For me, the switch to eSIM was supposed to be a seamless one. I had long used mobile phones with removable SIM cards, and never once encountered any issues. But now, as I'm stuck with an eSIM, I've come to regret my decision.
The journey to eSIM began years ago, when device makers started slimming down their phones. The nanoSIM era marked a significant milestone in this process, allowing for more compact designs. And so, the eSIM standard was introduced, promising greater convenience and flexibility. But as it turns out, that's exactly what I've come to realize.
With an eSIM, you can store multiple SIMs and swap between them using software – but there's no physical card to swipe. This might seem like a minor concession at first, but trust me when I say it makes all the difference. Swapping SIM cards used to take just seconds, but now that's a process fraught with frustration.
I've needed to move my eSIM only occasionally since switching to this new technology, and each time has been a nightmare. Android's built-in tools aren't as reliable as they once were, and even then, carriers bear the brunt of fixing these issues. I recently found myself logged into the mobile app for my carrier – T-Mobile – but still unable to get an eSIM working.
In this situation, support agents were needed, and that meant a tedious round of back-and-forth on the phone. And when I wasn't logged in to the app, things became even more complicated. The process became so convoluted that it required me to visit a physical store – a situation that would have taken only 30 seconds with a removable SIM.
Perhaps most concerning is what happens if your eSIM fails: losing access to your phone number can leave you locked out of not just your phone, but also your digital life. This risk is too great for many people, who have relied on their phone numbers as a means of authentication – and banks, messaging apps, crypto exchanges, and carriers all rely on SMS multifactor codes.
In short, the convenience offered by eSIM comes at a steep price: security and reliability that's hard to come by. We've lost the headphone jack, but we've gained this technology – a trade-off I'm not sure is worth it.
The journey to eSIM began years ago, when device makers started slimming down their phones. The nanoSIM era marked a significant milestone in this process, allowing for more compact designs. And so, the eSIM standard was introduced, promising greater convenience and flexibility. But as it turns out, that's exactly what I've come to realize.
With an eSIM, you can store multiple SIMs and swap between them using software – but there's no physical card to swipe. This might seem like a minor concession at first, but trust me when I say it makes all the difference. Swapping SIM cards used to take just seconds, but now that's a process fraught with frustration.
I've needed to move my eSIM only occasionally since switching to this new technology, and each time has been a nightmare. Android's built-in tools aren't as reliable as they once were, and even then, carriers bear the brunt of fixing these issues. I recently found myself logged into the mobile app for my carrier – T-Mobile – but still unable to get an eSIM working.
In this situation, support agents were needed, and that meant a tedious round of back-and-forth on the phone. And when I wasn't logged in to the app, things became even more complicated. The process became so convoluted that it required me to visit a physical store – a situation that would have taken only 30 seconds with a removable SIM.
Perhaps most concerning is what happens if your eSIM fails: losing access to your phone number can leave you locked out of not just your phone, but also your digital life. This risk is too great for many people, who have relied on their phone numbers as a means of authentication – and banks, messaging apps, crypto exchanges, and carriers all rely on SMS multifactor codes.
In short, the convenience offered by eSIM comes at a steep price: security and reliability that's hard to come by. We've lost the headphone jack, but we've gained this technology – a trade-off I'm not sure is worth it.