UK's Pre-Budget Lobbying is Getting Out of Hand, Chancellor Must Tune It Out
We're witnessing the loudest pre-budget lobbying in years. On Westminster Bridge last week, masked protesters holding champagne and sacks of cash taunted the big four banks' CEOs, demanding a windfall tax on their domestic profits. This time, inflation has pushed bank profits to record heights, coincidentally raising the cost of living for ordinary people.
Banks claim that introducing such a levy would damage competitiveness with foreign banks. However, campaigners argue it's only fair given the banks' significant investment in real economy dwindling while shareholders reap massive dividends.
The cacophony of pre-budget lobbying has become deafening – even smaller demonstrations are barely reported. Lobbyists threaten dire consequences if new taxes are introduced. The public's most popular target is now gambling, with a 50% tax seen as a potential revenue earner, but the industry's influence is immense.
Gambling firms have loudly condemned any proposed tax increase, calling it "economically reckless." Meanwhile, property taxes are seen as chaotic and unjust – yet rebalancing council tax remains a taboo topic. Estate agents warn that taxing mansions worth over £2m could harm the housing market.
The rental market's collapse is another cause for concern, with landlords and letting agents decrying equalising national insurance on earned and unearned income. Reforming business rates to charge big supermarkets more might revive high streets but could also drive up food prices – no clear win in sight.
Taxing pensions or savings has been ruled out as taboo topics by the powerful pension industry and tax-free Isa opponents. The only taxes that have garnered public support are those levied on the rich, social media companies, or those targeting specific sectors like gambling and banks.
Chancellor Reeves must tune out this lobbying chaos and focus on what's right for the country – a fairer system where everyone contributes based on ability to pay. No pro-tax message can beat an anti-tax message; she needs to trust her own judgment despite being vilified and savaged by opponents.
We're witnessing the loudest pre-budget lobbying in years. On Westminster Bridge last week, masked protesters holding champagne and sacks of cash taunted the big four banks' CEOs, demanding a windfall tax on their domestic profits. This time, inflation has pushed bank profits to record heights, coincidentally raising the cost of living for ordinary people.
Banks claim that introducing such a levy would damage competitiveness with foreign banks. However, campaigners argue it's only fair given the banks' significant investment in real economy dwindling while shareholders reap massive dividends.
The cacophony of pre-budget lobbying has become deafening – even smaller demonstrations are barely reported. Lobbyists threaten dire consequences if new taxes are introduced. The public's most popular target is now gambling, with a 50% tax seen as a potential revenue earner, but the industry's influence is immense.
Gambling firms have loudly condemned any proposed tax increase, calling it "economically reckless." Meanwhile, property taxes are seen as chaotic and unjust – yet rebalancing council tax remains a taboo topic. Estate agents warn that taxing mansions worth over £2m could harm the housing market.
The rental market's collapse is another cause for concern, with landlords and letting agents decrying equalising national insurance on earned and unearned income. Reforming business rates to charge big supermarkets more might revive high streets but could also drive up food prices – no clear win in sight.
Taxing pensions or savings has been ruled out as taboo topics by the powerful pension industry and tax-free Isa opponents. The only taxes that have garnered public support are those levied on the rich, social media companies, or those targeting specific sectors like gambling and banks.
Chancellor Reeves must tune out this lobbying chaos and focus on what's right for the country – a fairer system where everyone contributes based on ability to pay. No pro-tax message can beat an anti-tax message; she needs to trust her own judgment despite being vilified and savaged by opponents.