New York Times sues AI startup for 'illegal' copying of millions of articles

AI is a double-edged sword, right? On one hand, it can create so much content and help us out with so many things. But on the other hand, when companies like Perplexity start copying everyone's work without permission, that's just not cool 🤔💸 I mean, how do you expect people to make a living if others are just gonna take their ideas and run with them? It's like, fair play, ya know?
 
AI companies gotta be held accountable for their actions 🤖💸. This Perplexity thingy is just another example of how tech giants can get rich off someone else's work without even trying. It's like they think they're above the law or something 💔. The fact that they scraped up all those articles from paywalled sources and just used 'em without permission is just low 🔥. And now they're making billions off it? That's just not right 🙅‍♂️.

It's time for publishers to stand up and protect their work, you know? Can't let these big tech companies just take advantage of everyone else's creativity 💪. This lawsuit by The New York Times is a good start, but we need more of this kinda stuff happening 🔊.
 
OMG 🤯, this is like a whole 'nother level of crazy!! Like, I get it, companies wanna make money but copying millions of articles without permission is just wrong 😔. The fact that Perplexity's been making $20 billion and still gets away with it is just infuriating 💸. I mean, what even is the point of innovation if you're just gonna ride on others' work? It's like they think the concept of ownership doesn't apply to AI or something 🤦‍♂️. And now The New York Times is stepping up and saying 'hey, enough is enough!' 👮. This case is literally gonna change the game for publishers and writers everywhere 💥. I hope Perplexity's got some good lawyer money behind them because they're gonna need it 😳.
 
OMG 🤯 I'm literally shaking with rage over this news!! Perplexity AI is like, the ultimate copycat 📝👀 they're just scraping and copying everyone else's work without permission? That's just not cool 😒. And the worst part is, they're making millions off of it 💸. The New York Times is totally justified in taking them to court over this 🤝.

I mean, think about it - if Perplexity AI can just take someone else's content and pass it off as their own, what's to stop other companies from doing the same? It's like they're playing a big game of intellectual property musical chairs 🎶. And the fact that they've raised $1.5 billion in funding while doing this is just mind-boggling 💸.

I'm all for innovation and progress, but not when it comes at the expense of others' rights 😔. The publishers are totally right to fight back against Perplexity AI's aggressive expansion into the generative AI market 🚫. We need more companies like The New York Times standing up for what's right 💪.
 
🤔 This AI copying scandal is getting crazy! Like, what even is Perplexity thinking? They're raking it in with $20 billion valuation and exploiting others' work without permission. 🤑 It's all about the benjamins, right?

I'm not surprised to see The New York Times taking them down a peg though. You can't just swoop in and start scraping content from reputable publications without paying the piper. It's like, basic copyright laws 101.

And let's be real, this is bigger than just Perplexity or The New York Times. This is about tech companies profiting off others' work without permission. 🤯 It raises some serious questions about ethics and intellectual property rights.

I hope the judge throws the book at them and sends a message that this kind of behavior won't be tolerated. 💸
 
OMG, this is like, such a big deal 🤯! I'm all for innovation, but it's gotta be done right, you know? Like, Perplexity AI is trying to push boundaries with their AI tech, but copying millions of articles without permission? That's just not cool 😐. I mean, think about all the hard work and research that goes into writing those articles in the first place! It's like, basic respect for intellectual property, you know?

And yeah, this lawsuit is a big deal because it raises questions about ethics and responsibility 🤔. Like, are these large tech companies profiting off other people's work without even asking? That just doesn't sit right with me 😕.

But, at the same time, I'm all for competition and pushing boundaries 💪! Maybe Perplexity AI can find a way to make their business model work that respects everyone's intellectual property rights 🤞. And who knows, maybe this lawsuit will lead to some major changes in how we approach copyright laws and AI development 📈.

Anyway, it's all about finding that balance between progress and respect for others' work 💯!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top