In a surprising move, US President Donald Trump has proposed to relax fuel economy standards for new cars in the country. The plan, announced in the Oval Office, aims to lower the target fleet-wide average fuel efficiency to 34.5 miles per gallon by model year 2031 from the current 50.4 miles per gallon set by the Biden administration.
The idea behind this rollback is to make new cars more affordable for consumers. However, experts say that price drops are unlikely to materialize anytime soon. Automakers have a long lead time when planning and developing new vehicles, which means it could take several years before cheaper cars hit the market.
Moreover, even if cheaper cars do become available, Americans would likely end up spending more on gas in the meantime due to less fuel-efficient vehicles on the road. The current average price of a new car is over $49,000, and automakers estimate that the change could save buyers around $1,000 per car.
Environmental advocates are also expressing concerns about this move, which they say would weaken federal efforts to address climate change. The previous administration had taken a more aggressive approach to vehicle emissions, with targets for electric vehicles and penalties for manufacturers that failed to meet standards.
However, the new proposal has received backing from some in the auto industry, who claim that the current rules are too burdensome given the limited market for electric vehicles. They argue that easing these requirements would help at the margins but is unlikely to fundamentally change the direction of automakers' commitments.
Overall, the Trump administration's proposal highlights the complexities and challenges involved in regulating the automotive industry. While some may see it as a measure to make cars more affordable, others believe it would ultimately harm consumers and exacerbate climate change issues.
The idea behind this rollback is to make new cars more affordable for consumers. However, experts say that price drops are unlikely to materialize anytime soon. Automakers have a long lead time when planning and developing new vehicles, which means it could take several years before cheaper cars hit the market.
Moreover, even if cheaper cars do become available, Americans would likely end up spending more on gas in the meantime due to less fuel-efficient vehicles on the road. The current average price of a new car is over $49,000, and automakers estimate that the change could save buyers around $1,000 per car.
Environmental advocates are also expressing concerns about this move, which they say would weaken federal efforts to address climate change. The previous administration had taken a more aggressive approach to vehicle emissions, with targets for electric vehicles and penalties for manufacturers that failed to meet standards.
However, the new proposal has received backing from some in the auto industry, who claim that the current rules are too burdensome given the limited market for electric vehicles. They argue that easing these requirements would help at the margins but is unlikely to fundamentally change the direction of automakers' commitments.
Overall, the Trump administration's proposal highlights the complexities and challenges involved in regulating the automotive industry. While some may see it as a measure to make cars more affordable, others believe it would ultimately harm consumers and exacerbate climate change issues.
, but also super confused. I mean, I get where they're coming from with making cars more affordable, but I don't know if it's the best idea. Like, sure, cheaper cars sound great on paper, but what about all the people who are gonna be stuck driving gas-guzzlers for years? 
It's not like automakers can just flip a switch and make new, efficient cars appear out of thin air. And don't even get me started on the environmental impact... I'm all for making cars more affordable, but we need to find a way to do it without sacrificing our planet 
.
. Like, what happened to the electric vehicle targets and penalties? That was a solid move, if you ask me 
️. Anyway, I'm all for a good debate about it, but can we please get some clearer heads involved in this conversation 
?
But seriously, this plan is like, what's the point? We're already seeing electric vehicles popping up left and right, so it doesn't make sense to relax these standards now.
. I mean, sure, maybe some rich folks might be able to splurge on a new ride every few years, but what about the rest of us who can barely afford our current cars? It just doesn't add up.
. This plan just feels like a bunch of hooey to me...
. Like, what's the point of making new cars cheaper if we're just gonna waste even more gas in the process? It's all about finding a balance, you know? And I don't think Trump's plan does that. The fact that it'll save buyers like $1,000 per car is cool and all, but what about the long-term effects on our planet? 
We need to be thinking about the future here, not just some short-term gains. I'm also kinda with the experts on this one - automakers have plenty of time to adjust their production lines, no need for a hasty change. Let's wait and see what happens, but I'm keeping an eye on this one 
. They're all about making cars cheaper but what about the future? We cant just ignore the climate crisis 
.
Its like they wanna make a quick buck instead of thinking about the bigger picture 
.
. With how long it takes for car manufacturers to develop new vehicles, we're still looking at 2-3 years before you see any real price drops 
.
. The previous admin was on the right track with those stricter emissions standards 
. This new proposal just feels like a cop-out 
, and I realized how weird it is that we spend so much time worrying about our cars being fuel-efficient when we could be worried about our pets' digestive health 
. Anyway, back to this Trump thing... I mean, who thought it was a good idea to make new cars less fuel-efficient? 
. But, on the other hand, I've been meaning to ask my neighbor about their lawn care routine - have you guys tried that new type of fertilizer? 
, but shouldn't we be encouraging them more? 
️.
. If the government can't agree on a set of rules that everyone's happy with, then what's the point? It feels like we're just going through the motions at this stage – and it's not even clear if this proposal is actually going to make cars cheaper for people or not 
. Maybe there's a middle ground that everyone can agree on – but as it stands, I'm not feeling very optimistic 
.
.
.
And what about those electric vehicles that are supposed to save us in the long run?