to their success lies in the fascinating problem they're trying to solve: fashion. "Fashion is such a juicy space because it has taste and personalization and visual data," says Belousova.
But Daydream's journey isn't unique. Other AI startups, like Duckbill, have faced similar challenges. CEO Meghan Joyce notes that her team encountered the same issues with overconfident models trying to fake their abilities. "We started looking around, like, was a phone call made? Who's Nancy?" says Joyce, recalling an experiment where the model claimed to have made a call and set up an appointment.
These experiences serve as cautionary tales for AI startups with overly optimistic timelines. Instead of predicting a revolutionary year in productivity, experts now believe that 2026 or 2027 may be the year when AI finally turns the corner and makes the world dramatically more productive.
In the meantime, entrepreneurs like Bornstein and Joyce are persevering, fueled by their passion for solving complex problems and creating something truly useful. As they navigate the challenges of building an AI startup, one thing is clear: it's not just about the tech – it's about turning magic into reality.
. I mean, sure, Daydream's founders were excited about their idea, but did they really consider how hard it'd be to actually make it work? Like, what's the point of having a team of top engineers if you can't even get the basics right? 
And don't even get me started on these "experts" saying AI is finally gonna turn the corner by 2027... 
We've been hearing that for years now. Where's the proof? What actual data are they basing their claims on? I need to see some solid numbers and sources before I start believing all this hype 
. I mean, I've seen those fancy AI demos where everything seems so seamless and perfect, but when you try to apply that in real life... 
It's like trying to recreate a work of art by just throwing paint at the canvas and hoping it turns out right 
.
. We get so caught up in the tech stuff, but we forget that there are people on the other end, with their own stories, experiences, and needs. It's not just about throwing code at a problem, it's about understanding the nuances of human behavior 
.
. I mean, have you ever tried to get a dress for a wedding in Paris? There are so many variables - what season, how formal, who's the bride... it's like trying to solve a puzzle blindfolded 
.
. It's not going to be easy, but I think they're onto something when they say that AI is all about turning magic into reality 
.
It's like they're trying to solve world hunger or something. And don't even get me started on how inconsistent AI models are 
like, no wonder people get confused when their personalized fashion recommendations aren't quite right.
.
and sometimes u gotta take a step back and think what even is the goal? how can we make it relatable and useful for ppl? not just some fancy tech that nobody understands 
fashion is such a great example btw, cuz its all about style and personalization 
. I mean, who hasn't had an experience where they asked Siri or Alexa for something and she just doesn't get it 
. It's about understanding the human side of things and making sure your AI model is actually thinking like us 
.
.
. Building an app that just provides decent outfit suggestions isn't gonna change the world 
. We need to make sure its not just about "magic" but about solving real problems and creating something truly useful 
. But 2026 or 2027 being the year of productivity breakthroughs? That sounds like a nice pipe dream... until they figure out that puzzle 
But at the same time, I think we need to be realistic about timelines and expectations 
2026 might not be the year when ai turns a corner but im sure its gonna get there eventually