Starmer's 'keep calm' Trump diplomacy bets on influence over popularity

Keir Starmer's strategy for dealing with Donald Trump has come under intense scrutiny after the US president launched a scathing attack on the UK's Chagos deal and posted an image depicting him meeting European leaders.

Starmer, who has been working closely with Powell - Tony Blair's former chief of staff, now Keir Starmer's national security adviser – is determined to find a "pragmatic, sensible and sustained" route through the latest crisis. He prefers calm discussion over gesture politics that could damage the relationship.

However, within 24 hours of his measured address, Trump had set off another diplomatic bomb by launching a broadside against the UK's Chagos deal, which he had previously warmly endorsed.

Starmer's strategy - dubbed "keep calm and carry on" - is already being called into question by some political opponents who see it as a passive approach that fails to address differences directly. Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, has described Trump as a bully and an international gangster, suggesting that the only way to deal with him is to stand up to him.

Privately, some inside the ruling Labour party agree that Starmer's approach needs to be re-evaluated. However, his cabinet ministers have rallied behind him, saying that private diplomacy has worked on issues like tariffs and Ukraine.

One cabinet minister noted that while Trump's behavior is unpredictable, the UK government needs to get behind Starmer and see how this situation unfolds. Another said that if Trump gets even more volatile, the UK will need to reassess its relationship with him.

Despite the chaos caused by Trump, some senior figures in his administration are trying to smooth over US-UK relations. The US House speaker told the UK parliament he had spoken "at length" to the president and was there to calm the waters.

It remains to be seen how Starmer's strategy will play out, but for now, it appears that love is in the air at 10 Downing Street - with the US commerce secretary telling the UK finance minister "We love you. We do."
 
πŸ€” Trump's actions are getting wilder by the minute. I mean, what's next? Starmer's "keep calm and carry on" strategy might be a bit passive, but it's better than letting diplomacy go up in flames every time Trump loses his temper. The UK can't control how much he blusters, but they can control their response to it. Maybe instead of trying to out-agitate him, we should focus on building bridges with people who actually want to work together? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” I think Starmer's approach is kinda sensible, but also a bit... passive? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I mean, Trump's behavior is all over the place and it's hard to predict what he'll do next. But at the same time, if we just keep calm and carry on, maybe that'll just fuel his ego even more? πŸ˜’

I think we need a mix of both: being calm and composed, but also willing to stand up for our interests when needed. Ed Davey's right, Trump is a bully and we can't just roll over every time he gets angry. πŸ’ͺ But at the same time, private diplomacy has worked in some areas, like tariffs and Ukraine, so maybe we should keep trying that too? 🀝

It's also a bit weird that everyone's suddenly "loving" each other again... πŸ˜‚ I mean, Trump's not exactly known for his love of kindness and respect for others. Maybe we're just setting ourselves up for disappointment if we think this will magically fix everything? πŸ€”
 
I don't know what's more cringeworthy... Trump's latest attack on the Chagos deal or Starmer's attempt to keep calm and carry on πŸ™„. It feels like he's just playing defense, but not really engaging with Trump's aggressive behavior. I mean, come on, if you're going to meet with European leaders, at least post a decent pic πŸ“Έ. And what's with the commerce secretary's sappy declaration of love? Is this some kind of awkward diplomatic icebreaker or just a weird attempt to smooth things over πŸ˜‚. Anyway, it's clear that Starmer's strategy needs to be re-evaluated if they want to have any real impact on the situation...
 
So they're saying Keir Starmer's trying to stay calm and not mess things up with Trump, but others think he should just tell him off πŸ˜’. I get it, though - what if Trump just gets more upset? πŸ€” It's like when my brother gets mad at me for borrowing his favorite video game... he doesn't always listen till I explain it to him again πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. Is it too much to expect some kind of middle ground here? Maybe the US commerce secretary was just being nice, but also a bit weird πŸ˜‚.
 
omg can u believe trump's latest move? 🀯 starmer's trying to stay calm & diplomatic, but i think ed davey's got a point - sometimes u gotta stand up 2 him & show he won't bully u around πŸ˜’ still, i hope starmer's strategy pays off & they can find a way 2 work w/ trump without it all falling apart πŸ’” meanwhile, i'm low-key loving the 'we love you' vibes from the us commerce sec πŸ˜‰
 
I'm not sure about Starmer's approach, tbh πŸ€”. I mean, Trump's behavior is wild and unpredictable, but calm discussion doesn't always work, right? I've seen some of his tweets, and they're just straight-up nasty πŸ˜’. Maybe it's time for the UK to take a more firm stance with him. Still, I can see why Starmer wants to keep calm and carry on - it's not like we want to escalate things, especially when there are bigger issues at stake πŸ™. But if Trump keeps going off the rails, we need to reassess our relationship with him, you know? πŸ’β€β™€οΈ
 
omg can u believe trump's latest move? 🀯 i mean i get starmer's calm approach is all well and good but come on, someone needs to call trump out for his behaviour! πŸ™„ ed davey's right in saying he's a bully... like what even is the point of having foreign leaders if u just gonna attack them over instagram?! πŸ˜‚

anyway back to starmer... i think his strategy might be working but we need to keep an eye on it. the fact that trump's advisors are trying to smooth things over in private diplomacy shows they know there's a problem. and honestly, 10 downing street does seem pretty cheerful about the whole thing... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ love u trump commerce secretary tho lol!
 
omg can't believe trump is being so extra about the chagos deal 🀯 like what's next? starmer needs to rethink his strategy, calm discussion isn't cutting it if trump is gonna keep throwing punches πŸ₯Š ed davey's right though, we need to stand up for ourselves and not let trump bully us around πŸ’ͺ on the other hand, private diplomacy with the commerce secretary is a good move, let's see how that plays out 🀞
 
I'm not sure I agree with Keir Starmer's approach to dealing with Trump... πŸ€” I think going head-to-head might be a better idea than just keeping calm and carrying on. I mean, Trump can be super volatile and unpredictable, it's hard to know what he'll say next! 😬 My problem is that if we don't stand up for ourselves, no one will. And yeah, maybe it sounds aggressive, but at least it shows we're not afraid of him... πŸ’β€β™‚οΈ
 
omg i'm low-key worried about keir starmer's approach to trump πŸ€”... like, i get it, 'keep calm and carry on' is a classic british thing but does it really work in today's world of social media drama? πŸ™„ Trump's always been unpredictable and now that he's taken out a broadside against the chagos deal, starmer needs to be more proactive 😬... maybe a mix of diplomacy and boldness would be better? πŸ’‘ what do you guys think? πŸ‘€
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this "keep calm and carry on" approach from Starmer... It seems like a bit too chill considering Trump's history of clashing with world leaders πŸ˜’. I get that it's all about maintaining good relations, but surely we can't just roll over whenever he gets upset? On one hand, private diplomacy has worked before (like with the tariffs and Ukraine issues), so maybe it'll pay off this time too 🀞. But at the same time, we gotta consider our own interests and values... like if we're going to support a deal that's basically sold out to US corporations πŸ€‘. I'm all for finding a pragmatic solution, but Starmer needs to strike a balance between being diplomatic and standing up for what matters πŸ’ͺ.
 
I don't get why anyone's still surprised by Trump's antics 🀯. The dude's got a reputation for being reckless and impulsive, so it's not like Starmer didn't know what he was getting himself into πŸ˜’. I mean, come on, "keep calm and carry on" is a pretty clear strategy if you ask me... or at least that's what the posters say πŸ€ͺ. Seriously though, it's just politics as usual - everyone's trying to navigate their way through the chaos without getting burned πŸ’Έ. Starmer's got some solid advisors like Powell guiding him, so I think he'll find a way to keep things under control βš–οΈ. But honestly, can we please just have a straightforward conversation about trade or something instead of all this back-and-forth nonsense πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ?
 
πŸ€” I gotta say, Keir Starmer's approach seems a bit too chill for me πŸ™ƒ. Trump's been going on and on about the Chagos deal and he just kinda... shrugs it off? Like, what's next? Will we just sit back and let him do whatever he wants? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I know some people think private diplomacy is the way to go, but sometimes you gotta stand up for yourself, you know? πŸ˜‚ Even if it means ruffling a few feathers. It's all about finding that balance between being friendly and being firm, right? πŸ’ͺ Maybe Starmer needs to rethink his strategy and come out swinging (but not too hard lol) πŸ˜‰
 
😊 The art of politics can be a delicate dance, and sometimes it takes time to find the right step to take πŸ•Ί. As Nelson Mandela once said, "The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." Let's see how Keir Starmer will navigate this diplomatic minefield πŸ’₯.
 
I think Starmer's "keep calm and carry on" approach might be a bit too passive, you know? πŸ€” I mean, Trump's been going around like a loose cannon for years now and it's starting to take its toll. Ed Davey's right, we can't just sit back and let him bully us into submission. We need to find a way to stand up to him without alienating the US altogether. Maybe it's time to get more involved in those diplomatic talks and not just rely on Powell to smooth things over? πŸš£β€β™€οΈ

It's funny, though - love at 10 Downing Street is definitely cute 😊, but let's not forget that we're talking about a guy who's got a history of backing out of deals and causing international chaos. We need to make sure our leaders are being realistic about the situation here.

I'm curious to see how this all plays out - will Starmer's strategy work, or do we need to take a more firm stance? 🀞 One thing's for sure, though: we can't afford to be caught off guard by Trump's antics anymore. We need to be prepared for anything! πŸ’ͺ
 
omg, what's going on with this whole Trump situation?! 🀯 I mean, one day he's all calm and friendly, next day he's just trashing the Chagos deal like it's nothing πŸ˜’. I don't get why Starmer is being so chill about it, doesn't he think they should just call him out for his bull? πŸ™„ I know some people are saying his strategy is kinda refreshing after all the dramatic politics around here, but I'm still not convinced. Shouldn't they be like "Hey, Trump, calm down and behave?" πŸ˜‚
 
lolol what a mess... Keir Starmer needs to take a deep breath 🀯 and shake things up ASAP πŸ’₯ I mean, "keep calm and carry on" just isn't cutting it anymore πŸ˜‚ we need some real leadership here πŸ™Œ not just a bunch of wishy-washy diplomacy πŸ•°οΈ I'm all for private diplomacy too, but sometimes you gotta call Trump out for what he is - a bully 🀬 not some gangster to be appeased with empty words πŸ’”
 
omg what's going on w/ keir starmer he's like so calm & collected but trump just keeps goin off the rails i feel like they're playing a game of diplomatic chess & starmer is just trying to keep his cool πŸ€” meanwhile ed davey is all "stand up 2 him" lol but let's be real, that's easier said than done πŸ™ƒ i'm curious tho, w/ trump being so unpredictable, will starmer's strategy of calm discussion actually work or is it just a recipe for disaster? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
man i'm low-key worried about starmer's approach to trump πŸ€” he's trying to keep calm and carry on but like, we can't just sit back and let trump bully us around πŸ˜‚ meanwhile ed davey is all "stand up to him" and i'm over here thinking same but how do you even do that with someone as unpredictable as trump? πŸ’₯ the lib Dems are right tho, we need to be direct and firm but at the same time we can't afford to rock the boat too much or risk getting burned πŸ”₯ anyway, it's all about damage control now i guess πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
 
Back
Top