ITV heads to New York for World Cup coverage while BBC stays in Salford

BBC to stay put in Salford as ITV takes World Cup coverage to New York, securing prized studio with Manhattan skyline view.

The BBC has opted to maintain a base in the UK for its World Cup coverage this summer, prioritizing cost and environmental considerations over a costly move abroad. The corporation's decision is largely driven by the significant increase in costs associated with staging the tournament in multiple countries, as well as Fifa's choice of host nations.

In contrast, ITV has taken a bold step to secure an early advantage in the ratings battle ahead, opting to stage its entire World Cup coverage from a studio in Brooklyn, New York. This move comes with the added benefit of filming travelogues and mini documentaries to support live broadcasts, providing ITV with an opportunity to showcase its global reach.

The BBC's decision is also influenced by its commitment to reducing carbon emissions, which has led it to prioritize minimizing air travel for its coverage team. While this approach may limit their international exposure, it underscores the corporation's focus on sustainability in a bid to reduce its environmental footprint.

ITV's plans, on the other hand, will see Gary Neville, Roy Keane, and Ian Wright serve as pundits, providing expert analysis from the United States. The trio will be joined by Mark Pougatch and Laura Woods, who will present ITV's World Cup coverage from their New York studio.

The scheduling of matches between the two broadcasters is also set to reflect their different approaches. ITV has secured 51 matches for its coverage, including England's opening game against Croatia, while the BBC has secured 54 matches, with England's group stage fixtures and semi-finals included in its schedule.

Despite ITV's efforts to gain an early advantage in the ratings battle, historical data suggests that the BBC remains a formidable opponent. The corporation achieved peak audiences of over 15 million for the 2022 World Cup final, compared to ITV's 4.3 million.

However, ITV has enjoyed significant viewing figures for football when it is its sole broadcaster, with England's Women's Euro 2025 semi-final win against Italy attracting a peak audience of 10.2 million last summer.
 
omg u think ITV makes a huge mistake by movin to NYC ๐Ÿคฏ but at the same time, its kinda cool that they're gonna have a sick studio with a view of the manhattan skyline lol idk about the bbc tho, cant they just make it more cost effective somehow? i mean, 54 matches is a lotta content. and what's up with fifa choosin host nations anyway? ๐Ÿค” anywayz, its gonna be an interesting world cup this year! ๐Ÿ˜Ž
 
I think ITV making the move to New York for the World Cup coverage is gonna be pretty sweet ๐Ÿคฉ. I mean, can you imagine watching the footy with Gary Neville and Roy Keane as pundits? ๐Ÿ˜Ž But at the same time, I gotta respect the BBC's decision to keep it in Salford. Those environmental considerations are really important these days, and it shows they're not just worried about their ratings ๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ’š. ITV might try to gain an edge with their US studio, but let's be real, the BBC has got some serious credentials under its belt ๐Ÿ˜Š. And who knows, maybe this move will inspire more UK broadcasters to prioritize sustainability in their coverage... a visual representation of that could be: ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ’š๐ŸŒŽ
 
[Image of a soccer ball going into a goal, with the words "Itv's got game" written above it ๐Ÿ˜‚]

[ GIF of Gary Neville and Roy Keane looking at each other, with one eyebrow raised ๐Ÿค”]

[ Image of a map with New York City in the center, surrounded by "USA" flags waving in the wind ๐ŸŒŸ]

[ Gif of Mark Pougatch trying to hold a TV screen up high, with sweat dripping down his face ๐Ÿ˜“]

[Image of a person shrugging, with the words "BBC all day" written above it ๐Ÿ‘]
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but... I think ITV's move to New York might backfire ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ. Don't get me wrong, having Gary Neville and Roy Keane on board is a big plus, but let's be real, it's gonna be tough for them to compete with the BBC's global reach ๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ’ฅ. I mean, who wants to watch football from behind a crowded New York City skyline when you can watch it from, say, Wembley Stadium? ๐ŸŸ๏ธ Not me, that's for sure ๐Ÿ˜‚.

I also don't think ITV's 51 matches are gonna be enough ๐Ÿ’ธ. The BBC has secured some big ones, including England's group stage fixtures and semi-finals ๐Ÿค. And let's not forget about the sustainability aspect - I get it, reducing carbon emissions is important, but sometimes you gotta put your money where your mouth is ๐Ÿ’ธ.

I don't think ITV's ratings battle is gonna be as cutthroat as people think ๐Ÿ˜. The BBC has a long history of producing top-notch coverage, and I think they'll come out on top ๐Ÿ†. But hey, I could be wrong ๐Ÿ˜œ.
 
๐Ÿค” so like ITV thinks they can just hop across the pond and steal the World Cup ratings from BBC? ๐Ÿ˜‚ I mean, those guys have been doing it for years! The BBC has that kind of history and brand recognition that can't be replicated. And let's be real, their studios are always top-notch ๐Ÿ“บ. ITV is basically trying to compensate for something by being all fancy with the NYC studio view ๐ŸŒ†. Not sure how much of a difference that's gonna make in the end... still think BBC has this one in the bag ๐Ÿ‘
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but I'm kinda surprised by the BBC deciding to stick around in Salford ๐Ÿค”. I mean, it makes sense cost-wise and all that environmental jazz ๐Ÿ’š. But ITV's plan to do everything from New York is pretty bold, right? I don't know if they'll actually pull off getting huge audiences with a studio setup across the ocean ๐ŸŒŠ. And what about the travelogues and mini docs? Won't those be kinda hard to film in NYC when there are still loads of matches happening elsewhere around the world? ๐Ÿ“บ Still, it's all just speculation at this point... I guess we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out ๐Ÿ”ด
 
lol what's going on with the World Cup coverage? ๐Ÿคฏ I remember watching the 2018 tournament in Russia and it was amazing! anyway, I think its cool that ITV is getting that studio in Brooklyn, but like 51 matches ain't gonna cut it lol ITV needs to step up their game if they wanna compete with the BBC. ๐Ÿ“บ
 
I gotta say, I'm surprised ITV is jumping at the chance to broadcast World Cup from New York. The energy and vibe from NYC must be huge ๐ŸŒ†. But for me, it's all about consistency and familiarity when it comes to football coverage. I remember watching BBC's coverage with my dad during the 2018 World Cup in Russia โ€“ he was always glued to the TV and never missed a match ๐Ÿ˜Š. The fact that ITV is gonna have some of England legends like Gary Neville and Roy Keane commentating adds an extra layer of excitement, though! Can't wait for June ๐ŸŽ‰.
 
omg what's up with these two broadcast teams ๐Ÿค”? BBC is all about savin' the planet and stickin' to UK, but ITV is all about gettin' that NYC studio and makin' it big in the ratings game ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿ—ผ๏ธ. 51 matches for ITV, though, that's a lot of football! ๐Ÿ€ but at the same time BBC got some sick views last time around... 15 million peeps watchin' the final! ๐Ÿ’ฅ what's goin down? are these two teams just gonna keep on competin' all summer long?
 
idk why bbc is being so eco-friendly about this ๐ŸŒŽ i mean, dont get me wrong, reduced carbon emissions are important but 15 mil viewers for the world cup final? that's a huge audience! ITV seems to be playing it safe by moving to new york but i think they might be missing out on something special if they dont take advantage of their london studio ๐Ÿค”
 
I dont think its fair on the BBC tho ๐Ÿค” ITV might be getting that New York studio but they're paying a premium for it. I mean, have you seen those prices in Brooklyn? its like another country over there ๐Ÿคฏ. The BBC is making some smart decisions here tho, reducing carbon emissions and all that jazz is super important for our future planet ๐ŸŒŽ
 
I'M ALL ABOUT IT WHEN IT COMES TO THE BBC DECIDING TO KEEP THINGS LOCAL FOR THE WORLD CUP! I MEAN, DON'T GET ME WRONG, ITV'S NEW YORK STUDIO IS GOING TO BE SICK, BUT COME ON, ยฃMillions FOR FLIGHTS AND HOTEL ROOMS? NO THANKS!!! THE BEEB IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING IT REAL AND FOCUSED ON SUSTAINABILITY ๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ’š
 
I'm kinda surprised the BBC didn't wanna move to NY ๐Ÿค”... I mean, I get that they're tryin' to save some cash and reduce carbon emissions, but it's like, this is a global event! ITV seems like it's makin' some smart moves by gettin' studio space in Brooklyn - not only does it give 'em a sick view of the Manhattan skyline ๐ŸŒ†, but it also lets 'em showcase their global reach. I'm still thinkin' about how they're gonna make this whole thing work with all those pundits and travelogues, though... it's like, Gary Neville and Roy Keane are in NY for the summer? That's a big commitment!
 
its weird that BBC is prioritizing cost and environment over going to new york ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ but ITV is risking the ratings by doing the opposite, i guess they wanna gain an early advantage in the battle, good luck with that lol ๐Ÿ˜…, but what if theyre not prepared for the competition? we'll see how it goes this summer...
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, isn't it kinda weird that ITV is gonna be broadcasting the World Cup from New York while the BBC sticks to Salford? ๐ŸŒ† I guess ITV really wants to get ahead in those ratings ๐Ÿ˜…. But, like, I don't know if they're making the right call considering how big the BBC's audience is for their World Cup coverage... 15 million peeps tuning in last time is no joke! ๐Ÿ’ฅ Still, I suppose it's cool that ITV gets a fancy studio with a Manhattan skyline view ๐Ÿ™๏ธ. And, omg, Gary Neville and Roy Keane as pundits? That's gonna be lit ๐Ÿ”ฅ!
 
๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ‘€ You know what I'm thinking? The BBC is basically saying "forget the extra cost and environmental hassle" to stay put in Salford ๐Ÿค”. Costs are through the roof for FIFA's whole World Cup thing, so they're like "why bother moving?" Meanwhile ITV is all "hey, let's spend a ton of money on a fancy studio in NYC and hope we can outdo the BBC!" ๐Ÿ—ผ๏ธ And you know what? I think it's gonna be super interesting to see how their schedules play out... 51 matches for ITV vs 54 for the BBC. That's like, a whole extra game ๐ŸŽฎ. But let me tell you, when ITV does get to broadcast solo, they bring in the big guns with Neville, Keane, and Wright ๐Ÿคฏ. And have you seen the audiences for England's Women's Euro? 10.2 million people can't be wrong! ๐Ÿ’ฅ

Stats alert:

* BBC World Cup final peak audience (2022): 15M
* ITV England women's Euro semi-final peak audience (2025): 10.2M ๐Ÿ“Š
* FIFA World Cup costs: estimated $1Billion+ ๐Ÿ˜ฑ
 
๐Ÿ˜‚ the BBC is all about savin' a buck and goin green, I guess you could say they're the "eco-warriors" of the World Cup coverage world ๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ’ธ but ITV's New York studio looks like it'll be the place to be for those who want to see the beautiful game with a side of Big Apple views ๐Ÿ—ฝ๏ธ๐ŸŽ‰ and who knows, maybe Gary Neville will finally get his NYC penthouse apartment ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ 
 
OMG, I'm kinda surprised the BBC didn't move to NYC like ITV did ๐Ÿค”. I mean, getting that Manhattan skyline view would've been amazing! But then again, all that traveling can add up and be super expensive ๐Ÿ’ธ. I can see why they prioritized cost over having a sick studio setup ๐Ÿ˜Š. As for me, I'm just hyped to watch some World Cup matches with my friends this summer ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ†. Can't wait to see what Gary Neville and Roy Keane will bring to ITV's coverage ๐Ÿค”!
 
Back
Top