Federal Judges Order Trump Administration to Continue Funding SNAP Amid Shutdown
A pair of federal judges has ruled that the Trump administration must continue to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest food aid program, using emergency reserve funds during the ongoing government shutdown.
The rulings came in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, with both judges ordering the federal government to use at least some of the contingency funds available for SNAP. The SNAP program serves nearly one-in-eight Americans and provides critical support to millions of people struggling with poverty.
In their rulings, the judges deemed the administration's decision to pause SNAP payments as "unlawful" and stated that the program must be funded using the emergency reserve funds. The USDA had previously planned to freeze payments starting on November 1 due to funding concerns, but the judges' orders have given lawmakers breathing room to address the issue.
The decisions come despite the administration's assertion that it cannot use the contingency funds for SNAP, and instead claim that they need more clarity before proceeding with the program. President Trump took to social media to blast congressional Democrats for their handling of the shutdown, suggesting that the government would comply with the rulings but also needed further direction.
SNAP recipients and advocates are breathing a sigh of relief at the news, knowing that benefits will not be halted entirely. However, many remain concerned about the possibility of reduced benefits or delayed payments, which could leave millions struggling to access food assistance.
The decision is seen as a victory for Democrats, who had been pushing for the administration to continue funding SNAP during the shutdown. "The court's ruling protects millions of families, seniors, and veterans from being used as leverage in a political fight and upholds the principle that no one in America should go hungry," said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward.
As lawmakers struggle to find a solution, advocates warn that even temporary delays or reductions in SNAP benefits could have devastating consequences for those already struggling with poverty. With the shutdown showing no signs of ending, the ongoing uncertainty surrounding SNAP funding is likely to remain a major issue for weeks to come.
A pair of federal judges has ruled that the Trump administration must continue to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest food aid program, using emergency reserve funds during the ongoing government shutdown.
The rulings came in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, with both judges ordering the federal government to use at least some of the contingency funds available for SNAP. The SNAP program serves nearly one-in-eight Americans and provides critical support to millions of people struggling with poverty.
In their rulings, the judges deemed the administration's decision to pause SNAP payments as "unlawful" and stated that the program must be funded using the emergency reserve funds. The USDA had previously planned to freeze payments starting on November 1 due to funding concerns, but the judges' orders have given lawmakers breathing room to address the issue.
The decisions come despite the administration's assertion that it cannot use the contingency funds for SNAP, and instead claim that they need more clarity before proceeding with the program. President Trump took to social media to blast congressional Democrats for their handling of the shutdown, suggesting that the government would comply with the rulings but also needed further direction.
SNAP recipients and advocates are breathing a sigh of relief at the news, knowing that benefits will not be halted entirely. However, many remain concerned about the possibility of reduced benefits or delayed payments, which could leave millions struggling to access food assistance.
The decision is seen as a victory for Democrats, who had been pushing for the administration to continue funding SNAP during the shutdown. "The court's ruling protects millions of families, seniors, and veterans from being used as leverage in a political fight and upholds the principle that no one in America should go hungry," said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward.
As lawmakers struggle to find a solution, advocates warn that even temporary delays or reductions in SNAP benefits could have devastating consequences for those already struggling with poverty. With the shutdown showing no signs of ending, the ongoing uncertainty surrounding SNAP funding is likely to remain a major issue for weeks to come.