US Climate Talks in Brazil: A Historic Absence of High-Level Representatives
The Trump administration has confirmed that it will not send any high-level representatives to upcoming UN climate talks in Belém, Brazil. This decision underscores the administration's hostile stance towards action on the climate crisis and marks a significant escalation in its isolationist approach.
For decades, the US has participated in various forms of multilateral climate negotiations, including major summits like the Copenhagen Climate Summit and the Paris Agreement. However, under President Trump, the White House has abandoned this tradition, opting instead for unilateral deals with individual countries.
The decision to bypass the Belém talks is a further indication of the administration's skepticism towards global cooperation on climate change. Last year, President Trump called the crisis "a hoax" and "a con job," and the US withdrew from the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming.
Instead of participating in the talks, the US will be represented by a handful of governors, members of Congress, mayors, and activists who are advocating for climate action at the subnational level. However, these individuals have been told that they would not receive any support from the federal government, despite being encouraged to attend.
The absence of high-level American representation raises concerns about the administration's commitment to addressing the climate crisis. Todd Stern, a former US lead climate negotiator, warned that "the great majority of countries aren't going to pay attention" to the US stance on climate change, given its reputation for skepticism and denialism.
While some have expressed surprise at the decision, others welcome it as an opportunity for other countries to strike a stronger climate agreement without American interference. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democratic senator from Rhode Island, noted that the administration had even refused to provide embassy support for the US delegation, which is a standard courtesy for participating nations.
As the world grapples with the increasingly urgent threat of climate change, it remains to be seen whether the US will re-enter the Paris Agreement or adopt any meaningful domestic policies to address the crisis. One thing is clear: under President Trump, the US will not play a lead role in global efforts to combat climate change.
The Trump administration has confirmed that it will not send any high-level representatives to upcoming UN climate talks in Belém, Brazil. This decision underscores the administration's hostile stance towards action on the climate crisis and marks a significant escalation in its isolationist approach.
For decades, the US has participated in various forms of multilateral climate negotiations, including major summits like the Copenhagen Climate Summit and the Paris Agreement. However, under President Trump, the White House has abandoned this tradition, opting instead for unilateral deals with individual countries.
The decision to bypass the Belém talks is a further indication of the administration's skepticism towards global cooperation on climate change. Last year, President Trump called the crisis "a hoax" and "a con job," and the US withdrew from the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming.
Instead of participating in the talks, the US will be represented by a handful of governors, members of Congress, mayors, and activists who are advocating for climate action at the subnational level. However, these individuals have been told that they would not receive any support from the federal government, despite being encouraged to attend.
The absence of high-level American representation raises concerns about the administration's commitment to addressing the climate crisis. Todd Stern, a former US lead climate negotiator, warned that "the great majority of countries aren't going to pay attention" to the US stance on climate change, given its reputation for skepticism and denialism.
While some have expressed surprise at the decision, others welcome it as an opportunity for other countries to strike a stronger climate agreement without American interference. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democratic senator from Rhode Island, noted that the administration had even refused to provide embassy support for the US delegation, which is a standard courtesy for participating nations.
As the world grapples with the increasingly urgent threat of climate change, it remains to be seen whether the US will re-enter the Paris Agreement or adopt any meaningful domestic policies to address the crisis. One thing is clear: under President Trump, the US will not play a lead role in global efforts to combat climate change.