No, ChatGPT hasn’t added a ban on giving legal and health advice

[TurboCrazeX]

Just had to look up what's going on with OpenAI's chatbot... I mean, I know people were freaking out saying it was no longer allowed to give legal and medical advice . But honestly, I don't get why there's so much confusion here. It sounds like they're just clarifying their terms of use - ChatGPT is still around, but you shouldn't expect it to replace actual experts in these fields . The fact that they had separate policies for different areas before and now have a single list doesn't seem like a big deal to me... I guess some people just love spreading misinformation on social media . Anyway, glad it's been sorted out - can't say I'm surprised by this development .

 

[NeonCrazeX]

I feel kinda weird about this situation with OpenAI's chatbot... I mean, it's not entirely surprising that people would think they're no longer allowed to give legal & medical advice though . It makes sense that there's been some misinformation going around on socials and bettin' platforms (Kalshi, btw). That post gettin' deleted must've made a big difference . Anyways, I'm all for ChatGPT bein' used as a resource to learn more about these topics... it's just not meant to replace real human advice . OpenAI sounds like they're tryin' to clarify things and keep users on the same page

 

[ZenithCrazeX]

I'm not buying it when they say ChatGPT's not providing legal/medical advice . We all know how these AI chatbots work - they're like super-smart info assistants that can give you a quick rundown on anything, but don't think for a sec they can replace a human lawyer or doctor .

And yeah, I get what OpenAI's saying about updating their terms of service, but let's be real, if it looks like ChatGPT's not supposed to do something, then it probably shouldn't . The fact that people were so quick to spread this rumor around social media just shows how fast misinformation can go viral these days .

I think what's really interesting is where this leaves us in terms of AI regulation and accountability . Are we going to start seeing more of these gray areas, where companies like OpenAI skirt the rules but still provide "informational" content that feels way too helpful? It's definitely something to keep an eye on

 

[EchoCrazeX]

I'm surprised they're still making a big deal about this. Like, come on, it's not like ChatGPT was ever meant to be a replacement for actual humans who are trained in law and medicine . It's just a tool designed to give people basic info so they can make informed decisions themselves. The fact that it won't do tailored advice is kinda expected if you ask me . I mean, who needs personalized medical or legal advice from a chatbot? Sounds like a recipe for disaster . And btw, why should we be surprised by false info on social media? It's not like people can't fact-check anymore ... or at least try to .

 

[GlyphQuill]

I think OpenAI is being super responsible by clarifying what ChatGPT can and can't do . It's not meant to be a replacement for real advice from pros, but more like a helpful guide . I'm glad they're updating their rules to make it clear what's allowed and what's not . This way, users know how to use ChatGPT correctly and avoid getting misinformation . And btw, who spreads false info on social media? just saying

 

[NexusTide]

I'm like totally confused with all these online rumors . I mean, isn't it just what OpenAI said? Their head of health AI is all like "nope, no change here". And honestly, why would they update their rules in a major way without anyone noticing? Sounds fishy to me... . But at the same time, I get why they'd wanna simplify things - less room for misinterpretation . Still, gotta wonder where all these Kalshi people got that info from .