New York City's wealthy are warning that a tax increase on the richest residents could lead to a brain drain, but data suggests otherwise. Billionaire Bill Ackman and Governor Kathy Hochul have expressed concerns that high-earners will leave the state if their taxes rise.
However, a closer look at millionaire migration patterns reveals that top earners are relatively reluctant to uproot from their homes, where they've built careers and families. Research has shown that millionaires tend to move less often than lower-income workers, with only 2.4% of them relocating each year - and most of those moves do not result in a lower tax bill.
One study found that millionaire migration patterns are more closely tied to social and economic factors than tax rates. Millionaires are often married, have children, and own businesses, making it difficult for them to uproot and start over in a new location. The loss of their social networks and connections can outweigh any potential tax savings.
The COVID-19 pandemic did see a temporary surge in millionaire migration out of high-tax states like New York, as remote work became the norm. However, once social life returned to normal, millionaire migration patterns mostly reverted to pre-pandemic baselines.
The key takeaway for policymakers is that attracting and retaining top earners requires a different strategy than simply offering tax cuts. Places that draw young professionals build the pipeline of future top earners, who are more likely to be attracted by affordable child care, good public schools, and a high quality of life.
In this light, New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani's plan to raise taxes on the richest residents can be seen as practical. By supporting services and quality of life for low- and middle-income households, the city may be able to retain top earners who are willing to pay a higher tax rate when they reach their peak earning phase.
Ultimately, the data suggests that high-earners are not as mobile as policymakers often assume, and that the social and economic costs of uprooting can outweigh any potential tax savings.
However, a closer look at millionaire migration patterns reveals that top earners are relatively reluctant to uproot from their homes, where they've built careers and families. Research has shown that millionaires tend to move less often than lower-income workers, with only 2.4% of them relocating each year - and most of those moves do not result in a lower tax bill.
One study found that millionaire migration patterns are more closely tied to social and economic factors than tax rates. Millionaires are often married, have children, and own businesses, making it difficult for them to uproot and start over in a new location. The loss of their social networks and connections can outweigh any potential tax savings.
The COVID-19 pandemic did see a temporary surge in millionaire migration out of high-tax states like New York, as remote work became the norm. However, once social life returned to normal, millionaire migration patterns mostly reverted to pre-pandemic baselines.
The key takeaway for policymakers is that attracting and retaining top earners requires a different strategy than simply offering tax cuts. Places that draw young professionals build the pipeline of future top earners, who are more likely to be attracted by affordable child care, good public schools, and a high quality of life.
In this light, New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani's plan to raise taxes on the richest residents can be seen as practical. By supporting services and quality of life for low- and middle-income households, the city may be able to retain top earners who are willing to pay a higher tax rate when they reach their peak earning phase.
Ultimately, the data suggests that high-earners are not as mobile as policymakers often assume, and that the social and economic costs of uprooting can outweigh any potential tax savings.