US may require visa-free travellers to submit social media, family data

US Proposes Radical New Screening Measure for Visa-Exempt Travelers, Demanding Personal Data from Social Media to Homeland Security.

A proposed rule by the Department of Homeland Security would require foreign nationals traveling under the Visa Waiver Program to provide extensive personal data, including social media information and metadata from phone accounts over the past five years. This measure is part of a broader effort to enhance national security and ensure that only trustworthy individuals enter the United States.

The new requirements are set to apply to travelers from more than 30 countries who don't need visas for visits of up to three months. They would be required to submit information on their social media accounts, including posts, comments, and likes, as well as details about email addresses used over the past decade. Furthermore, they must provide metadata related to photos submitted electronically, along with family member data, including birthplaces and phone numbers.

These enhanced screening measures come amid a renewed focus on national security by the current administration. President Donald Trump has stated that the aim is to "make sure we're not letting the wrong people come into our country." Critics have expressed concerns about these new requirements, particularly in regards to free speech rights and the potential for misuse of personal data.

The proposed rule is currently open for public comment until January 9th. When finalized, it would represent a significant shift in how U.S. authorities screen visa-exempt travelers. Those traveling under the program must now fill out an application that asks for limited questions about their family members, whereas the new requirements demand much more personal data.

As part of a larger effort to vet those entering the country, Customs and Border Protection is revisiting screening procedures. Following the terrorist attack on the National Guard in Washington D.C., they are looking at ways to enhance checks on travelers and immigrants alike.

This measure has sparked debates about national security and individual rights. Some experts argue that these measures could infringe upon free speech and civil liberties, whereas others see them as a necessary step towards safeguarding public safety.
 
Ugh, this is gonna be super invasive 🀯. Can't believe they're asking for social media info and phone records from 5 yrs ago... like, what's next? DNA testing or something? πŸ˜’ And it's not just about free speech, it's also a huge security risk if these things get hacked 🚫. I mean, I'm all for keeping our country safe, but do we really need to sacrifice our personal freedom in the process? πŸ€”
 
😊 I just can't help but think about how this new screening measure might impact our digital footprints, you know? As someone who's been around the block a few times, I'm all for keeping our country safe, but do we really need to dig up everyone's social media history like it's some kinda digital trash can? 🀯 The thought of giving up that kind of info just feels like a big ol' leap towards surveillance state territory. And what about all those folks who don't exactly have the most stellar online presence – are they gonna get a free pass or be singled out too? πŸ€”
 
I'm so worried about this new screening measure πŸ€•... it feels like we're living in some dystopian movie where our every move is being watched and tracked. I remember when I was traveling to Europe back in the day, all I needed was my passport and a smile 😊. Now, they want social media info and metadata from phone accounts? It's just too much, you know? 🀯

I'm not saying we shouldn't be safe, but do we really need to sacrifice our freedom for it? I recall the good old days when we could just enjoy our trip without all these extra hoops to jump through. And what about free speech, right? Are they gonna monitor my tweets and comments too? πŸ€” It's just not fair.

I guess this is what happens when security becomes a top priority 🚨... but at what cost? I'm just worried that we're losing something precious in the process πŸ’”.
 
I'm not sure if this is the way to go, you know? I mean, we're already living in a world where our personal data is being used against us, what's next? 🀯 They want social media info and metadata from phone accounts? That's like, totally invading our privacy, right? And for what? So they can "safeguard public safety"? I'm not convinced. This just feels like another excuse to control people's lives. What about free speech, though? Don't we have the right to express ourselves online without being scrutinized? πŸ€” It's a slippery slope, you know?

I remember when I traveled to Europe last year, I was required to fill out this super lengthy application with just basic questions about my family members. Now they want all this extra info? That's some crazy stuff. And what about the potential for misuse of personal data? I mean, we've seen it happen before, and it's not pretty. 🚨 This whole thing is just too much for me.

I'm still on the fence about this one, though. Maybe they have a good reason behind it, and it'll all make sense in the end. But right now, I'm just feeling a bit uneasy about it all. What do you guys think? Should we be required to give up so much of our personal data for "national security"? 🀝
 
I think this new rule is a bit overkill πŸ€”... I mean, what's the real threat to our national security that we can't find another way to address? We're already sharing so much info online, it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff, you know? And who's going to decide what's "trustworthy" and what's not? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It sounds like a recipe for a whole lot of data mining, which just begs the question: are we really making our country safer or just getting creepier? 😬 The government should focus on more tangible threats, like cyber attacks or organized crime... this feels like overkill to me. 🚫
 
I'm like totally concerned about this new screening thingy 🀯... I mean, what's next? Are they gonna ask for our browser history too? πŸ˜‚ It seems so invasive, you know? Like, we're already sharing way too much info online and now they wanna add more? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ And what's with the social media stuff? That's like, super personal 🀫. I get that national security is important and all, but can't we find other ways to vet people without compromising our freedoms? πŸ€” It just seems like another way for them to keep tabs on us, you know? πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ
 
Ugh, come on! πŸ™„ A new rule requiring social media info from international travelers? That's just not needed, fam. I mean, what's next? Asking for our DNA? πŸ’‰ It's just another example of the government overstepping its bounds and threatening our personal freedoms. And don't even get me started on the metadata – like, who needs all that info from our phone accounts? πŸ“± That's just a recipe for a major breach. And what about free speech concerns? You're basically asking people to log into their social media accounts and give up some of their private moments. Not cool, DHS. Not cool. πŸ˜’
 
omg like what's next? they're gonna ask us to share our memes too 🀣 seriously though, i'm all for safety and security but this is getting out of hand. social media info and metadata from 5 yrs ago? it's just too much πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ and what about free speech rights? isn't that kinda the point of having a platform like facebook or twitter in the first place? πŸ€” i think the gov's got some serious 'splainin' to do on this one...
 
Back
Top