'People keep reinventing the same damn movie': cinematographer Roger Deakins on 50 years behind the camera and his fears for film's future

Roger Deakins, the 50-year veteran cinematographer behind some of the most visually stunning films in recent history, is struggling to define his craft. When asked what he does, he exclaims, "Argh!" - a sentiment echoed by many in the film industry as they try to articulate their profession.

For Deakins, cinematography is not just about capturing images, but about telling a visual story that complements the narrative. He collaborates closely with directors and other departments to bring his vision to life, often working under tight deadlines and with limited resources.

Deakins's own journey into film was circuitous, starting as a still photographer before transitioning to cinematography. His early work on documentaries and music videos honed his skills and gave him the confidence he needed to take on bigger projects.

He values specificity and intentionality in his craft, preferring to strip down scenes to their bare essentials rather than relying on flashy camera movements or excessive lighting. This approach is reflected in his work on films like Martin Scorsese's Kundun and Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049.

However, as the film industry continues to evolve, Deakins is concerned that cinematography may become a lost art. The rise of digital technology has made it easier to manipulate images and create elaborate effects, but he believes this can lead to a lack of subtlety and nuance in storytelling.

"I don't want to experience 24 weeks on a volume with a virtual reality background," Deakins says, highlighting his preference for practical filmmaking techniques. He also critiques the proliferation of big-budget action films that rely heavily on green screens and CGI, believing they detract from more meaningful storytelling.

Despite these concerns, Deakins remains committed to mentoring the next generation of cinematographers through his Team Deakins podcast and website. Alongside his wife James Ellis Deakins, he aims to demystify the film industry and provide a platform for aspiring filmmakers to share their work and learn from each other.

As Deakins reflects on his own career, he emphasizes the importance of finding passion and love in one's work. "Isn't that just life?" he says, recalling a conversation with a farmer who found joy in his stone wall-building work. This sense of purpose is something Deakins believes is essential for anyone pursuing a creative profession.

Deakins's latest book, Reflections: On Cinematography, offers a unique glimpse into the world of cinematography and provides insight into his own process and philosophies. While he acknowledges that the film industry is changing, he remains optimistic about the future and encourages aspiring filmmakers to stay true to their artistic vision.
 
πŸ˜” I feel you, Deakins... capturing the perfect shot can be so frustrating when it feels like nobody understands what we do 🀯 It's not just about pointing a camera and clicking a button, it's about telling a story through images that makes people feel something πŸ’­ And yeah, with all the tech advancements, it can be tempting to go overboard with fancy effects... but sometimes less is more, you know? πŸ™ I think what Deakins is trying to say is that there's value in stripping down scenes and focusing on the essence of the story rather than getting caught up in flashy stuff πŸ’‘ And I love how he emphasizes the importance of finding passion and purpose in your work... it's so true! 🌈
 
I feel like Deakins is totally on point πŸ™Œ. I mean, in an era where everything can be easily edited and manipulated digitally, it's refreshing to see someone who values the raw, authentic feel of film over fancy effects. His approach is all about stripping away the noise and getting back to what really matters - telling a story that resonates with people. And he's not afraid to speak up about his concerns, which shows he's got heart πŸ’–. It's awesome that he's using his platform to mentor the next gen of cinematographers and promote a more thoughtful approach to filmmaking πŸŽ₯πŸ’‘.
 
you know what's wild? we spend so much time trying to capture life in all its beauty, but sometimes I think we forget the real magic happens when we strip it down to the bare essentials... like deakins said, specificity and intentionality are key to telling a true story. all this digital tech and CGI stuff is cool and all, but at the end of the day, can it really capture the human experience? πŸ€” I'm not saying it's better, just that we need to be careful not to lose ourselves in the noise...
 
ugh, can you believe this? Roger Deakins is stressing out because people in the film industry are having trouble explaining what they do 🀯. Like, come on guys, it's cinematography! You shoot stuff! It's not that hard. I mean, I know he's been doing it for like 50 years and all, but still... the man's trying to warn us about something called "lost art" because of digital technology πŸ“Ί. Newsflash: just 'cause you can do fancy effects on a computer doesn't mean you're creating substance. I'm not saying Deakins is wrong or anything, but maybe he should chill out and recognize that there's still room for traditional techniques in this industry πŸ”.
 
i think its crazy how much cinematography has evolved but some people might forget what makes a movie actually look good lol πŸ€”. deakins is all about stripping things down to basics and letting the story breathe, whereas i feel like some of these new films are all about flashy effects and forgetting that the actual acting and plot should be the focus 😐. anyway, its awesome that he's trying to mentor the next gen and share his knowledge, because at the end of the day, film is all about telling a story and bringing it to life πŸŽ₯
 
Man, I feel you Deakins 🀯. I mean, have you seen some of these movies lately? They're all about the fancy visuals and not enough substance πŸ“Ί. I get it, cinematography is a crucial part of filmmaking, but when it becomes all about the flash and dash, that's when things start to go wrong 🚨.

I love how Deakins talks about stripping scenes down to their bare essentials. That's like music to my ears 😊. And yeah, digital tech has made it easier to manipulate images, but sometimes I think that's exactly what's wrong with modern filmmaking - the lack of authenticity and heart ❀️.

But hey, Deakins is all about demystifying the film industry and encouraging new blood 🀩. That's something we should all be behind. And let's be real, who doesn't love a good practical film technique? πŸŽ₯

I'm also curious to check out his book Reflections: On Cinematography. Maybe it'll give me some inspiration for my own creative projects πŸ“š.

Anyway, I think Deakins is onto something with his concerns about the state of cinematography. It's all well and good to have fancy visuals, but at the end of the day, it's gotta mean something πŸ’”.
 
πŸŽ₯ I feel like Deakins is talking straight to my soul πŸ˜‚. The way he emphasizes the importance of finding passion in your work is so relatable. As someone who's always been a productivity enthusiast, I can attest that when you love what you do, it doesn't even feel like work πŸ™Œ. The film industry is definitely changing and it's hard to keep up with the latest tech advancements πŸ€–, but Deakins's approach to cinematography makes me want to go back to basics and focus on telling a great visual story rather than just relying on fancy effects πŸ”₯. I'm totally gonna check out his podcast and book now! πŸ’»
 
I think this is kinda weird 😊, all these big-name filmmakers struggling to explain what they do? I mean, cinematography's not rocket science, right? You just capture images on film πŸ“Έ. But I guess it's more about telling a story and working with the director and crew to bring that vision to life.

I love Deakins's approach to filmmaking though - stripping scenes down to the bare essentials, no fancy camera movements or excessive lighting. It's all about subtlety and nuance πŸŽ₯. And I'm totally with him on practical filmmaking techniques over green screens and CGI - it's just more authentic, you know? πŸ’‘

But what really gets me is how Deakins wants to mentor the next gen of cinematographers through his podcast and website. That's so cool! We need more people sharing their passion and expertise in the film industry 🎬. And I'm loving that he's staying true to himself, even as the industry changes. That's the key to happiness, right?
 
deakins gets a bad rap for being too traditional πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I think his approach to cinematography is still totally relevant in today's world, especially with all these blockbuster films relying on CGI πŸ’Έ it's cool that he's sticking to what he knows and loves about the craft. plus, someone's gotta keep the old-school filmmaking techniques alive πŸ”₯ and let's be real, those virtual reality backgrounds are straight up weird 🀯
 
I think its pretty cool that Roger Deakins is still passionate about preserving the art of cinematography despite all the new tech coming out πŸ“ΈπŸ”₯. He's right though, with all the CGI and green screens, some films can end up feeling super shallow. I've seen some movies lately where the "wow" factor was just a bunch of fancy effects, but you couldn't really feel anything 😐.

For me, good cinematography is about creating mood and atmosphere, not just throwing a ton of flashy stuff at the screen πŸŒ™πŸ’«. Deakins's approach to stripping down scenes to their bare essentials makes so much sense – I've seen some of his work on Martin Scorsese's films, and it's like you can feel the story unfolding right in front of you πŸŽ₯.

I love that he's also focused on mentoring the next gen of cinematographers – its super important for us as a community to keep pushing each other to create something more meaningful πŸ’–.
 
I feel like I'm stuck in a loop with my assignments lately 🀯. We just started learning about cinematography in film class and it's blowing my mind! I mean, can you imagine being able to shape the entire mood of a scene just by adjusting your camera settings? πŸ“Έ It's like, totally cool... but also kinda overwhelming at the same time.

I think what really gets me is how much emphasis is put on the technical aspects of filmmaking. Don't get me wrong, I love learning about lenses and lighting setups and all that jazz πŸŽ₯, but sometimes I feel like we're missing out on the bigger picture. Like, what's the story trying to tell? What emotions are we trying to evoke?

I'm also kinda worried about what Deakins said in this article - that digital technology might make cinematography seem less 'real' or something πŸ€–. I mean, I love a good CGI effect as much as the next person, but isn't there a time and place for practical filmmaking too? It's like when we're shooting a scene on set and they keep telling us to 'use our heads'... but what if that's exactly what we need to do?! 🀯
 
Back
Top