US President's Environmental Agency in Chaos as Trump Rolls Back Toxic Chemical Regulations
A bitter feud has erupted between supporters of Donald Trump, known as Maha (Make America Healthy Again), and his Republican counterpart, Maga (Make America Great Again), over the recent roll-back of toxic chemical regulations by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The controversy revolves around EPA administrator Lee Zeldin's swift dismantling of safeguards designed to protect public health from the negative impacts of chemicals.
The Maha movement, which helped propel Trump to office on a promise to clean up the nation's water and food supply, is now vehemently opposed to the administration's actions, claiming they are prioritizing corporate interests over human well-being. The group has launched a petition calling for Trump to fire Zeldin, citing his efforts to fast-track pesticide approvals and reduce scrutiny of new chemicals.
Critics argue that these moves will lead to higher rates of chronic disease, increased medical costs, and an unsustainable strain on the healthcare system. Maha leaders, including influencers such as Zen Honeycutt and Kelly Ryerson, point to Zeldin's appointment of chemical industry executives to top positions at the EPA's chemicals office and the agency's decision to permit the use of dicamba, a toxic pesticide banned in many other countries.
The Trump administration's close ties with the chemical and pesticides industry have fueled accusations that they are putting profits over people. The EPA has announced plans to approve more "forever chemicals" for use in pesticides, despite mounting evidence of their devastating impact on human health.
Maha supporters believe that Zeldin can reverse some of these damaging policies if he truly believes in the movement's mission. Vani Hari, a Maha influencer, says that by changing the EPA's definition of PFAS, used in pesticides, Zeldin could "put an end to this" and demonstrate his commitment to public health.
The controversy has sparked a heated debate about the role of science in policymaking and the influence of corporate interests on government decisions. As the feud between Maha and Maga continues to escalate, one thing is clear: the fate of toxic chemical regulations hangs in the balance, with far-reaching consequences for public health and the environment.
A bitter feud has erupted between supporters of Donald Trump, known as Maha (Make America Healthy Again), and his Republican counterpart, Maga (Make America Great Again), over the recent roll-back of toxic chemical regulations by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The controversy revolves around EPA administrator Lee Zeldin's swift dismantling of safeguards designed to protect public health from the negative impacts of chemicals.
The Maha movement, which helped propel Trump to office on a promise to clean up the nation's water and food supply, is now vehemently opposed to the administration's actions, claiming they are prioritizing corporate interests over human well-being. The group has launched a petition calling for Trump to fire Zeldin, citing his efforts to fast-track pesticide approvals and reduce scrutiny of new chemicals.
Critics argue that these moves will lead to higher rates of chronic disease, increased medical costs, and an unsustainable strain on the healthcare system. Maha leaders, including influencers such as Zen Honeycutt and Kelly Ryerson, point to Zeldin's appointment of chemical industry executives to top positions at the EPA's chemicals office and the agency's decision to permit the use of dicamba, a toxic pesticide banned in many other countries.
The Trump administration's close ties with the chemical and pesticides industry have fueled accusations that they are putting profits over people. The EPA has announced plans to approve more "forever chemicals" for use in pesticides, despite mounting evidence of their devastating impact on human health.
Maha supporters believe that Zeldin can reverse some of these damaging policies if he truly believes in the movement's mission. Vani Hari, a Maha influencer, says that by changing the EPA's definition of PFAS, used in pesticides, Zeldin could "put an end to this" and demonstrate his commitment to public health.
The controversy has sparked a heated debate about the role of science in policymaking and the influence of corporate interests on government decisions. As the feud between Maha and Maga continues to escalate, one thing is clear: the fate of toxic chemical regulations hangs in the balance, with far-reaching consequences for public health and the environment.