The Guardian view on deprived neighbourhoods: incomes as well as places need a boost | Editorial

Millions of Britons are stuck in the same economic trap, trapped in areas deemed "most deprived" due to factors beyond their control. The latest data highlights the stark reality that nearly all England's most deprived neighbourhoods are located in Labour Party heartlands, with areas like Blackpool and Middlesbrough featuring prominently.

This is a wake-up call for Labour, which trails Reform UK in the polls, as it seeks to address the growing economic divide between urban and post-industrial regions. In fact, analysis shows that investment in the north-east during this parliament will be seven times higher than under Boris Johnson's government if trends continue.

However, the latest data also underscores the difficulties of addressing neighbourhood-level deprivation, a relative measure that is far broader than poverty calculated by income alone. The most significant change to the official figures is due to the decision to calculate incomes after rather than before housing costs, which highlights the devastating impact of high rents in areas like inner London.

While schemes like Pride in Place aim to strengthen civil society and physical infrastructure, they must not displace longer-standing issues such as affordable housing. Removing the limits placed on benefits by the Tories, including the two-child benefit cap, is also essential if neighbourhoods stuck in deprivation for decades are to have a chance.

The government's levelling up strategy has been less than successful so far, and Labour's successor scheme promises tangible improvements that could boost trust in politics and morale. But new priorities must be set aside to address the fundamental issues driving economic inequality in these regions.

Ultimately, this is a call to action for policymakers to acknowledge the complexity of neighbourhood-level deprivation and develop targeted strategies to tackle it. By doing so, they may yet prove that their commitment to a renewed public realm is more than just rhetoric.
 
๐Ÿ˜’ I gotta say, this economic trap thingy in Britain sounds like a real mess ๐Ÿคฏ. Like, if Labour's not addressing the issue, who will? The Tories didn't exactly do it for them, and Reform UK's not gonna be any better, right? ๐Ÿ™„ And now we're hearing that investment in Northern England is gonna be way higher under Labour... yeah, because that's exactly what they need - more money to fix their economic problems ๐Ÿ’ธ. But you know who's really missing the point here? The government. They just wanna focus on levelling up and all that jazz ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ, without actually doing anything about the fundamental issues driving inequality. I mean, come on, policymakers! Get your act together and develop some targeted strategies already! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
The government's levelling up strategy has been a total disaster ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. These new data stats show how bad the economic trap is in areas like Blackpool and Middlesbrough, and it's all so unfair that Labour Party heartlands are stuck with the worst off areas ๐Ÿ˜”. We need to focus on fixing affordable housing first, or these schemes will just be a waste of time ๐Ÿ’ธ. The Tories' benefit cap was already too harsh, and we should remove those limits ASAP ๐Ÿšซ. It's not rocket science - just give people a decent chance to get out of poverty without all the extra hoops they have to jump through ๐Ÿ™„.
 
I'm literally shaking my head thinking about all these people stuck in economic traps because of places they can't even control ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ’”. It's like, where do you even start? I feel for the Labour Party trying to address this issue, but it's not easy. The data is just so stark and revealing... those areas that are considered "deprived" are actually in their heartlands ๐Ÿ˜•.

And then there's the whole housing thing, which just gets worse. Those high rents in inner London are absolutely brutal ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, who can afford to live anywhere else? It's like they're pricing people out of existence. The government needs to sort this out, pronto! And these schemes like Pride in Place, while well-intentioned, need to be part of a bigger plan that addresses the root issues... not just some cosmetic fix ๐Ÿ’ช.

It's so sad when you think about all the lives being affected by something as basic as economic inequality. It's like, can't we do better? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ I mean, Labour's new scheme might be a step in the right direction, but it's time for policymakers to wake up and take action ๐Ÿ’ก.
 
๐Ÿšจ The stats are clear: Labour's stronghold on "most deprived" areas is a ticking time bomb for the party ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ. If they can't deliver meaningful change, Reform UK will be smiling all the way to power ๐Ÿ˜. And let's not forget, this isn't just about politics - it's about people's lives. Families stuck in cycle of poverty because of high rents, benefits caps, and lack of affordable housing ๐Ÿคฏ. Labour needs a clear plan, pronto! ๐Ÿ’ก
 
๐Ÿค” It's kinda crazy how areas in Labour Party heartlands are still struggling with economic issues ๐Ÿ“‰ I mean, you'd think that since they're supposed to be on the side of helping people, they'd get some support. But it's not that simple, right? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ These regions have been stuck in a cycle of deprivation for years, and it's gonna take more than just a scheme or two to fix it. We need real, sustainable solutions like affordable housing and benefits that actually help people. ๐Ÿ’ธ And can we talk about how ridiculous it is that the Tories introduced a two-child benefit cap? Like, what's next? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
Ugh, this data's gotta be even more depressing than I thought ๐Ÿค•. These areas in Labour heartlands? That's just the tip of the iceberg โ€“ there are plenty of factors at play here, from lack of job opportunities to inadequate transport links... it's like the system's rigged against these people.

And yeah, increasing investment in the north-east sounds great on paper, but it's all about perception vs. reality. When's someone gonna address the root cause? It's not just about throwing money at the problem; it's about finding actual solutions. Removing the two-child benefit cap's a good start, I guess, but that's just band-aid stuff.

What really gets me is how this data might be used to further manipulate the narrative. Politicians'll just cherry-pick the bits that support their agenda and ignore everything else. It's like they're more interested in scoring points than actually making things better for people.
 
It's like they're saying the same old problem over and over ๐Ÿคฏ. These areas have been stuck for years and Labour is all like "we'll fix it" but what's taking them so long? ๐Ÿ˜’ They need to step up their game, I mean, seven times more investment in the north-east during this parliament than before... that's some progress, right? ๐Ÿ’ช But at the same time, they're still not doing enough about affordable housing and benefits. It's all good talk but what are they actually gonna do about it? ๐Ÿค”
 
ugh I'm literally fuming over here ๐Ÿคฏ think about all these people stuck in areas with no escape route, living in perpetual poverty due to circumstances beyond their control...it's like the system is rigged against them. and to make matters worse, Labour gets roasted for being slow on the uptake ๐Ÿ™„ but you know what? they need to take responsibility for this mess. it's not just about throwing money at Pride in Place or levelling up strategy (no pun intended ๐Ÿ˜’) we need concrete solutions like affordable housing and benefits that don't leave people struggling.

and let's be real, if Labour can't tackle this, who will? ๐Ÿค” the Tories may have had their chance, but they blew it big time. so yeah, I'm all for Labour's new scheme, but it needs to be more than just words on paper. we need action, and we need it now ๐Ÿ’ช
 
I'm really worried about all these deprived areas in England... ๐Ÿค• I mean, who wouldn't want to live in an area with access to good job opportunities and affordable housing? It's crazy that Labour's heartlands are still struggling like this. I've got a friend from Middlesbrough and she's always complaining about how hard it is to make ends meet, despite working multiple jobs.

And what's really sad is that the government seems to be more focused on 'levelling up' than actually addressing the problems in these areas. It's like they're just throwing money at the problem without a plan. I wish they'd prioritize affordable housing and benefits for people struggling to get by. We need policymakers who are willing to listen to people on the ground and develop real solutions, not just empty promises.

I remember when my parents moved from a more affluent area to a less desirable part of town... it was like a culture shock. They struggled to make ends meet too, and we had to rely on government support just to get by. It's heartbreaking that so many people are still in the same situation today. ๐Ÿค We need change, and we need it now!
 
๐Ÿค” I'm like really worried about these areas in England, you know? ๐ŸŒŽ They're stuck in this economic trap and it's not fair. Like, why should people be affected by where they live just because of the area they're in? It feels like the system is broken and we need to fix it ASAP ๐Ÿ’ช.

I'm all for Labour trying to address this issue, but it's not gonna be easy, you feel? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ We need more than just Pride in Place schemes. Like, have you seen the housing prices in London? It's crazy! ๐Ÿšซ And what about the benefits cap? That's another whole thing.

I think we need to stop focusing on levelling up and start tackling these root issues that are causing all this economic inequality. We can't just talk about it, we gotta do something tangible ๐Ÿ’ฏ. I hope Labour can actually deliver on their promises this time around ๐Ÿคž.
 
I mean, have you guys seen those poverty stats? ๐Ÿคฏ It's crazy how Labour heartlands are also the most deprived areas in England. Like, what's going on here? Is it just a coincidence or is there something more to it?

And don't even get me started on the housing costs thing. I mean, who can actually afford to live in inner London without breaking the bank? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ It's like they're pricing people out of their own homes.

And what really gets my goat is that these schemes like Pride in Place are all well and good, but they don't address the root issue. Like, how many more benefits limits need to be removed before people can actually afford to live in decent areas?

It's so frustrating because I know Labour has a solid plan to tackle this stuff, but it feels like they're getting lost in the shuffle. Meanwhile, we just keep on hearing about "levelling up" and "public realm"... what does any of that even mean? ๐Ÿค”
 
come on, dont just focus on labour, its like, whats with all these areas being stuck in economic trap? like blackpool and middlesbrough, yeah sure, but what about liverpool, manchester, birmingham? theyre all post-industrial regions with tonnes of history, culture, and talent. why arent we seeing more investment there? ๐Ÿค”

and lets talk about affordable housing, please. its like a joke, you gotta pay through the nose for rent in inner london, meanwhile, areas like blackpool are literally dying because they cant afford to stay. what's the point of all these schemes if youre just gonna displace the problem? we need real solutions, not just PR stunts ๐Ÿšซ
 
it's only getting worse ๐Ÿคฏ, like those areas are already stuck in a never-ending cycle of poverty & neglect. the fact that Labour's areas are hit hardest just proves that the system is rigged against them. and don't even get me started on the benefits cap - it's just another way to keep people down ๐Ÿ˜’. what's next? are they gonna cut subsides too? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” I think this data on deprived areas in England is super worrying. It's crazy how many people are stuck in these areas with no clear way out ๐Ÿšซ. The fact that most of them are in Labour heartlands kinda points to the party's failed policies, but it's also a reminder that we need more than just a quick fix ๐Ÿ’ธ.

I mean, what's the point of investing 7x more in the north-east if we're not addressing the root issues? It's all about affordable housing and reducing those crippling rent prices ๐Ÿ . We can't keep expecting people to work hard and still struggle to make ends meet. That's just not fair.

And let's not forget that poverty isn't just about income, it's also about access to services and opportunities ๐Ÿค. We need to acknowledge the complexities of these issues and develop targeted strategies that actually work for the communities most affected ๐Ÿ’ก.
 
๐ŸŒฑ๐Ÿ’ก I think it's crazy how many Brits are stuck in these areas with no escape ๐Ÿšซ. The fact that Labour areas are mostly deprived zones is wild ๐Ÿ”ฅ. We need more than just Pride in Place, we need real changes like affordable housing and benefits ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ’ธ. It's not just about civil society and infrastructure, it's about giving people a chance to break the cycle ๐Ÿ”„. The government's levelling up strategy is failing, but if Labour can deliver on its promises, that'll be a game-changer ๐ŸŽฎ. We need policymakers to get real and develop strategies that target these issues head-on ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
it's crazy how labours heartlands are also where you'll find some of the most deprived areas in england, like blackpool ๐Ÿคฏ. i mean, what's going on? is it really just coincidence or is there something deeper at play here? and don't even get me started on those high rents in inner london... it's no wonder people are struggling to make ends meet.

i'm not saying labours scheme won't be a step in the right direction, but we need to be realistic about what's going on. poverty isn't just about income, it's about affordable housing and access to resources ๐Ÿ . and let's be real, the govt's 'levelling up' strategy has been a total joke so far.

i'd love to see some actual tangible changes happen here, like removing that two-child benefit cap... that's a no-brainer ๐Ÿ’ธ. but i'm not holding my breath until we see some real action from policymakers.
 
I think its wild how areas like Blackpool are considered most deprived areas in England ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ™๏ธ. Its not just about Labour Party heartlands, it's a whole different story when you look at the stats. Rents in London are insane, especially for inner city areas, and that's why incomes before housing costs made such a big difference ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ’ธ.

I think its time for some serious investment in affordable housing and community projects ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿผ๐ŸŒฑ. Not just schemes like Pride in Place, but actual policies to make it easier for people to afford homes and benefit caps lifted would be a game changer ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ‘Œ. And let's not forget the north-east gets way more funding than under Boris Johnson ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ธ.

Its all about understanding the complexity of deprivation and addressing it head-on ๐Ÿ’ก๐Ÿ“Š. We need policymakers who are willing to put in the work to tackle these issues rather than just throwing money at it ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ’ฐ. And that's exactly what Labour is promising, but they need to follow through on their words ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ’ฌ
 
๐Ÿค” imo, brits are getting caught in this vicious cycle where they're stuck in areas with limited job opportunities and high rents ๐Ÿ™๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ฉ and its not just the labour party that needs to step up, but also gov officials to acknowledge that poverty goes beyond just income ๐Ÿ’ธ. its like, what's the point of all these levelling up schemes if we dont adress the root cause? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
ugh i know its really disheartening to see ppl stuck in these economic traps, but lets not give up hope! ๐ŸŒŸ theres actually some silver lining here - apparently labour's investment plans for the north-east are way higher than what went down under boris ๐Ÿค‘ & now they're making progress on levelling up strategy. also, i feel like schemes like pride in place can make a difference if we get affordable housing sorted ๐Ÿ’ธ so let's focus on supporting those initiatives. maybe its time for gov to think outside the box & not just be reactive? ๐Ÿค”
 
Back
Top