US Government Threatens to Cut Off Food Aid for Millions Over Data Demand
The Trump administration has announced plans to withhold food aid from millions of low-income Americans unless they provide detailed information about recipients, sparking a fierce backlash from Democratic-led states.
According to Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, the move is aimed at rooting out fraud in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which provides groceries for nearly half of the US population. However, Democrats have objected to the requirement, citing concerns that it would compromise the privacy and immigration status of recipients.
The decision has been met with outrage from advocates who argue that withholding aid will disproportionately harm vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, and those struggling to make ends meet. "This is a cruel and unnecessary attack on people who are already struggling to get by," said one critic.
SNAP benefits average around $190 per month, or just over $6 per day, making this decision particularly devastating for families living on the edge of poverty. The program has been in the spotlight this year as part of a broader effort to expand work requirements and tighten eligibility rules.
In recent months, the administration has also faced criticism for planning to cut off food aid during the federal government shutdown, only reversing its decision after courts intervened.
Most Republican-controlled states have already provided the requested data, but Democratic-led states have resisted, arguing that they cannot be forced to hand over sensitive information about their constituents. This dispute has led to a number of lawsuits, with some courts blocking the administration's requirements and others allowing them to proceed.
The consequences of this decision are far-reaching, with millions of Americans potentially losing access to life-sustaining groceries if they fail to comply. As one Democratic official warned, "This is a classic example of the Trump administration's disdain for low-income families and its willingness to punish those who need help the most."
The Trump administration has announced plans to withhold food aid from millions of low-income Americans unless they provide detailed information about recipients, sparking a fierce backlash from Democratic-led states.
According to Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, the move is aimed at rooting out fraud in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which provides groceries for nearly half of the US population. However, Democrats have objected to the requirement, citing concerns that it would compromise the privacy and immigration status of recipients.
The decision has been met with outrage from advocates who argue that withholding aid will disproportionately harm vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, and those struggling to make ends meet. "This is a cruel and unnecessary attack on people who are already struggling to get by," said one critic.
SNAP benefits average around $190 per month, or just over $6 per day, making this decision particularly devastating for families living on the edge of poverty. The program has been in the spotlight this year as part of a broader effort to expand work requirements and tighten eligibility rules.
In recent months, the administration has also faced criticism for planning to cut off food aid during the federal government shutdown, only reversing its decision after courts intervened.
Most Republican-controlled states have already provided the requested data, but Democratic-led states have resisted, arguing that they cannot be forced to hand over sensitive information about their constituents. This dispute has led to a number of lawsuits, with some courts blocking the administration's requirements and others allowing them to proceed.
The consequences of this decision are far-reaching, with millions of Americans potentially losing access to life-sustaining groceries if they fail to comply. As one Democratic official warned, "This is a classic example of the Trump administration's disdain for low-income families and its willingness to punish those who need help the most."