Detroit's Neighborhoods Face Off: Affordable Housing and the Battle for Community Character.
As Detroit continues to grow after decades of population loss, a new wave of change is sweeping across its neighborhoods. The city's long-vacant buildings and lots are being transformed into vibrant spaces that offer quality housing options for residents. However, this growth has not gone unnoticed, and two neighbors in Boston-Edison are leading the charge against a proposed affordable housing development.
The project at 9851 Hamilton Avenue involves the conversion of a vacant office building into 49 apartments. While proponents argue that it will provide much-needed housing, two residents have stepped forward to express their opposition. Kyle Scannell and Carole Hall claim that the development would be detrimental to the neighborhood, citing concerns about parking availability, blight, and crime.
Scannell's decision not to purchase a home adjacent to the vacant lot has led him to sue the city, claiming he will suffer irreparable financial harm from the project. His lawsuit raises questions about his own due diligence in purchasing a property in an established R5 residential zone, which explicitly allows for apartment dwellings.
Hall, on the other hand, dismisses the need for additional housing in the North End, pointing to her own privilege as a long-time resident who has never had to search for affordable housing. Her argument that these developments amount to a "transfer of generational wealth" from nearby residents to developers rings hollow, particularly when considering the benefits of increased tax revenue and a larger population base.
The author of the article counters Hall's claims by highlighting the struggles of searching for affordable housing in Detroit. They argue that the development is necessary to sustain the city's growth and ensure that all residents can thrive. Ignoring narrow-minded objections from wealthy homeowners would require a commitment to creating a more inclusive and vibrant community.
As Detroit continues to evolve, it's essential to strike a balance between preserving neighborhood character and embracing growth. The proposed affordable housing development serves as a model for how communities can work together to address the city's housing needs. It's time to put aside obstructionist tactics and focus on building a stronger, more resilient Detroit for all residents.
As Detroit continues to grow after decades of population loss, a new wave of change is sweeping across its neighborhoods. The city's long-vacant buildings and lots are being transformed into vibrant spaces that offer quality housing options for residents. However, this growth has not gone unnoticed, and two neighbors in Boston-Edison are leading the charge against a proposed affordable housing development.
The project at 9851 Hamilton Avenue involves the conversion of a vacant office building into 49 apartments. While proponents argue that it will provide much-needed housing, two residents have stepped forward to express their opposition. Kyle Scannell and Carole Hall claim that the development would be detrimental to the neighborhood, citing concerns about parking availability, blight, and crime.
Scannell's decision not to purchase a home adjacent to the vacant lot has led him to sue the city, claiming he will suffer irreparable financial harm from the project. His lawsuit raises questions about his own due diligence in purchasing a property in an established R5 residential zone, which explicitly allows for apartment dwellings.
Hall, on the other hand, dismisses the need for additional housing in the North End, pointing to her own privilege as a long-time resident who has never had to search for affordable housing. Her argument that these developments amount to a "transfer of generational wealth" from nearby residents to developers rings hollow, particularly when considering the benefits of increased tax revenue and a larger population base.
The author of the article counters Hall's claims by highlighting the struggles of searching for affordable housing in Detroit. They argue that the development is necessary to sustain the city's growth and ensure that all residents can thrive. Ignoring narrow-minded objections from wealthy homeowners would require a commitment to creating a more inclusive and vibrant community.
As Detroit continues to evolve, it's essential to strike a balance between preserving neighborhood character and embracing growth. The proposed affordable housing development serves as a model for how communities can work together to address the city's housing needs. It's time to put aside obstructionist tactics and focus on building a stronger, more resilient Detroit for all residents.
. The thing is, Boston-Edison has been working hard to revitalize its community, and affordable housing can be a great way to do that 
. I'm not saying it's all sunshine and rainbows - there are definitely some risks involved with any new development. But if we're really talking about making progress here, we need to start thinking about the bigger picture 
.
. I get that she's a long-time resident who's never had to worry about affordable housing, but that doesn't mean her opinion isn't valid too 
. It's just that sometimes we need to listen to perspectives that might be outside our own bubble 
.
?
.
. And these two neighbors just seem to be looking out for themselves 
. I mean, if they bought their homes already, why are they complaining about something that's gonna benefit other people? It doesn't make sense to me 
. We need to stop being selfish and think about the bigger picture 
.
people need affordable housing options and they dont wanna see this development happen 
and this development could be a step in the right direction... maybe they can work out some compromises? like extra parking spots or community spaces? something to make it win-win for everyone 
... I get it, change can be hard but come on! We need more options for people who want to live in Detroit and this development could bring some real benefits. Like increased tax revenue and all that jazz 
... Anyway, I think we should focus on building a stronger Detroit for everyone, not just the wealthy homeowners who are already set 
I get it, change can be scary, but holding up an entire neighborhood's development because of your own financial concerns? That's not how we build a stronger community. On the other hand, I totally get where Carole Hall is coming from - affordable housing should never come at the cost of displacement and disruption to existing residents' lives. We need more people like her who are willing to have tough conversations about gentrification. 
.
I wonder if they've actually looked at the numbers for that housing development... maybe there's a way to make it work for everyone 
And let's be real, who can't afford housing in Detroit right now? It feels like they're choosing between two extremes: a bunch of soulless apartments or no affordable options at all. The city needs to find that sweet spot where growth happens without sacrificing what makes these neighborhoods special. 
I mean, he knew the zone was an R5 area when he bought his place, right? And Carole Hall's point about not needing more housing in the North End is a legit one...I've been trying to find affordable housing for my own siblings and it's SO hard 
. I think the city should consider like, community input and all that before making decisions on developments. We need to make sure everyone's voice is heard, not just the wealthy ones who can afford to move out if they don't like something 
. But at the same time, we gotta make progress and give people a place to live...I guess it's a tough spot to be in 
.
. I mean, think about it, affordable housing is literally a matter of life and death for so many people struggling to make ends meet in this city. And yeah, sure, we get that Kyle Scannell's property values might take a hit from the development, but let's be real, he should've done his due diligence before buying in an R5 zone 
.
. That sounds like a total cop-out to me. If he's so concerned about his property values, maybe he should've bought in a different neighborhood or waited until the development is done 
.
.