USDA Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Fast-Tracked SNAP Work Requirements
A group of New York residents who rely on food stamps are taking the Trump administration to court, claiming that fast-tracked changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will unfairly strip thousands of people of their monthly benefits. The lawsuit, filed in New York federal court, aims to halt the implementation of the new work requirements and give recipients more time to adjust.
The plaintiffs, who include a SNAP recipient and a nonprofit organization that helps residents navigate food benefits, argue that the changes were rushed through without proper consideration for the practicalities. They claim that allowing able-bodied individuals to lose their benefits by March is unrealistic, given the limited job opportunities in New York City.
The lawsuit points out that Congress passed a law requiring states to implement work requirements earlier than initially intended, and that this new rule does not provide sufficient time for cities like New York to prepare. The average SNAP benefit in New York totals around $209 per person each month β an amount deemed "lifelines" by advocates who argue that these benefits are essential for low-income families.
With the federal shutdown looming, the Trump administration has announced plans to stop paying all SNAP benefits as soon as it continues, unless Congress passes a new spending bill. This move would leave thousands of New Yorkers without their monthly food aid. The plaintiffs hope that the court will block this plan and grant them more time to adjust to the new rules.
The lawsuit marks the latest challenge from SNAP recipients to the Trump administration's efforts to overhaul the program. As the implementation deadline approaches, advocates are growing increasingly concerned about the impact on vulnerable populations who rely on these benefits for their basic needs.
A group of New York residents who rely on food stamps are taking the Trump administration to court, claiming that fast-tracked changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will unfairly strip thousands of people of their monthly benefits. The lawsuit, filed in New York federal court, aims to halt the implementation of the new work requirements and give recipients more time to adjust.
The plaintiffs, who include a SNAP recipient and a nonprofit organization that helps residents navigate food benefits, argue that the changes were rushed through without proper consideration for the practicalities. They claim that allowing able-bodied individuals to lose their benefits by March is unrealistic, given the limited job opportunities in New York City.
The lawsuit points out that Congress passed a law requiring states to implement work requirements earlier than initially intended, and that this new rule does not provide sufficient time for cities like New York to prepare. The average SNAP benefit in New York totals around $209 per person each month β an amount deemed "lifelines" by advocates who argue that these benefits are essential for low-income families.
With the federal shutdown looming, the Trump administration has announced plans to stop paying all SNAP benefits as soon as it continues, unless Congress passes a new spending bill. This move would leave thousands of New Yorkers without their monthly food aid. The plaintiffs hope that the court will block this plan and grant them more time to adjust to the new rules.
The lawsuit marks the latest challenge from SNAP recipients to the Trump administration's efforts to overhaul the program. As the implementation deadline approaches, advocates are growing increasingly concerned about the impact on vulnerable populations who rely on these benefits for their basic needs.