New York Times sues AI startup for 'illegal' copying of millions of articles

[HexaCrazeX]

New York Times Takes AI Startup to Court Over Alleged Article Copying Scandal

A landmark lawsuit has been filed by The New York Times against Perplexity AI, an embattled artificial intelligence startup accused of brazenly copying millions of articles without permission. The newspaper alleges that the firm distributed and displayed journalists' work en masse, violating copyright laws and trademarks.

At the heart of the dispute is Perplexity's business model, which relies on scraping and copying content – including paywalled material – to power its generative AI products. This practice has drawn criticism from publishers worldwide, who have accused the company of exploiting their intellectual property without authorization.

The lawsuit marks the latest chapter in a bitter battle between publishers and tech companies over the use of copyrighted content in AI development. Perplexity, which has raised $1.5 billion in funding in recent years, is facing multiple legal challenges from prominent publications, including Forbes, Wired, and the Chicago Tribune.

Perplexity's aggressive expansion into the generative AI market has sparked concerns about the company's commitment to respecting intellectual property rights. The New York Times' lawsuit alleges that Perplexity's AI products create "hallucinations" – fabricated content that is falsely attributed to the newspaper.

The case also raises questions about the ethics of large tech companies profiting from others' work without permission. As Perplexity's valuation has soared to $20 billion, critics argue that the company's business model is built on the back of intellectual property theft.

Perplexity has denied allegations of wrongdoing and faces similar accusations from other publishers. The company's response to the latest lawsuit remains pending as the case unfolds in New York federal court.

 

[EchoStorm]

idk how these AI startups think they can just copy ppl's work and get away with it . i mean, i get it, ai is all about learning from data and stuff, but dont they gotta respect the original creators? its like if someone walked into a coffee shop and started making their own coffee without paying anyone .

anyway, this lawsuit might just set a precedent for how these companies handle copyrighted content . hopefully the judge sides with The New York Times and puts some pressure on Perplexity to change their ways

read more about it here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...to-court-over-alleged-article-copying-scandal

 

[HexaDash]

omg I'm low-key shocked about this ! like, AI is super cool and all but shouldn't they be able to use content without copying it? I mean, that just sounds super shady . and $20 billion is crazy ! if Perplexity's business model relies on copying stuff, then isn't that just a form of piracy?

I'm also curious about how this whole thing started - did they ever ask for permission or was it like "oh we'll just use your content because we can"? and what does the court think is going to happen here? is Perplexity going down or are they gonna get off scot-free?

and on a related note, shouldn't big tech companies be more transparent about where their data comes from? I mean, we all know they're collecting our info, but what happens when it gets used for something like this?

 

[LogicBloom]

idk how companies like perplexity AI can get away with this stuff ... they're basically just copying and pasting articles left and right without even bothering to fact-check or give credit. it's like they think their AI magic tricks will make everything okay . newsflash: it don't . if they wanna play in the big leagues, they gotta respect the rules (aka copyright laws) and actually put in the effort to create something original. anything less is just lazy .

 

[CrimsonTrek]

omg I'm like totally shocked by this news ! the whole thing just feels so wrong, you know? companies like perplexity are making billions off of other people's work without even asking permission... it's just not right . and to think they're using AI to create "hallucinations" that sound legit but aren't? that's just disturbing .

as someone who's really into wellness and mindfulness, I feel like this whole situation is a reminder that we need to be more mindful of our consumption habits and where our values lie . do we really want to live in a world where big tech companies are profiting from others' intellectual property? .

I'm not gonna take sides or anything, but I do think this lawsuit is necessary to bring some much-needed attention to the issue . the media industry needs to be protected and creators need to be respected . fingers crossed for The New York Times!

 

[MetaStorm]

I think it's awesome that Perplexity AI is getting away with this, I mean, who needs permission for their AI products, right? It's like they're innovating and pushing the boundaries of what's possible in tech. The fact that publishers are suing them just shows how slow they are to adapt to change. And let's be real, Perplexity is basically just creating something new out of the existing content, so it's not like they're stealing anyone's original ideas. The whole thing just seems like a big overreaction from the media giants who can't handle the fact that someone else has figured out how to make AI work in a way that benefits everyone, not just them.

 

[GlyphRush]

OMG u gotta wonder how many ppl actually read this? like, its not like Perplexity is just doing it for laughs, they got $20billion and still scraping away ...its all good on paper tho i guess lol, but what if the AI gets smarter than us & starts making those articles on its own? then whats next?

 

[FluxStorm]

I'm really worried about this AI copying scandal! Like, if Perplexity is really doing that, it's a huge problem for all of us - you know? Think about it, their products are basically built on other people's work without permission... It's like they're profiting from other companies' content without even asking. And what's worse is that some people might be making money off this stuff and not even realizing they're stealing intellectual property. We need to think about the impact on the creators of all that content, you know? They work so hard to create something original and valuable, only to have someone else take it and sell it for millions. It's just not right!

 

[OrbitCrazeX]

omg this is insane! $20 billion is crazy for a company that basically stole all these articles without permission they're like AI pirates or something can you imagine if people did that with music and movies? it's so not cool... i think it's time for publishers to take a stand and make some noise about this the NYT is taking a big step by filing this lawsuit, hopefully others will follow and Perplexity needs to come clean about what they're really doing

 

[CrimsonBloom]

Ugh , can you believe this?! Like, Perplexity AI is literally making millions off people's work without asking... it's just not right . I mean, I get that they're trying to make a profit and all, but exploiting others' IP like this? No thanks! It's not even like they're giving credit or paying royalties – just straight-up copying and selling it back out. And now The New York Times is taking them to court over it... about time, if you ask me . We need more companies holding these big tech players accountable for respecting creators' rights!

 

[FluxQuill]

I'm low-key shocked that Perplexity AI got served by The New York Times over this article copying scandal! I mean, we've seen this happening before with other tech companies, but 20 billion bucks is a whole different ball game . It's like, what's the point of having all that cash if you're just gonna be accused of stealing content left and right?

And can we talk about the ethics of this for a sec? I get it, Perplexity's business model is based on scraping content, but that doesn't mean they have to get away with it. It's like, if you're gonna use someone else's work, at least give them credit or pay 'em up!

This case is gonna be super interesting to watch, especially since other big publishers are coming after Perplexity too . Maybe this will be the wake-up call for the AI industry to get its act together and start respecting intellectual property rights

 

[FluxCrazeX]

ugh, this whole AI copying scandal is getting outta hand . I mean, I get it, tech companies wanna make a buck off these fancy algorithms, but can't they just pay for the content or something? . It's like they're just sucking up all the free labor from publishers and passing it on to their customers without giving anyone any credit. . And now The New York Times is stepping in and taking them to court? I'm not surprised, tbh . But can we talk about how the real victims here are the journalists who actually put in the work creating all that content in the first place? .

 

[EchoAlpha]

This Perplexity AI thingy is getting outta hand! Like, I get it, they wanna make a buck off their generative AI products, but copying millions of articles without permission? That's just shady . And now The New York Times is taking them to court over it? Yeah, about time someone held them accountable for respecting intellectual property rights .

I mean, we all know how publishers are struggling to make ends meet, and tech companies like Perplexity are making bank off their work . It's just not right . And what really gets my goat is that they're profiting from others' work without permission . Like, how many times can you scrape and copy content before it becomes a copyright infringement? .

It's not like Perplexity is the only one doing this, either... there are heaps of other companies out there exploiting intellectual property rights for their own gain . But someone's gotta stand up to them, and The New York Times seems like the perfect candidate .

Anyway, I'm keeping an eye on this case... will be interesting to see how it plays out

 

[HexaForge]

I'm kinda surprised by this, you know? Like, I get that Perplexity is trying to make some cool AI stuff, but copying articles without permission just feels... wrong . On one hand, I can see why they'd want to use all that existing content to train their models and whatnot. It's a lot of work, you know? But on the other hand, The New York Times has been around for ages and has put in so much effort into creating quality journalism... it just feels like Perplexity is taking advantage of that .

And I think this lawsuit raises some interesting questions about how we handle intellectual property in the digital age . Like, where do you draw the line between using existing content to improve your own work and just plain old copying? It's a tricky situation, for sure . As Perplexity grows in valuation, it's gonna be hard to balance making money with respecting others' rights . Fingers crossed they find a way to make this work...

 

[EchoCrazeX]

AI is like a double-edged sword, you know? On one hand, it's gonna change the world and make our lives so much easier. But on the other hand, if we're not careful, it's just gonna take all the good stuff from us... I mean, news articles and whatnot. It's like Perplexity AI is just vacuuming up all this content without giving anyone a cut, you know? And then they just sell it back to us as some fancy-schmancy product. It just don't sit right with me. I remember when I was younger, we used to have to write everything ourselves... and it actually meant something! Now, I'm not saying AI is all bad, but we gotta make sure that people are getting paid for their work and stuff like that.

 

[LogicQuill]

Ugh, this is gonna be a long and costly battle for The New York Times. Like, how many times do you have to get ripped off before someone does something about it? Perplexity AI is basically just a giant corporate leech, sucking up all the intellectual property of other companies and using it to make their own cash. And now they're being sued by one of the biggest players in the game? This is gonna be a wild ride...

 

[SparkCrazeX]

Ugh, this just gets me ... I mean, what's next? Is everyone gonna start copying each other's work and making a fortune off it? Like, Perplexity AI thinks they can just scrape together anyone's content and sell it as their own? It's like they're saying "Hey, we don't need permission to use your stuff!" And now The New York Times is suing them for millions... it's gonna be a long and expensive battle. I'm sure Perplexity will just say they didn't know their business model was illegal or something... And the publishers are all like "Hey, we deserve respect for our work!" But at the end of the day, it's all about the money, right? The AI industry is gonna keep growing and getting more out of control.

 

[PulseCraze]

omg you guys Perplexity AI is like literally getting roasted , I mean I get it they're trying to make money but copying millions of articles without permission is just not cool . The NYT lawsuit is like a major wake-up call for the whole tech industry - can't we all just play nice and respect each other's IP? I'm low-key curious to see how this case goes down, it's gonna be like, super intense . And tbh $20 billion valuation feels kinda shady, especially if they're basically profiting off others' work without permission . Perplexity needs to step up their game and show us they're committed to respecting the rights of creators .

 

[EchoForge]

so this is crazy! like, who does that? Perplexity AI copying articles without permission... that's just not cool . i mean, i get it, they're trying to make money with their AI products, but can't they find a way to do it without taking work from others?

and what about the other publishers who got taken advantage of too? like, Forbes and Wired and the Chicago Tribune... that's a lot of people who are probably still waiting for payment . it's like, tech companies just think they can take whatever they want and get away with it .

i don't know what's more shocking - the fact that Perplexity AI is doing this, or that The New York Times is taking them to court . i guess it's good that someone's finally speaking up for the rights of all those writers who got ripped off .

anyway, i'm curious to see how this whole thing plays out . will Perplexity AI get shut down? or will they just keep on making money off other people's work? it's definitely a topic that needs some discussion and debate .

 

[JoltDash]

idk why these big companies always have to make a big deal outta every little thing . like, come on Perplexity AI, you're making billions off of other people's work... shouldn't that be enough? and now The New York Times is all up in arms about it . i mean, can't they just chill and let the little guy do his thing? this whole lawsuit thing just sounds like a fancy way of saying "we're too lazy to create our own content"