Europe's Biggest Threat Lurks Within, Not at Trump's Doorstep
The talk among European leaders revolves around a potential Donald Trump invasion or a weakened NATO alliance. While these scenarios are certainly worrisome, experts claim the most significant threat to Europe lies not with the US president, but in his ideological movement that is quietly transforming the continent from within.
Trump's "second American revolution" began innocuously enough when Steve Bannon joined forces with figures like JD Vance. However, as time went on, this partnership has evolved into a sophisticated alliance between Trump and far-right parties across Europe. The US National Security Strategy recently endorsed the growth of "patriotic" European parties, including Reform UK, Alternative fรผr Deutschland (AfD), Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National (RN), Fidesz in Hungary, and Vox in Spain.
These nationalist, populist, and sometimes far-right movements are best understood as part of a broader intellectual project. Unlike their communist counterparts during the Cold War era, however, they do not represent isolated national phenomena but rather an interconnected movement that now boasts foreign backing.
This new right-wing phenomenon is often misrepresented as being stuck in the past, intent on restoring an imagined bygone era. In reality, it has adapted to the 21st-century climate with remarkable precision. Mark Leonard, author of The New Right: Anatomy of a Global Political Revolution, spent over a year studying this movement and found that its strength lies in its ability to tackle contemporary issues.
According to Leonard, the new right targets the failings of liberal democracy, which they argue has proven woefully inept at addressing global crises such as the 2008 financial crash, the eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis, the Covid pandemic, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Each of these events, in their telling, exposed the limits of liberal governance, overwhelmed state capacity, and fueled suspicion about whose interests governments were truly serving.
To address this perceived decay, the new right has proposed a radical rebranding of politics that taps into working-class dissatisfaction with stagnant wages, shrinking social services, and rising costs. By targeting these grievances, they aim to construct a new electoral coalition that promises to restore a shared national identity โ borders become a tool for distinguishing "real" citizens from outsiders.
The movement's mastery of digital platforms has also played a significant role in its success. They have learned to dominate online spaces by advancing permissive interpretations of "free speech," forging alliances with tech moguls like Elon Musk, and saturating the internet with their narratives and slogans. This tactic often relies on "alternative facts" and edgy memes that can be alienating to mainstream audiences.
Perhaps most effective in forcing established parties into an unwinnable position is the new right's ability to portray them as defenders of elites rather than workers or change agents. By adopting this divisive rhetoric, particularly on migration, these challengers often strengthen their grip on power.
A response from centrist forces must acknowledge the force of the new right's critique of liberalism while developing a new strategy that resonates with working-class voters. This approach has shown promise in countries like Denmark and the Netherlands as well as in states like Kentucky and New York. By leveraging the new right's strengths against its weaknesses, there is still hope for the political center to reclaim national sovereignty.
In conclusion, Europe's biggest threat does not come from Trump or an invasion of his ideology. Instead, it is a quietly spreading, hyper-modern movement that has infiltrated the continent's politics and media landscape. For European leaders to address this challenge effectively, they must acknowledge the new right's intellectual project while forging a counter-narrative that speaks to working-class concerns.
The talk among European leaders revolves around a potential Donald Trump invasion or a weakened NATO alliance. While these scenarios are certainly worrisome, experts claim the most significant threat to Europe lies not with the US president, but in his ideological movement that is quietly transforming the continent from within.
Trump's "second American revolution" began innocuously enough when Steve Bannon joined forces with figures like JD Vance. However, as time went on, this partnership has evolved into a sophisticated alliance between Trump and far-right parties across Europe. The US National Security Strategy recently endorsed the growth of "patriotic" European parties, including Reform UK, Alternative fรผr Deutschland (AfD), Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National (RN), Fidesz in Hungary, and Vox in Spain.
These nationalist, populist, and sometimes far-right movements are best understood as part of a broader intellectual project. Unlike their communist counterparts during the Cold War era, however, they do not represent isolated national phenomena but rather an interconnected movement that now boasts foreign backing.
This new right-wing phenomenon is often misrepresented as being stuck in the past, intent on restoring an imagined bygone era. In reality, it has adapted to the 21st-century climate with remarkable precision. Mark Leonard, author of The New Right: Anatomy of a Global Political Revolution, spent over a year studying this movement and found that its strength lies in its ability to tackle contemporary issues.
According to Leonard, the new right targets the failings of liberal democracy, which they argue has proven woefully inept at addressing global crises such as the 2008 financial crash, the eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis, the Covid pandemic, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Each of these events, in their telling, exposed the limits of liberal governance, overwhelmed state capacity, and fueled suspicion about whose interests governments were truly serving.
To address this perceived decay, the new right has proposed a radical rebranding of politics that taps into working-class dissatisfaction with stagnant wages, shrinking social services, and rising costs. By targeting these grievances, they aim to construct a new electoral coalition that promises to restore a shared national identity โ borders become a tool for distinguishing "real" citizens from outsiders.
The movement's mastery of digital platforms has also played a significant role in its success. They have learned to dominate online spaces by advancing permissive interpretations of "free speech," forging alliances with tech moguls like Elon Musk, and saturating the internet with their narratives and slogans. This tactic often relies on "alternative facts" and edgy memes that can be alienating to mainstream audiences.
Perhaps most effective in forcing established parties into an unwinnable position is the new right's ability to portray them as defenders of elites rather than workers or change agents. By adopting this divisive rhetoric, particularly on migration, these challengers often strengthen their grip on power.
A response from centrist forces must acknowledge the force of the new right's critique of liberalism while developing a new strategy that resonates with working-class voters. This approach has shown promise in countries like Denmark and the Netherlands as well as in states like Kentucky and New York. By leveraging the new right's strengths against its weaknesses, there is still hope for the political center to reclaim national sovereignty.
In conclusion, Europe's biggest threat does not come from Trump or an invasion of his ideology. Instead, it is a quietly spreading, hyper-modern movement that has infiltrated the continent's politics and media landscape. For European leaders to address this challenge effectively, they must acknowledge the new right's intellectual project while forging a counter-narrative that speaks to working-class concerns.