"Shielding Migrant Rights: New York Lawmakers Push for Protections at Immigration Courthouses"
A new bill introduced by lawmakers from New York and California aims to curb mass arrests of migrants at federal immigration courthouses, where individuals are attending court proceedings as part of their immigration cases. The measure, known as the Immigration Due Process Protection Act, seeks to add a crucial layer of oversight to an increasingly contentious practice that has drawn widespread criticism.
Proponents argue that the sweeping arrests without judicial warrants unfairly penalize migrants who are exercising their right to due process and asylum. According to Rep. Dan Goldman, "over the past year, we have shockingly and repeatedly witnessed [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] and DHS officers detain non-violent, non-criminal immigrants immediately following mandatory court appearances β in many cases even while their case remains active and viable." The bill would bar such arrests unless there is an imminent threat to life or public safety.
Critics, however, argue that the proposal would hinder law enforcement's ability to enforce immigration laws. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin countered that allowing officers to make arrests at courthouses "is common sense," as it conserves resources and ensures officer safety.
A recent federal judge upheld a New York state law banning ICE arrests at state and local courthouses, dismissing a Trump administration lawsuit challenging the law. The bill's passage in Congress would require unlikely Republican backing to overcome the GOP-led House of Representatives' opposition.
The measure also restricts arrests at ICE check-ins, requiring written authorization from senior supervisors and reporting to the DHS inspector general within 30 days. Additionally, the legislation requires a report on DHS compliance with the restrictions from the inspector general.
A new bill introduced by lawmakers from New York and California aims to curb mass arrests of migrants at federal immigration courthouses, where individuals are attending court proceedings as part of their immigration cases. The measure, known as the Immigration Due Process Protection Act, seeks to add a crucial layer of oversight to an increasingly contentious practice that has drawn widespread criticism.
Proponents argue that the sweeping arrests without judicial warrants unfairly penalize migrants who are exercising their right to due process and asylum. According to Rep. Dan Goldman, "over the past year, we have shockingly and repeatedly witnessed [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] and DHS officers detain non-violent, non-criminal immigrants immediately following mandatory court appearances β in many cases even while their case remains active and viable." The bill would bar such arrests unless there is an imminent threat to life or public safety.
Critics, however, argue that the proposal would hinder law enforcement's ability to enforce immigration laws. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin countered that allowing officers to make arrests at courthouses "is common sense," as it conserves resources and ensures officer safety.
A recent federal judge upheld a New York state law banning ICE arrests at state and local courthouses, dismissing a Trump administration lawsuit challenging the law. The bill's passage in Congress would require unlikely Republican backing to overcome the GOP-led House of Representatives' opposition.
The measure also restricts arrests at ICE check-ins, requiring written authorization from senior supervisors and reporting to the DHS inspector general within 30 days. Additionally, the legislation requires a report on DHS compliance with the restrictions from the inspector general.