Hochul's Plan Sparks Concern Over Treatment of Homeless in NYC Subways
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced plans to expand a state-run program called SCOUT, which sends teams of behavioral nurses and police officers into subway stations to force homeless people into hospital care after a nurse determines they're at risk of harming themselves or others. The goal is to provide immediate care and support, but critics argue that the approach may not be effective in addressing homelessness unless individuals have access to permanent housing.
Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has proposed a softer approach, replacing police officers with "transit ambassadors" who offer assistance with emergencies, directions, accessibility, and other transit information. He also plans to establish a Department of Community Safety that would deploy mental health workers to some emergency calls instead of the NYPD.
The contrast between Hochul's plan and Mamdani's proposal highlights the differing views on how to address homelessness in New York City's subways. Critics argue that forcing people into care without addressing the underlying issue of lack of housing can lead to a revolving door between hospitals, shelters, jails, and the streets.
Proponents of SCOUT, like Brian Stettin, the creator of the PATH program, claim that the approach has helped 7,500 mentally ill homeless individuals receive inpatient hospital care. However, others have raised concerns about the use of police force to remove people from subway stations, citing instances where individuals were handcuffed and subjected to "spit hoods" before being taken to hospitals.
Hochul's plan has been met with skepticism by some, including Dave Giffen, Executive Director of the Coalition for the Homeless. "Simply increasing the number of SCOUT teams won't have any actual effect because the underlying problem of individuals having no homes remains unaddressed and ignored," he said.
As Mamdani considers his own approach to addressing homelessness in the subways, questions remain about whether his vision can effectively address the complex issue at hand.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced plans to expand a state-run program called SCOUT, which sends teams of behavioral nurses and police officers into subway stations to force homeless people into hospital care after a nurse determines they're at risk of harming themselves or others. The goal is to provide immediate care and support, but critics argue that the approach may not be effective in addressing homelessness unless individuals have access to permanent housing.
Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has proposed a softer approach, replacing police officers with "transit ambassadors" who offer assistance with emergencies, directions, accessibility, and other transit information. He also plans to establish a Department of Community Safety that would deploy mental health workers to some emergency calls instead of the NYPD.
The contrast between Hochul's plan and Mamdani's proposal highlights the differing views on how to address homelessness in New York City's subways. Critics argue that forcing people into care without addressing the underlying issue of lack of housing can lead to a revolving door between hospitals, shelters, jails, and the streets.
Proponents of SCOUT, like Brian Stettin, the creator of the PATH program, claim that the approach has helped 7,500 mentally ill homeless individuals receive inpatient hospital care. However, others have raised concerns about the use of police force to remove people from subway stations, citing instances where individuals were handcuffed and subjected to "spit hoods" before being taken to hospitals.
Hochul's plan has been met with skepticism by some, including Dave Giffen, Executive Director of the Coalition for the Homeless. "Simply increasing the number of SCOUT teams won't have any actual effect because the underlying problem of individuals having no homes remains unaddressed and ignored," he said.
As Mamdani considers his own approach to addressing homelessness in the subways, questions remain about whether his vision can effectively address the complex issue at hand.