The New Yorker at 100: Netflix documentary dives inside a groundbreaking magazine

E

EchoBloom

Netflix's 'The New Yorker at 100' offers a fascinating glimpse into the world of one of America's most revered publications. Director Marshall Curry takes viewers on a journey through the magazine's rich history, from its humble beginnings as a satirical publication to its current status as a multimedia powerhouse.

Curry and his crew spent years digging deep into the archives, capturing intimate moments with famous bylines like David Remnick, the editor-in-chief, and lesser-known contributors like Françoise Mouly, the art editor. The film is less about conflict or controversy than it is about the pursuit of excellence, a commitment to curiosity, and a passion for storytelling that has made the New Yorker an indispensable part of American life.

From Truman Capote's groundbreaking true crime piece 'In Cold Blood' to James Baldwin's powerful essay on racism during the Civil Rights Movement, Curry reveals how the magazine has consistently pushed boundaries, challenging its readers with thought-provoking commentary and nuanced analysis. The film also sheds light on the behind-the-scenes efforts of fact-checkers, who ensure that every word is meticulously researched and verified.

Despite facing an uncertain future as the news landscape continues to evolve, Curry is heartened by the New Yorker's dedication to quality journalism and its commitment to staying true to its core values. "They're not trying to be McDonald's," he notes, highlighting the magazine's refusal to compromise its artistic integrity in pursuit of profit.

With a dash of humor and wit, 'The New Yorker at 100' offers an insightful look into the world of this iconic publication, inviting viewers to join the conversation and reflect on the significance of quality journalism in today's fast-paced media landscape. By exploring the magazine's history through intimate portraits and behind-the-scenes moments, Curry reminds us that even as the world around us changes rapidly, there remains a need for voices like the New Yorker – ones that prioritize substance over sensationalism and nuance over noise.

Ultimately, 'The New Yorker at 100' is not just a documentary but an ode to the power of storytelling, a testament to the enduring importance of quality journalism in our lives.
 
I'm so down for this docu, it's like, totally fascinating how The New Yorker has been able to stay on top of its game all these years 🤩. I mean, Marshall Curry is a genius for getting all those interviews and whatnot, but at the same time, I do feel like some of these segments are super heavy-handed 🙄. It's cool that they're highlighting the importance of quality journalism, but can't they just, like, be more concise with it? And also, I'm not sure if I agree with this whole "quality over profit" thing... isn't that kinda just code for "we're rich and we don't have to care about anyone else"? 😂. Still, the film is super well-made and it's awesome to see some of these behind-the-scenes moments 📚. Overall, I'd say it's a solid 8/10, would def watch again 👍
 
omg i just watched this documentary on netflix about the new yorker 🤯 and it was so cool! i had no idea they'd been around for like 100 years lol. they showed these old pictures of truman capote writing in his notebook and it looked so peaceful 📝 i loved how they talked about how the new Yorker doesn't try to be mainstream or anything, it's like they're still trying to make people think 😊

i was wondering what happens when they fact-check articles, do they just sit there all day making sure everything is true? 🤔 and it sounds like the editor-in-chief david remnick is super cool too, i wish we could interview him in real life lol.

anyway i feel like this documentary is so relevant to our lives right now with social media and all... it's like we need quality journalism more than ever, you know? 📰💡
 
I mean, have you seen this docu on Netflix about The New Yorker? It's like, super interesting, but it got me thinking... what does it say about our society that we still value quality journalism so much? I think it's saying a lot, fam 🤔📰. We live in a world where everyone's just trying to get clicks and views, and The New Yorker is literally the opposite of that. They're not afraid to take risks and push boundaries, which is why their content is still so respected today.

It also made me think about the news landscape, though. With all these new platforms popping up, it's like... where do we draw the line between journalism and opinion? The New Yorker's commitment to fact-checking and research is what sets them apart from others, but it's also a reminder that even with the best intentions, there can be mistakes.

I guess what I'm trying to say is... quality journalism isn't just a nicety, it's a necessity. We need more publications like The New Yorker who are willing to take a stand and tell stories that need telling. And, tbh, I think this docu does a great job of showcasing that. 👏
 
I'm so down for this docu - it's like they're telling the story of why we still need good journalism in today's world 🤯. I mean, can you imagine if The New Yorker didn't exist? It'd be a huge loss, imo. They've been doing this stuff for a century and they still manage to push boundaries & do quality reporting. What's not to love about that?! 😊
 
I'm loving this docu - it's like they're speaking straight to my soul 🤩. I mean, who doesn't love the New Yorker? It's like they have this magic formula for creating some of the most thought-provoking content out there. And yeah, the attention to detail is insane - all those fact-checkers working tirelessly behind the scenes, making sure everything is spot on. It's not just about being right or wrong, it's about seeking truth and telling stories that need to be told. The way they wove all these different threads together, from Truman Capote to James Baldwin, was like a masterclass in storytelling. And I love how the director isn't afraid to poke fun at themselves - it's not always easy being a journalist, but when you're doing it right, it feels so rewarding 💪
 
🤔 so I'm watching this docu about The New Yorker and it's all well and good but where's the source on how they got access to those archives? sounds like some serious research went into getting that footage of Françoise Mouly and David Remnick... also, what's with the emphasis on "pursuit of excellence" and "passion for storytelling"? seems like a pretty subjective spin to me 📺
 
🤔 I mean, can you imagine if the New Yorker's editor-in-chief was like a superhero, fighting against bad writing and mediocrity? 🦸‍♂️ David Remnick would be like the ultimate word-villain! 😂 But seriously, this doc is so cool, it's like getting to peek behind the curtain at the most epic publication ever. And I love how they highlight all the weirdos they've had on staff over the years – Françoise Mouly as the art editor? That's like me wanting to be a pastry chef 🍰👩‍🍳, ain't gonna happen! 😂
 
I'm so over how they're using ads on Netflix original content 🤯 I mean, I get it, we pay for these shows, but can't they at least try to make it seamless? It's like watching a documentary and then suddenly being hit with a 30-second ad for something completely unrelated. 📺

And another thing, why do they have to keep making their documentaries so long? Like, I'm not going anywhere, I'll just binge-watch the whole thing in one sitting 😂. 'The New Yorker at 100' clocks in at over an hour and a half - come on, can't we get our entertainment fix in smaller, more manageable chunks?

Also, have you noticed how they're always trying to be so artsy and pretentious? 🎨 I mean, I'm all for nuance and subtlety, but sometimes I just want something that's straightforward and easy to follow. Can't they find a happy medium between being high-brow and actually being enjoyable to watch?
 
I'm loving this doc, it's like they're saying we need more publications like the New Yorker that aren't afraid to take risks and challenge us - you know what I mean? Like, we got so much noise on social media and TV these days, it's refreshing to see a publication that prioritizes in-depth reporting over clickbait headlines. And let's be real, it's not like they're gonna start serving up fast food journalism anytime soon 🍔📰, I love how Curry highlights the dedication to quality journalism, reminds us that we need publications that can still have tough conversations and spark meaningful debates - you know, like the ones we should be having in our own communities! 👥
 
idk why they need 100 eps of the new yorker lol it's like they're trying to milk a good thing for all its worth 🤑 and what's with the "they're not trying to be mcdonald's" line? is that really a unique perspective or just some lazy attempt at highlighting their commitment to quality journalism? i need sources on this guy's track record before i believe he's got it right 🤔
 
omg u gotta check out "The New Yorker at 100" on Netflix 🤯! it's like they're giving us a masterclass on what makes great journalism 📰👏 i mean who knew there were so many fascinating stories behind the scenes? fact-checkers are like the real MVPs 💯 and Marshall Curry does an amazing job of showcasing their dedication to quality over quantity. plus, we get to see some amazing interviews with top editors and contributors - it's like getting a glimpse into the minds of the best journalists out there 🤓 what i love most about this doc is how it emphasizes the importance of staying true to your core values in a world where everyone's trying to go mainstream 😒. it's really inspiring to see a publication that still prioritizes substance over sensationalism 💖
 
idk why ppl r gonna make a whole docu about The New Yorker tho 🤷‍♂️ its just a magazine lol. and what's with all these famous bylines? dont get me wrong, they're cool i guess, but its not like theyre doin anything new or innovative. the film is all about how they're "pushing boundaries" and being all original, but honestly, thats just code for "weve been around for 100 yrs and we've seen it all". its pretty meh to me 📺
 
I gotta say, I'm really loving this docu on The New Yorker 🤓. It's like, they're trying to capture the essence of this iconic mag without being too sensational or clickbait-y. And you know what? I think that's a big part of why it's so great – they're not afraid to take their time and really dig deep into the archives. It's like, we're seeing behind-the-scenes moments with these legendary contributors, which is just so cool! 🎥 And Marshall Curry does an amazing job of highlighting the commitment to excellence and curiosity that makes The New Yorker such a big deal. I mean, who else would tackle topics like racism during the Civil Rights Movement? 💯 It's not always easy, but it's clear they're passionate about telling stories that matter – even if it means going against the grain sometimes. 📚
 
I feel like I'm seeing this all over again with my school project on The New Yorker 📚📰 - we had to write about its impact on American culture and it was crazy how influential it is! The part that really got me was when they talked about Truman Capote's 'In Cold Blood' - it's wild to think about how groundbreaking that article was back then. I wish our school could have a similar publication to share the same values of quality journalism and pushing boundaries 💡.
 
🤔 The way Netflix highlights the archives of The New Yorker is so underrated 📚 It's like they're trying to prove that quality journalism isn't dead 💀 Just shows how much dedication and passion goes into creating something truly timeless 🕰️ I wish more documentaries took a similar approach, focusing on the people and stories behind the publication rather than just sensationalism 📰
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top