Ocean City's Planning Board Hands Down Rejection on Hotel Project Proposal for Wonderland Pier Site
The Ocean City Planning Board has rejected a measure to pave the way for a luxury hotel project at the former Gillian's Wonderland Pier site, dealing another setback to plans that have been stalled since 2021. The proposed 252-room hotel would be constructed on the north end of the boardwalk, but current zoning restrictions prohibit new hotel construction in the area.
Icona Resorts CEO Eustace Mita had lobbied for a rezoning designation at the site, which he claimed was necessary to revitalize the property and make it more suitable for future development. However, after hearing from various stakeholders, including city officials, residents, business owners, and even his own team, the planning board voted 4-4 on whether the site qualified as an area in need of rehabilitation.
Despite this non-binding decision, Ocean City Council Vice President Pete Madden indicated that the board's recommendation would likely be disregarded. "We went to the planning board like we would call an attorney for advice," he said. "That doesn't mean we have to follow it." Instead, city council will continue to grapple with the issue at its next meeting on January 22.
Madden argued that designating the property as a rehabilitation zone would allow both the owner and the city to negotiate a mutually beneficial agreement, rather than relying on a series of separate zoning variances. However, some residents, including Bill Merritt from Ocean City 2050, expressed skepticism about the planning board's decision, citing concerns over the adequacy of evidence.
With the latest development, the fate of Wonderland Pier remains uncertain, and its future as an amusement park or another use remains up in the air. Icona Resorts' CEO Eustace Mita has stated that he will sell the property if his hotel plans are rejected, but new owners would still need to obtain a rezoning designation to pursue any alternative uses.
As the city council continues to navigate this complex issue, it appears that the status quo may persist for now, with further delays and discussions likely to ensue.
The Ocean City Planning Board has rejected a measure to pave the way for a luxury hotel project at the former Gillian's Wonderland Pier site, dealing another setback to plans that have been stalled since 2021. The proposed 252-room hotel would be constructed on the north end of the boardwalk, but current zoning restrictions prohibit new hotel construction in the area.
Icona Resorts CEO Eustace Mita had lobbied for a rezoning designation at the site, which he claimed was necessary to revitalize the property and make it more suitable for future development. However, after hearing from various stakeholders, including city officials, residents, business owners, and even his own team, the planning board voted 4-4 on whether the site qualified as an area in need of rehabilitation.
Despite this non-binding decision, Ocean City Council Vice President Pete Madden indicated that the board's recommendation would likely be disregarded. "We went to the planning board like we would call an attorney for advice," he said. "That doesn't mean we have to follow it." Instead, city council will continue to grapple with the issue at its next meeting on January 22.
Madden argued that designating the property as a rehabilitation zone would allow both the owner and the city to negotiate a mutually beneficial agreement, rather than relying on a series of separate zoning variances. However, some residents, including Bill Merritt from Ocean City 2050, expressed skepticism about the planning board's decision, citing concerns over the adequacy of evidence.
With the latest development, the fate of Wonderland Pier remains uncertain, and its future as an amusement park or another use remains up in the air. Icona Resorts' CEO Eustace Mita has stated that he will sell the property if his hotel plans are rejected, but new owners would still need to obtain a rezoning designation to pursue any alternative uses.
As the city council continues to navigate this complex issue, it appears that the status quo may persist for now, with further delays and discussions likely to ensue.