Trump's War on Offshore Wind Power Takes a Hit in Federal Courts
A recent slew of rulings by federal judges has dealt a significant blow to Donald Trump's administration's attempts to halt construction on four major offshore wind mega-projects along the east coast. The projects, which are expected to generate nearly five gigawatts of energy - enough to power 3.5 million homes - have been deemed critical for meeting America's energy affordability crisis.
In December, the Trump administration issued a stop-work order citing "reasons of national security," but judges across different jurisdictions have rejected these claims, paving the way for construction to resume on Vineyard Wind, Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, Empire Wind 1 and Revolution Wind. A fifth project, Sunrise Wind, is also fighting its own stop-work order, with a court hearing scheduled for Monday that industry experts predict will yield a positive outcome.
Critics of the Trump administration's stance on offshore wind argue that it was a pretext to undermine the development of clean energy sources. "This is a broad rejection of the administration's arguments," said John Carlson, senior north-east regional policy manager for the climate non-profit Clean Air Task Force. "All these projects already went through very significant national security reviews."
The impact of Trump's actions on offshore wind has been severe, with the industry experiencing a nosedive in new project approvals due to slashed tax credits from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. BloombergNEF now predicts only 6.1 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2035 - a far cry from pre-election projections of 39 gigawatts.
While some see Trump's war on offshore wind as a temporary setback, others believe it will have long-term consequences for the industry. "This is not the end of what has been an absolute war on wind from the Trump administration," said Kris Ohleth, director of the Special Initiative on Offshore Wind. "We're happy to have the win in court, but in the broader context, we are a very challenged industry right now."
Despite the challenges posed by the Trump administration's actions, experts are already looking forward to 2029, when they hope that a new administration will take a more favorable stance on offshore wind. In the meantime, the industry is turning to friendly states and working with them on transmission reforms, procurement reform, permitting updates, ports and vessel strategy.
While Trump may have lost this battle in court, he has succeeded in creating risk and uncertainty for the industry - a prospect that Carlson sees as a temporary hurdle rather than an insurmountable obstacle. "But I don't think that means he's necessarily winning," he said. "That just means we need to be very thoughtful and innovative in how we move forward."
A recent slew of rulings by federal judges has dealt a significant blow to Donald Trump's administration's attempts to halt construction on four major offshore wind mega-projects along the east coast. The projects, which are expected to generate nearly five gigawatts of energy - enough to power 3.5 million homes - have been deemed critical for meeting America's energy affordability crisis.
In December, the Trump administration issued a stop-work order citing "reasons of national security," but judges across different jurisdictions have rejected these claims, paving the way for construction to resume on Vineyard Wind, Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, Empire Wind 1 and Revolution Wind. A fifth project, Sunrise Wind, is also fighting its own stop-work order, with a court hearing scheduled for Monday that industry experts predict will yield a positive outcome.
Critics of the Trump administration's stance on offshore wind argue that it was a pretext to undermine the development of clean energy sources. "This is a broad rejection of the administration's arguments," said John Carlson, senior north-east regional policy manager for the climate non-profit Clean Air Task Force. "All these projects already went through very significant national security reviews."
The impact of Trump's actions on offshore wind has been severe, with the industry experiencing a nosedive in new project approvals due to slashed tax credits from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. BloombergNEF now predicts only 6.1 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2035 - a far cry from pre-election projections of 39 gigawatts.
While some see Trump's war on offshore wind as a temporary setback, others believe it will have long-term consequences for the industry. "This is not the end of what has been an absolute war on wind from the Trump administration," said Kris Ohleth, director of the Special Initiative on Offshore Wind. "We're happy to have the win in court, but in the broader context, we are a very challenged industry right now."
Despite the challenges posed by the Trump administration's actions, experts are already looking forward to 2029, when they hope that a new administration will take a more favorable stance on offshore wind. In the meantime, the industry is turning to friendly states and working with them on transmission reforms, procurement reform, permitting updates, ports and vessel strategy.
While Trump may have lost this battle in court, he has succeeded in creating risk and uncertainty for the industry - a prospect that Carlson sees as a temporary hurdle rather than an insurmountable obstacle. "But I don't think that means he's necessarily winning," he said. "That just means we need to be very thoughtful and innovative in how we move forward."