US Pentagon Funds Diverted to Anti-Immigration Measures, Lawmakers Claim.
A bombshell report has revealed that the Trump administration has siphoned off at least $2 billion from the Pentagon's budget for anti-immigration measures. This diversion of funds is set to more than double in the coming fiscal year, according to a report prepared by Democratic lawmakers.
The report, titled "Draining Defense," highlights how President Trump's hard-line stance on immigration has led to an unprecedented level of commitment of Pentagon funds and troops on immigration matters. The lawmakers, who have expressed outrage at this development, claim that it is an insult to the military service members who are being diverted from their duties for these purposes.
According to the report, the Pentagon plans to spend at least $5 billion for operations on the southern border alone in 2026. This has been condemned as wasteful spending by lawmakers, who argue that such a significant commitment of resources is not only unnecessary but also hampers the overall readiness of the nation's armed forces.
The report notes that when the military is tasked with immigration enforcement โ a role that is not consistent with DoD's mission โ these operations often cost several times more than when the same function is performed by civilian authorities. The lawmakers have expressed concern that this diversion of resources could compromise national security and military readiness.
Critics of the Trump administration argue that the use of Pentagon funds for immigration enforcement is a clear abuse of power. They claim that such actions undermine the integrity of the US military and erode trust in its ability to protect the nation.
The White House has responded by saying that spending allocated money on one mission does not mean other missions become depleted. However, lawmakers are demanding answers from Congress about the diversion of Pentagon funds for immigration enforcement and calling for greater transparency and accountability.
As tensions continue to rise over this issue, concerns have been raised about the implications for national security, military readiness, and the erosion of civil liberties in the US.
A bombshell report has revealed that the Trump administration has siphoned off at least $2 billion from the Pentagon's budget for anti-immigration measures. This diversion of funds is set to more than double in the coming fiscal year, according to a report prepared by Democratic lawmakers.
The report, titled "Draining Defense," highlights how President Trump's hard-line stance on immigration has led to an unprecedented level of commitment of Pentagon funds and troops on immigration matters. The lawmakers, who have expressed outrage at this development, claim that it is an insult to the military service members who are being diverted from their duties for these purposes.
According to the report, the Pentagon plans to spend at least $5 billion for operations on the southern border alone in 2026. This has been condemned as wasteful spending by lawmakers, who argue that such a significant commitment of resources is not only unnecessary but also hampers the overall readiness of the nation's armed forces.
The report notes that when the military is tasked with immigration enforcement โ a role that is not consistent with DoD's mission โ these operations often cost several times more than when the same function is performed by civilian authorities. The lawmakers have expressed concern that this diversion of resources could compromise national security and military readiness.
Critics of the Trump administration argue that the use of Pentagon funds for immigration enforcement is a clear abuse of power. They claim that such actions undermine the integrity of the US military and erode trust in its ability to protect the nation.
The White House has responded by saying that spending allocated money on one mission does not mean other missions become depleted. However, lawmakers are demanding answers from Congress about the diversion of Pentagon funds for immigration enforcement and calling for greater transparency and accountability.
As tensions continue to rise over this issue, concerns have been raised about the implications for national security, military readiness, and the erosion of civil liberties in the US.