Lithium levels in drinking water may be linked to an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children, but experts caution that the association does not necessarily imply a direct causal link.
According to a new study published in JAMA Pediatrics, pregnant women who live in areas with higher levels of lithium in their tap water are more likely to give birth to children with ASD. The research found that as lithium levels in water increased, so did the risk of an ASD diagnosis. Specifically, women exposed to the second-highest level of lithium had a 24% to 26% higher risk of giving birth to a child with ASD, while those exposed to the highest level had a 46% higher risk.
However, the study's lead author notes that the research cannot show a direct link between lithium exposure and an autism diagnosis. "Any drinking water contaminants that may affect the developing human brain deserve intense scrutiny," Dr. Beate Ritz said in a news release.
Experts say that further study is needed to understand the potential relationship between lithium levels in drinking water and ASD. The implications of this finding are complex, particularly when it comes to public health policy. On one hand, lithium has been linked to lower rates of hospitalization for psychiatric disorders and suicide. On the other hand, exposure to high levels of lithium during pregnancy may have negative effects.
Other studies have suggested connections between ASD and environmental exposures to things like pesticides, air pollution, and phthalates. However, none of these factors have been identified as a direct cause of the disorder.
Researchers point out that it is challenging to prove causal links between environmental exposures and complex conditions like autism. As Dr. Max Wiznitzer said, "There's a lot of speculation about environmental factors, but how many of them are truly causally associated?"
The study's findings have sparked debate among experts, with some arguing that the association between lithium levels in drinking water and ASD is worthy of further investigation. However, others caution against drawing conclusions too quickly. As Dr. Wiznitzer noted, "It's an interesting association, but causation is definitely not proven."
According to a new study published in JAMA Pediatrics, pregnant women who live in areas with higher levels of lithium in their tap water are more likely to give birth to children with ASD. The research found that as lithium levels in water increased, so did the risk of an ASD diagnosis. Specifically, women exposed to the second-highest level of lithium had a 24% to 26% higher risk of giving birth to a child with ASD, while those exposed to the highest level had a 46% higher risk.
However, the study's lead author notes that the research cannot show a direct link between lithium exposure and an autism diagnosis. "Any drinking water contaminants that may affect the developing human brain deserve intense scrutiny," Dr. Beate Ritz said in a news release.
Experts say that further study is needed to understand the potential relationship between lithium levels in drinking water and ASD. The implications of this finding are complex, particularly when it comes to public health policy. On one hand, lithium has been linked to lower rates of hospitalization for psychiatric disorders and suicide. On the other hand, exposure to high levels of lithium during pregnancy may have negative effects.
Other studies have suggested connections between ASD and environmental exposures to things like pesticides, air pollution, and phthalates. However, none of these factors have been identified as a direct cause of the disorder.
Researchers point out that it is challenging to prove causal links between environmental exposures and complex conditions like autism. As Dr. Max Wiznitzer said, "There's a lot of speculation about environmental factors, but how many of them are truly causally associated?"
The study's findings have sparked debate among experts, with some arguing that the association between lithium levels in drinking water and ASD is worthy of further investigation. However, others caution against drawing conclusions too quickly. As Dr. Wiznitzer noted, "It's an interesting association, but causation is definitely not proven."