Federal Court Seeks to Block $300 Million White House Ballroom Project Amid Preservation Group's Lawsuit
A preservation group has taken Donald Trump to federal court, accusing him of violating multiple laws by demolishing part of the iconic White House without required reviews or congressional approval. The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed a lawsuit on Friday seeking a temporary restraining order to halt construction activities until proper oversight procedures are completed.
According to the complaint, no president is allowed to tear down portions of the White House without review and construct buildings on public property without public input. The organization argues that Trump rushed the demolition of the historic East Wing in October over objections from preservationists who urged a pause and submission of plans to federal review panels.
The lawsuit names Trump and several administration officials as defendants, alleging violations of the National Capital Planning Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Constitution's Property Clause. The preservation group also points out that significant public opposition to the $300 million project exists, with multiple polls showing a majority opposing the demolition and construction of a ballroom.
The funding for the project comes from wealthy individuals and corporations with federal government contracts, including Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Lockheed Martin, and Palantir Technologies. The administration has attempted to draw a distinction between construction on White House grounds, which requires review, and demolition and site preparation, which they claim does not require oversight.
However, the preservation group argues that this distinction is meaningless, citing social media posts of massive construction machinery and teams working regularly on site. Trump previously stated he is not bound by typical building restrictions, saying he can do anything as president.
The National Trust's lawsuit marks the second challenge to the ballroom project following an emergency motion in October that was dismissed by a Virginia couple. If successful, it could potentially halt all construction activities until proper procedures are completed.
A preservation group has taken Donald Trump to federal court, accusing him of violating multiple laws by demolishing part of the iconic White House without required reviews or congressional approval. The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed a lawsuit on Friday seeking a temporary restraining order to halt construction activities until proper oversight procedures are completed.
According to the complaint, no president is allowed to tear down portions of the White House without review and construct buildings on public property without public input. The organization argues that Trump rushed the demolition of the historic East Wing in October over objections from preservationists who urged a pause and submission of plans to federal review panels.
The lawsuit names Trump and several administration officials as defendants, alleging violations of the National Capital Planning Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Constitution's Property Clause. The preservation group also points out that significant public opposition to the $300 million project exists, with multiple polls showing a majority opposing the demolition and construction of a ballroom.
The funding for the project comes from wealthy individuals and corporations with federal government contracts, including Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Lockheed Martin, and Palantir Technologies. The administration has attempted to draw a distinction between construction on White House grounds, which requires review, and demolition and site preparation, which they claim does not require oversight.
However, the preservation group argues that this distinction is meaningless, citing social media posts of massive construction machinery and teams working regularly on site. Trump previously stated he is not bound by typical building restrictions, saying he can do anything as president.
The National Trust's lawsuit marks the second challenge to the ballroom project following an emergency motion in October that was dismissed by a Virginia couple. If successful, it could potentially halt all construction activities until proper procedures are completed.