"Kill them all": Hegseth ordered strike on survivors of US attack

US Defense Secretary Under Fire for Ordering "Kill Them All" Strike

In a shocking revelation, the Washington Post has exposed a bombshell order given by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a September 2 maritime strike off the coast of Trinidad. The incident has sparked outrage and raised serious questions about the administration's handling of counter-drug operations.

According to officials with direct knowledge of the mission, US special operations forces targeted a small vessel suspected of transporting narcotics. Following the first missile strike that destroyed the boat and killed most of the crew, observers reported seeing at least two survivors clinging to debris. Hegseth allegedly directed forces to launch a second strike to eliminate the remaining survivors, which experts describe as potentially unlawful under long-standing rules of armed conflict.

The strike was not part of any declared war, leaving many wondering how the administration has justified such lethal operations. A Justice Department memo reportedly classifies drug trafficking networks as part of a "non-international armed conflict," effectively granting the executive branch sweeping authority to kill suspected traffickers on the high seas. Critics argue that this interpretation is legally flimsy and dangerously broad.

Human rights groups and former military lawyers warn that the decision could set a precedent for unchecked lethal force far beyond US borders. "If this stands, the US is claiming the right to kill anyone, anywhere, based on secret intelligence and no transparency," one legal expert told the Post.

Hegseth has responded to the allegations, calling them "fabricated" and framing the operations as lawful efforts to stop narco-terrorists and destroy drug-trafficking vessels. He emphasized his support for the Southcom forces carrying out the missions.

The incident has left many families of the dead without answers, while members of Congress are now calling for hearings to address the concerns raised by this unprecedented escalation in US counter-drug operations. The White House is facing mounting questions about its handling of national security, and the fallout from Hegseth's alleged order is expected to continue for some time.
 
๐Ÿ˜’ I mean, what's up with these drone strikes? Like, can't they just negotiate or something? This "kill them all" s**t is wild. ๐Ÿคฏ I remember when Trump was President, there were so many complaints about torture and stuff, but it looks like the next gen of politicians are just taking it to a whole new level. What's wrong with due process, right? ๐Ÿ™„ I'm not saying they're definitely in the wrong here, but come on, this is some Grey's Anatomy-level "morally ambiguous" stuff right here... or something ๐Ÿ˜…
 
๐Ÿคฏ This is so messed up! I mean, come on, who orders a "kill them all" strike? It sounds like something out of a movie or a bad game of military strategy. The fact that they're saying it's okay because they think drug trafficking networks are part of a non-international armed conflict... yeah no thanks ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. I don't buy it for a second.

And can we talk about how this sets a precedent? Like, what's next? Are they gonna start killing people who are just suspected of something on the streets? It's scary to think about how far-reaching this could go and how easily it could be abused by the executive branch. I'm all for taking down narco-traffickers, but not at the cost of human lives and basic rights.

And what about accountability? If someone orders a strike that kills innocent people, shouldn't they face consequences? It's like the whole thing is just this big grey area where nothing matters except winning or maintaining power. Not cool, man ๐Ÿค•.
 
man this is so messed up ๐Ÿคฏ. i'm all for taking down narco-terrorists but "kill them all" isn't exactly the most constructive approach you know? it's just gonna create more problems than it solves. and what's with the 'non-international armed conflict' thing? sounds like a bunch of bureaucratic jargon to me ๐Ÿ™„. we should be having real conversations about how we're handling these situations, not sweeping them under the rug.

and have you seen the families of those who got killed? they deserve answers, not just empty apologies from Hegseth or whoever else is trying to cover this up ๐Ÿค•. it's time for some real accountability and transparency around our national security operations.
 
I'm super worried about this ๐Ÿ˜ž. I mean, who gives an order like "kill them all"? It's just crazy. I can understand the fight against narco-trafficking, but killing innocent people on the high seas? That's not right. We're always talking about human rights and dignity, but when it comes to US operations, it seems like no one's really holding anyone accountable ๐Ÿ™„. The fact that some lawyers are calling it "legally flimsy" makes me wonder what's really going on behind the scenes. It's not just about national security; it's about basic human decency ๐Ÿ’”. I hope Congress gets to the bottom of this and gives those families some answers ๐Ÿ‘ฅ
 
I'm literally so confused ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean, isn't it kinda reasonable that they're trying to take down these narco-trafficking vessels that are allegedly harming innocent lives? Like, isn't that a legit goal for the US military? ๐Ÿค” But at the same time, like, what's up with this "kill them all" order? Can't we just try to apprehend people or something instead of resorting to lethal force? ๐Ÿ’€ I mean, it's not like they're going around killing innocent civilians willy-nilly... or are they? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

And then there's the whole "non-international armed conflict" thing. Like, what even is that? Sounds super legit and totally not a way for the government to get away with murder ๐Ÿ˜…. But at the same time, can't we be like, "Hey, let's make sure we're following some actual rules here"? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

I'm literally torn apart by this whole thing ๐Ÿ’”... I guess what I'm saying is that it's super problematic on one hand, but maybe not entirely unreasonable on the other? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Ugh, my brain hurts ๐Ÿ™„.
 
๐Ÿคฏ I mean, come on... who gives orders like that? "Kill them all"? That's not even a military tactic, that's just plain crazy talk! And now we're supposed to believe it was "lawful" because they were fighting narco-terrorists? Give me a break. It's just an excuse for the government to do whatever they want without any accountability. I'm all for taking down bad guys, but not when it comes at the cost of innocent lives. And what about due process? Didn't we used to care about that sort of thing? This whole thing reeks of a power grab and a lack of transparency. We need answers now! ๐Ÿ’ฅ
 
Umm this is so messed up ๐Ÿคฏ... like what exactly is going on here? So supposedly Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth orders a strike that kills most of the people on a boat, but then he wants to kill the ones who survived too? Like, isn't that just crazy? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ And how can they justify this with some super broad definition of war that basically lets them just kill anyone suspected of being involved in narco-trafficking? It doesn't seem right at all... and what about human rights? I mean we always hear about the US talking about protecting human rights, but it seems like they're doing the opposite here ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. This whole thing needs to be looked into ASAP, imo ๐Ÿ‘ฎ
 
๐Ÿคฏ just read that the US Defense Secretary ordered a "kill them all" strike ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ’ฅ and I'm totally blown away by the lack of oversight ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Like, what even is going on here? ๐Ÿค” The fact that they're classifying drug trafficking as a "non-international armed conflict" ๐Ÿ“ is giving me major red flags ๐Ÿšจ. It's like they're trying to justify murder on the high seas ๐Ÿ’€. And don't even get me started on how this will set a precedent for unchecked lethal force ๐Ÿšซ. We need more transparency and accountability in our government, not less ๐Ÿ™„. The fact that families of the dead are still waiting for answers is just devastating ๐Ÿ˜”. We gotta hold our leaders accountable for their actions ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
OMG, can you even believe what went down out there?! ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, i know we all hate cartels but come on, ordering a "kill them all" strike? That's just wild west territory right there ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿšซ. And now the whole nation is talking about it and people are super mad.

I'm not even surprised though - our country has always been known for being extra aggressive when it comes to national security. ๐Ÿค But this is like, a whole new level of secretive and potentially unlawful ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’”.

I do think it's good that the families of those who died are getting some answers tho ๐Ÿ˜ข. And let's be real, Congress needs to step in here ASAP โฐ because we can't just sit back and watch our government make decisions without being held accountable ๐Ÿ‘Š.

It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out ๐Ÿค”... one thing is for sure - it's gonna be a wild ride ๐Ÿ˜…!
 
man this is so disturbing ๐Ÿค• i dont think we should just send people to die willy nilly over narco trafficking...i mean we know it's a big issue but is killing every last one of them the answer? seems like there's more than just guns and bombs in fighting crime...let's find ways to talk people down from this sorta thing ๐Ÿ’ก
 
Back
Top