Federal jury orders Uber to pay $8.5 million to passenger who accused driver of rape.
A US federal jury has ruled in favor of Jaylynn Dean, a woman who claimed she was raped by an Uber driver in 2023 after ordering a ride home from her boyfriend's apartment. The verdict holds the ride-hailing company liable for the driver's actions, with a total payout of $8.5 million.
Dean's lawyers argued that she had been incorrectly flagged as high-risk before her ride arrived, and that Uber's safety measures were inadequate. They claimed that the company resisted introducing in-car cameras to improve safety, citing concerns over slowing down growth.
However, the jury found Uber not negligent in its safety practices, stating that its app's safety systems were not faulty. An Uber spokesperson said that the verdict "affirms that Uber acted responsibly and invested meaningfully in rider safety." The spokesperson also announced that Uber plans to appeal the decision.
This case is one of 3,000 similar lawsuits consolidated in federal court, with the outcome of this trial serving as a bellwether for the potential settlements. If upheld by the appeals court, the verdict could set a precedent for all other pending lawsuits against the company.
The ruling marks another blow to Uber's efforts to distance itself from its drivers' actions. In 2023, a California jury found that the company was not liable for a sexual assault committed by one of its drivers in 2016. The case is seen as significant, with Dean's lawyer stating that women were "made to believe it was a safe place" through Uber's marketing and safety claims.
The decision comes as Uber continues to face scrutiny over its handling of sexual assault allegations and its role in protecting passengers from harm.
A US federal jury has ruled in favor of Jaylynn Dean, a woman who claimed she was raped by an Uber driver in 2023 after ordering a ride home from her boyfriend's apartment. The verdict holds the ride-hailing company liable for the driver's actions, with a total payout of $8.5 million.
Dean's lawyers argued that she had been incorrectly flagged as high-risk before her ride arrived, and that Uber's safety measures were inadequate. They claimed that the company resisted introducing in-car cameras to improve safety, citing concerns over slowing down growth.
However, the jury found Uber not negligent in its safety practices, stating that its app's safety systems were not faulty. An Uber spokesperson said that the verdict "affirms that Uber acted responsibly and invested meaningfully in rider safety." The spokesperson also announced that Uber plans to appeal the decision.
This case is one of 3,000 similar lawsuits consolidated in federal court, with the outcome of this trial serving as a bellwether for the potential settlements. If upheld by the appeals court, the verdict could set a precedent for all other pending lawsuits against the company.
The ruling marks another blow to Uber's efforts to distance itself from its drivers' actions. In 2023, a California jury found that the company was not liable for a sexual assault committed by one of its drivers in 2016. The case is seen as significant, with Dean's lawyer stating that women were "made to believe it was a safe place" through Uber's marketing and safety claims.
The decision comes as Uber continues to face scrutiny over its handling of sexual assault allegations and its role in protecting passengers from harm.