Men need twice as much exercise as women to lower heart disease risk, study finds

Research Suggests Men Need Twice as Much Exercise as Women to Reduce Heart Disease Risk

A new study has found that men require twice as much exercise as women in order to experience the same level of reduction in coronary heart disease risk. The research, published in Nature Cardiovascular Research, analyzed data from over 80,000 participants and discovered that women who exercised for just 250 minutes a week saw a 30% decrease in their heart disease risk, whereas men needed nearly nine hours of exercise per week to achieve the same effect.

The study highlights the need for tailored advice when it comes to exercise for men and women, particularly given the fact that women are generally less physically active than men. According to current NHS guidelines, both men and women aged 16-64 should engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise per week, combined with muscle-strengthening activities twice a week.

However, the latest research suggests that these guidelines may not be sufficient for women, who can reap substantial health benefits from much less exercise. In fact, one in three women worldwide die from cardiovascular disease, and the study's findings have the potential to encourage women to become more active and improve their cardiovascular health.

The researchers behind the study point to differences in sex hormones, muscle fibers, and energy production as potential factors contributing to why women may benefit more from exercise than men. While scientists are still unsure about the underlying reasons for these differences, the research is clear: both men and women can experience significant cardiovascular benefits from regular physical activity.

The findings have been welcomed by experts, who argue that sex-specific strategies should be embedded into guidelines and tailored interventions developed to optimize cardiovascular health for women. As Dr Emily Lau, a specialist in women's cardiovascular health at Massachusetts General Hospital, noted: "This study provides further evidence that one size does not fit all and challenges us to move from conversation to action."
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, can you even believe it? Men need like, almost an entire day of exercise just to match what women do in a week! It's wild. And honestly, I think this is kinda crazy because I've seen so many female friends who are super active and still deal with heart issues. Like, what about all the women who are already rocking 30 minutes of exercise a day? Do they need more?! ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ

And can we talk about how the guidelines are just gonna get rewritten now? "Okay, men, do more, and women, do less" sounds like some kinda sexist nonsense to me. ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ But at the same time, I'm all for getting people moving and healthy! Maybe this is a sign that we need to rethink our whole approach to exercise and health.

I mean, Dr. Emily Lau said it so perfectly: "One size does not fit all." And now we're like, "Okay, let's make it personalized!" ๐Ÿ’ก Can't wait to see how this plays out in real life!
 
[fitness failure gif](https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7bnfLl4vVZzqQxW/giphy.gif) Men need more exercise because they're just big ol' boys... [chuckle emoticon] ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ’ช But seriously, who knew men needed twice as much exercise to be healthy? Maybe we can get them to join a fitness class or something? [exercise motivation meme](https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7d1zIvL6t8cQGpDm/giphy.gif)
 
I'm actually kinda surprised by this study ๐Ÿค”. I mean, I know guys can get really into fitness and stuff, but it's still cool to see that women need less exercise to reap the same benefits ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ. It just makes sense, though - like, have you ever seen a lady lift weights or run a marathon? Not exactly common, right? ๐Ÿ˜‚ But seriously, I think it's awesome that this study is shedding light on how sex differences can affect our health and fitness goals. Maybe we need to rethink those one-size-fits-all gym classes ๐Ÿšซ and start tailoring our advice to each individual's needs ๐Ÿ’ก. And hey, if it means more women are getting active and living healthier lives, I'm all for it ๐Ÿ’–.
 
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ so it's finally being acknowledged that men need more exercise than women? like, what took so long? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ anyway, glad some scientists are willing to dive into this and maybe we'll get some tailored advice for the ladies. I mean, who needs a one-size-fits-all approach when you can tailor it to your sex hormones, muscle fibers, and energy production... sounds like a real game-changer ๐Ÿ˜’
 
I was just thinking about my cat the other day, you know? I have this little furball at home who loves to watch birds outside the window. It's so hilarious how she gets distracted by every single bird that flies by. Anyway, back to exercise... it's crazy to think that women can get the same benefits from like, half the amount of exercise as men do! I mean, I'm all for people getting active and healthy, but it just goes to show that we should probably tailor our fitness advice to fit individual needs rather than just using one-size-fits-all rules. And yeah, cardiovascular disease is such a big deal... my aunt passed away from it a few years ago, so it's definitely something that resonates with me ๐Ÿ˜Š
 
omg, can you believe this? men need like, almost twice as much exercise as women and still we're expecting everyone to follow those same NHS guidelines ๐Ÿ™„. it's just crazy. i mean, i know women are less active on average but that doesn't mean we should be expected to get the same benefit from so little exercise. 150 minutes a week is like, nothing for me - i'm already doing more than that in one day lol.

and can we talk about how the body just works differently for women? it's not rocket science, people! sex hormones and muscle fibers are what they are, so why aren't we taking that into account when making these guidelines? it's all about creating tailored advice for both men and women. i'm so glad scientists are finally catching on ๐Ÿค“.

anyway, this study is giving me hope. maybe now we'll see more targeted interventions for women and actual results will show us how much exercise we really need to be healthy. fingers crossed! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
Exercise is like, super important for our hearts ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’–. But honestly, I'm kinda surprised that women need less exercise than men to reduce their heart disease risk ๐Ÿ˜ฎ. Like, 250 minutes a week is still pretty achievable, right? ๐Ÿ˜… And it's crazy how much more exercise men need compared to women - nearly nine hours of exercise per week?! That's like, a whole weekend ๐Ÿคฏ.

I think this study highlights how important it is to tailor advice for men and women when it comes to exercise. I mean, we all know that women are generally less active than men, so these guidelines might not be working as well for them as they do for us guys ๐Ÿ˜Š. But on the other hand, women can get some serious health benefits from way less exercise - it's like, a win-win ๐ŸŽ‰.

I'm excited to see what other research comes out of this study and how we can optimize cardiovascular health for both men and women ๐Ÿ’ช. And yeah, one in three women worldwide die from cardiovascular disease... that's just heartbreaking ๐Ÿ˜”. We need to do more to support our female friends and family members in getting active and healthy ๐Ÿค—.
 
๐Ÿค” so this is pretty interesting, right? basically the research says men need way more exercise than women to reduce heart disease risk... like nearly 9 hours a week compared to 250 minutes for women. that's crazy! ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ i mean, i get it, women are less active on average and all, but still 9 hours is a lot of time to be running around. my girlfriend is pretty athletic and she thinks this is gonna make her exercise even more... maybe? ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
I'm thinking exercise guidelines need a major revamp ๐Ÿค”. I mean, 150 minutes a week is pretty laid-back for women and it's only like half the time men are supposed to be doing. It doesn't seem right that women would get more benefits with less effort. Maybe they just lose weight or something easier? ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
omg I'm shocked that men need almost 9 hours of exercise per week to reduce heart disease risk whereas women can get away with just 250 minutes a week ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ’ช it's crazy how much more active we should be than we are now, especially considering one in three women worldwide die from cardiovascular disease each year ๐Ÿ’” I totally agree that the current NHS guidelines need an update, maybe it's time to make exercise even more accessible and fun for everyone ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’ƒ
 
I gotta say, I was kinda surprised by this news ๐Ÿค”... Like, I always thought we were all supposed to be pretty much equal when it comes to exercise, right? But apparently, there's a difference between men and women when it comes to how much exercise we need. And honestly, 9 hours a week sounds like a lot of time for me ๐Ÿ˜…

I've got a friend who's super into fitness and she's always saying that exercising is so important for heart health... and now I'm starting to think maybe she was onto something ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ. But at the same time, I feel bad for women who are already pretty active and still need to do more? It just feels like there should be some middle ground or something.

I guess what's cool is that scientists are finally recognizing the differences between men and women when it comes to exercise... maybe we can learn from each other and find ways to make exercise more accessible and enjoyable for everyone ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
Back
Top