Wayne County Circuit Judge Annette Berry has handed a significant blow to Detroit Thermal in the long-standing dispute over the utility company's plans to reroute steam lines through historic Lafayette Park. The decision, issued in a 22-page opinion, rejects Detroit Thermal's main legal arguments and keeps in place a court order blocking the company from accessing the private property for the project.
The dispute centers on the legitimacy of decades-old easements originally granted to Detroit Edison, which would allow Detroit Thermal to cross into the protected greenspace. However, Berry concluded that these easements were narrow in scope, granted for specific purposes, and described as licenses rather than permanent property rights.
Furthermore, the judge ruled that even if the easements are valid, they cannot be expanded to create a new or greater burden on private land than originally contemplated. This finding supports the plaintiffs' argument that the easements have been abandoned or automatically revoked due to changes in ownership of the land and the fact that the steam system has gone unused for decades.
Berry also rejected Detroit Thermal's claim that the lawsuit was filed too late and that any alleged harm was speculative. The judge found that the residents adequately alleged Detroit Thermal entered the property without authorization after fencing off portions of the greenspace and bringing in heavy equipment earlier this year, which could constitute trespass if the easements are no longer valid.
The court declined to dismiss the residents' nuisance claims and refused to send the case to the Michigan Public Service Commission, ruling that the agency regulates rates and service, not property ownership or quiet title disputes. As a result, the case will proceed towards trial.
Detroit Thermal has criticized the court's rulings, warning they could have far-reaching implications for the use of public utility infrastructure in the state. The company stated that if the rationale underlying these orders stands, it poses grave risks to residents who rely on the steam service and to all users of public utility services.
In contrast, townhome residents argue that the dispute involves private property rights and a nationally protected historic landscape, not routine utility maintenance on public land. They claim that Detroit Thermal is mischaracterizing the case and that the court's decisions are in their favor.
A jury trial has been scheduled for July 2026, with the temporary restraining order issued by Berry remaining in effect until then.
The dispute centers on the legitimacy of decades-old easements originally granted to Detroit Edison, which would allow Detroit Thermal to cross into the protected greenspace. However, Berry concluded that these easements were narrow in scope, granted for specific purposes, and described as licenses rather than permanent property rights.
Furthermore, the judge ruled that even if the easements are valid, they cannot be expanded to create a new or greater burden on private land than originally contemplated. This finding supports the plaintiffs' argument that the easements have been abandoned or automatically revoked due to changes in ownership of the land and the fact that the steam system has gone unused for decades.
Berry also rejected Detroit Thermal's claim that the lawsuit was filed too late and that any alleged harm was speculative. The judge found that the residents adequately alleged Detroit Thermal entered the property without authorization after fencing off portions of the greenspace and bringing in heavy equipment earlier this year, which could constitute trespass if the easements are no longer valid.
The court declined to dismiss the residents' nuisance claims and refused to send the case to the Michigan Public Service Commission, ruling that the agency regulates rates and service, not property ownership or quiet title disputes. As a result, the case will proceed towards trial.
Detroit Thermal has criticized the court's rulings, warning they could have far-reaching implications for the use of public utility infrastructure in the state. The company stated that if the rationale underlying these orders stands, it poses grave risks to residents who rely on the steam service and to all users of public utility services.
In contrast, townhome residents argue that the dispute involves private property rights and a nationally protected historic landscape, not routine utility maintenance on public land. They claim that Detroit Thermal is mischaracterizing the case and that the court's decisions are in their favor.
A jury trial has been scheduled for July 2026, with the temporary restraining order issued by Berry remaining in effect until then.