Disaster Cleanup Workers in Michigan Settled Out of Court Over COVID-19 Concerns
A group of disaster-recovery workers who were hired to clean up after the devastating May 2020 dam failures and flooding in Midland, Michigan, have settled their lawsuit alleging they were exposed to hazardous conditions during the early pandemic. The Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice announced this week that the case has been resolved through a confidential settlement.
The lawsuit claimed that over 100 workers, many of whom were recruited from out-of-state, were put in unsanitary and overcrowded conditions while performing cleanup work at multiple sites, including hospitals, golf courses, and universities. The plaintiffs alleged they were housed in hotel rooms with as few as four people sharing a bed, transported in crowded vans, and required to gather indoors for daily briefings without social distancing.
The lawsuit also claimed that the defendants failed to implement basic COVID-19 safety protocols, such as proper preparedness plans, training, screening procedures, and sanitation measures. As workers began showing symptoms of COVID-19, public health officials advised them to remain in Michigan to isolate or quarantine, but key guidance was not properly communicated. Many workers became severely ill, requiring hospitalization and ventilator support.
The lawsuit named multiple defendants, including SERVPRO Industries LLC, BTN Services LLC, Favreau, Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc., RDM Holding Co., and RACM, L.L.C. The settlement resolves allegations of negligence and violations of wage and sick-leave protections, as well as other state and federal claims.
John Philo, executive director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, stated that the lawsuit settlement sends a strong message about prioritizing worker safety during public health emergencies. "This outcome represents a major step forward for resilience workers who are often placed in hazardous environments with limited power to speak up," he said. "It affirms that companies responding to disasters must prioritize worker safety."
Saket Soni, executive director of Resilience Force, an organization representing the workers, added that the lawsuit was about standing up for workers' rights. "We hope this outcome drives meaningful industry-wide change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies," he said.
A group of disaster-recovery workers who were hired to clean up after the devastating May 2020 dam failures and flooding in Midland, Michigan, have settled their lawsuit alleging they were exposed to hazardous conditions during the early pandemic. The Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice announced this week that the case has been resolved through a confidential settlement.
The lawsuit claimed that over 100 workers, many of whom were recruited from out-of-state, were put in unsanitary and overcrowded conditions while performing cleanup work at multiple sites, including hospitals, golf courses, and universities. The plaintiffs alleged they were housed in hotel rooms with as few as four people sharing a bed, transported in crowded vans, and required to gather indoors for daily briefings without social distancing.
The lawsuit also claimed that the defendants failed to implement basic COVID-19 safety protocols, such as proper preparedness plans, training, screening procedures, and sanitation measures. As workers began showing symptoms of COVID-19, public health officials advised them to remain in Michigan to isolate or quarantine, but key guidance was not properly communicated. Many workers became severely ill, requiring hospitalization and ventilator support.
The lawsuit named multiple defendants, including SERVPRO Industries LLC, BTN Services LLC, Favreau, Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc., RDM Holding Co., and RACM, L.L.C. The settlement resolves allegations of negligence and violations of wage and sick-leave protections, as well as other state and federal claims.
John Philo, executive director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, stated that the lawsuit settlement sends a strong message about prioritizing worker safety during public health emergencies. "This outcome represents a major step forward for resilience workers who are often placed in hazardous environments with limited power to speak up," he said. "It affirms that companies responding to disasters must prioritize worker safety."
Saket Soni, executive director of Resilience Force, an organization representing the workers, added that the lawsuit was about standing up for workers' rights. "We hope this outcome drives meaningful industry-wide change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies," he said.