Marco Rubio Orders State Dept to Stop Using Calibri Font in Anti-DEI Push

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered the US State Department to switch back to Times New Roman font for all official government documents, in what appears to be an attempt to counteract the adoption of a more accessible sans-serif font, Calibri. This move comes as part of his broader efforts to purge any perceived elements of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) from the department.

Rubio's memo, which was obtained by news outlets, explicitly states that the switch is aimed at "restoring decorum and professionalism" to the department's written work products. The language used in the memo is telling, as it implies that Calibri, a font widely used for its ease of use by people with visual disabilities, was somehow tied to DEI initiatives.

DEIA programs are designed to promote equality and inclusion within government, and many sans-serif fonts like Calibri have been adopted due to their accessibility features. However, Rubio's order appears to be driven by a more sinister motive - to alienate certain groups from the department's communications.

The move is also part of President Donald Trump's broader agenda to remake the US into an authoritarian and less inclusive society. By ordering a return to Times New Roman, Rubio and Trump are effectively sending a message that any language or communication style deemed too "woke" will be suppressed.

In reality, font choices in government may seem like a trivial matter, but this move is part of a larger effort to exclude certain groups from the national conversation. By targeting accessibility features and DEI initiatives, Trump and Rubio are attempting to remake the US into a more exclusive society - one where only those who align with their vision are welcome.

The switch away from Calibri may seem like a minor adjustment, but it's a clear indication of the administration's intentions: to silence dissenting voices, exclude marginalized groups, and promote a narrow, authoritarian agenda.
 
omg, what's with this move?! πŸ™„ they're literally trying to stifle diversity and inclusion in the US State Department! switching back to Times New Roman just because it's "more traditional" is SO not the point - it's about alienating people with disabilities and anyone who thinks inclusivity matters πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. like, come on, Calibri has been around for a reason - it's accessible! who cares if it's "too modern"? πŸ™ƒ and let's be real, this move is all about Trump's agenda to suppress dissenting voices and promote his own brand of authoritarianism πŸ’”. font choice shouldn't even matter, but apparently it does when you're trying to silence marginalized groups πŸ‘Š
 
lol what's next? they're gonna tell us how to type now? 🀣 i'm all for some professionalism, but come on, Rubio and Trump are like the font police. it's literally about exclusion, not accessibility. i mean, who needs Calibri if you can't even use Times New Roman without feeling like you're part of the 'woke' club? πŸ™„ this whole thing is a joke, right?
 
just had to share my thoughts on this 🀯, i mean, font choice is not everything, right? πŸ˜‚ but seriously, this move by Rubio and Trump is just another example of them trying to control every aspect of life in the US. newsflash: we don't need more rules or restrictions 🚫, what we need is freedom of speech and expression. and if people with visual disabilities can use Calibri, who cares? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ it's all about accessibility and inclusion 🌈, not some arbitrary attempt to silence certain voices. this move is just a big ol' red flag ⚠️, warning us that we're heading in the wrong direction 🚨
 
I'm low-key freaking out about this 🀯. The fact that the US Secretary of State is trying to revert back to Times New Roman font just because Calibri was used in DEIA programs is so concerning πŸ™„. It's like they're trying to control how we communicate and who gets left out of the conversation πŸ—£οΈ. I mean, fonts are literally a small detail, but it shows you what kind of values this administration has - all about exclusivity and silencing marginalized voices πŸ‘Ž. And let's be real, if that's the case, we're in for some serious trouble πŸ€₯.
 
πŸ€” I'm really not sure about this font switch thingy... Times New Roman was always my go-to too, but it feels like Rubio's trying to send a message with this decision πŸ“. What if Calibri was actually making documents more accessible for people with visual impairments? πŸ•°οΈ It just doesn't feel right that they're going back to a font that's not as user-friendly πŸ‘€. And what's up with the DEI stuff anyway? Can't we just focus on making government docs clear and easy to read without having to tackle accessibility issues? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I guess it all depends on how you see it, but this feels like a pretty big deal to me... 😬
 
I don't get why they're making such a big deal about font styles πŸ€”. Times New Roman is so last century! But seriously, this is like trying to rewrite history – if Calibri was the "DEI" font, then what's wrong with that? It's all about accessibility and inclusivity 🌈. And honestly, it feels like they're trying to control people's thoughts or something... like, who decides what's "professional" anyway? Shouldn't we be embracing diversity in everything, including fonts? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

Here's a simple diagram to show how font styles can affect people:
```
+---------------+
| Times New Rom |
| (old school) |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| Calibri |
| (accessible)|
+---------------+
```
Notice how one font is more "inclusive" 🀝. It's like, who cares about "decorum" when people can't see or read easily? πŸ™„
 
πŸ€” I mean, come on... a font change? It's just that kinda thing that makes you wanna roll your eyes πŸ˜’. I remember when I was in college, we had this prof who was super into fonts too (he even wrote a paper about it πŸ“š). He loved Calibri because it was so clean and easy to read. And now, apparently, it's some kinda identity marker for "wokes" πŸ™„. Newsflash: if you need a font that's accessible, it's not because you're being PC, it's just because there are people with visual disabilities who need help reading πŸ‘€.

And what's next? Are they gonna start policing the color palette of government documents too? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I mean, I get it, some folks might feel like Calibri is too... modern 😎. But come on, it's just a font! It's not like it's gonna change the world or anything 🌎. Just let people be and don't make a big deal out of this font fiasco πŸ’β€β™€οΈ.
 
πŸ€” this whole thing feels like a classic case of trying to control the narrative by controlling the details... like font size and style on official documents πŸ“ think about it, what's really being said here is that our leaders are more concerned with "decorum" than actually listening to and representing the diversity of their citizens πŸ‘₯ instead of embracing accessibility features as a way to include more people in the conversation, they're trying to force everyone back into a box that doesn't fit them πŸ’» it's like they think we're all just going to accept being talked down to because our documents are written in Times New Roman 😐
 
πŸ™„ This font fight is just another example of how out of touch some people are with reality. Like, who cares about font choice when there are real issues affecting people's lives? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Rubio thinks switching back to Times New Roman will somehow restore "decorum and professionalism" to the department's work? πŸ€” That just comes across as trying too hard to fit in a certain box. And what's with trying to tie Calibri use to DEI initiatives? It's like, just because you're trying to be inclusive doesn't mean you have to abandon accessibility features that actually help people πŸ’‘

And let's not forget the bigger picture here - this is all about silencing marginalized voices and promoting a narrow agenda. It's not about fonts; it's about control πŸ—£οΈ. Trump and Rubio are using every tool at their disposal to try and shape public opinion, even if it means picking on tiny details like font choice πŸ˜’
 
I mean come on πŸ™„, is this really what we need more of? Rubio's trying to tell us that accessibility features in fonts are somehow tied to DEI initiatives? Like, no one would even think of using Calibri if it wasn't for its ease of use by people with visual disabilities. It's like he thinks everyone who uses a sans-serif font is somehow part of the "woke" crowd πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ.

And let's not forget, this move is just another example of how the admin is trying to suppress dissenting voices and exclude marginalized groups from the conversation. I mean, what's next? Are they gonna start using Comic Sans again? πŸ˜‚ Just kidding (kinda). Seriously though, it's a slippery slope when we start making decisions based on font choices rather than actual policy changes.
 
I'm low-key concerned about this move... I mean, who thought switching back to Times New Roman was a good idea? πŸ€” It's not just about aesthetics, it's about the message you're sending out. If we're trying to be more inclusive and accessible, why would we go back to something that might make people with disabilities struggle to read? πŸ“š And let's be real, Rubio is basically saying that accessibility features are a "DEI" issue, which is just a euphemism for "we don't want anyone who doesn't fit our ideology in this room". πŸ‘₯ It's like they're trying to control the narrative and silence certain voices. That's not what government should be about... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm telling you, this is just another example of how deep they're digging into their pockets for control πŸ€‘. Times New Roman, Calibri... it's all about maintaining that status quo and silencing the masses πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. And Rubio thinks he's being all high and mighty with his "decorum and professionalism" act πŸ™„, but we know what's really going on here - they're just trying to create a more exclusive club for themselves πŸ‘₯.

And let's not forget, this is coming from the same people who claim to be fighting for freedom of speech... meanwhile, they're quietly choking off accessibility features and DEI initiatives πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. It's like, hello? You want us to trust you with our freedom of expression? First, you gotta give us the tools to express ourselves in the first place πŸ”§.

It's all about perception vs reality, my friend... they're trying to make us believe that this is just a minor tweak, but we see right through it 🀫. It's time to wake up and smell the tea β˜•οΈ - this administration is up to no good, and we need to hold them accountable πŸ’ͺ!
 
I'm so confused about this font thingy... I mean, Times New Roman is old news, Calibri was actually made for accessibility and now it's being kicked out? What's the dealio? Are they trying to make gov't docs less inclusive or something? πŸ€”πŸ“ I don't get why they can't just use a font that works for everyone... And what's with Rubio's memo, sounds like some fancy speak for "we're gonna be boring and stuffy now". πŸ™„πŸ‘Ž
 
I'm low-key impressed by Marco Rubio's attempt to bring back Times New Roman font, lol πŸ˜‚, but seriously, this move is so extra. Like, what even is the deal with trying to tie accessibility features to DEI initiatives? It's just lazy to pretend like Calibri isn't a great font for people with visual disabilities. And let's be real, if they're really worried about decorum and professionalism, maybe we should focus on making sure their memo-writing skills are on point first πŸ“.

And don't even get me started on the whole "remake the US into an authoritarian and less inclusive society" vibe πŸ˜’. I mean, come on, that's just a fancy way of saying they're trying to silence dissenting voices and exclude marginalized groups. Like, what's next? Are we going to start requiring official government documents to be written in Comic Sans too 🀣?

But for real, this move is part of a larger pattern of behavior from the administration, and it's super concerning πŸ”₯. We need to keep an eye on this stuff and make sure our government reps are representing all kinds of people, not just those who fit their narrow worldview 🌎.
 
omg yaaas i'm so down for Times New Roman!!! πŸ“šπŸ˜Ž i mean who needs accessibility features when you can have good ol' fashioned professionalism right? πŸ™„ it's like Rubio is trying to send a message that Calibri fans are just woke and extra πŸ€ͺ but let's be real, it's not like font choice has anything to do with being inclusive or not. it's all about maintaining the status quo and making those who are different feel uncomfortable πŸ‘Ž. and can we talk about how this is just another example of trump trying to silence dissenting voices? πŸ—£οΈ it's like he thinks he can control what we think by controlling our font choices lol what a joke 🀑
 
πŸ€” I'm not surprised by this move, tbh. It feels like they're trying to create a sense of "us vs them" within the department. Newsflash: font choices aren't about being inclusive or exclusive - it's just basic usability. Can't we focus on making documents more accessible for everyone instead of alienating certain groups? πŸ™„ The whole thing reeks of trying to suppress any kind of progressive thought. I mean, who needs Times New Roman anyway? It's like they're trying to make a statement about "traditional" values vs whatever those DEI programs are all about... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” The whole thing seems fishy to me... I mean, who makes font choices for official gov't documents? πŸ˜’ It's like they're trying to send a message that accessibility is optional or something. Newsflash: it's not! πŸ™„ Times New Roman vs Calibri, it's not about aesthetics, it's about being inclusive and respectful of people with disabilities. This whole thing reeks of an agenda to alienate certain groups and silence dissenting voices. And let's be real, font choices are a pretty low-hanging fruit for someone trying to send a message like this... πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ It's just another way to exert control over the narrative and push their own agenda without having to deal with actual policies or difficult conversations. πŸ‘Ž
 
come on... πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ font choice is not even that deep, right? its all about accessibility features like Calibri was making docs more accessible for people with visual disabilities. i mean whats wrong with being inclusive? πŸ™„ rubio's memo is just plain tone deaf, using phrases like "restoring decorum and professionalism" to justify a switch back to Times New Roman... yeah sure... it sounds like theyre trying to come across as all proper and stuff, but honestly its just a move to alienate certain groups from the department's communications. 🀝
 
omg is this for real?! switching back to Times New Roman just because some ppl think it's "decorum" is sooo extra πŸ™„ like who cares about font choices anyway? and whats with the DEI drama? can't we all just get along? πŸ€— i mean i guess its kinda sad that they're trying to alienate certain groups, but lets focus on actual issues instead of being super picky about fonts πŸ˜‚
 
Back
Top